Sven klumpe (Talk | contribs) |
Sven klumpe (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
text-align: left; | text-align: left; | ||
margin-bottom: 10px; | margin-bottom: 10px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | #HQ_page h2{ | ||
+ | text-align: left; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 22: | Line 26: | ||
} | } | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
#myContent tr p{ | #myContent tr p{ | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
margin-top: 75px; | margin-top: 75px; | ||
margin-bottom: 75px; | margin-bottom: 75px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | #HQ_page .equationDiv img { | ||
+ | height: 100px; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 65: | Line 69: | ||
<!-- Head End --> | <!-- Head End --> | ||
<!-- Content Begin --> | <!-- Content Begin --> | ||
− | <img id="TopPicture" width=" | + | <img id="TopPicture" width="800" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/62/T--Munich--FrontPagePictures_Modeling.jpg"> |
<table width="960" border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=10> | <table width="960" border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=10> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 76: | Line 80: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr><td colspan=6 align=left valign=center> | <tr><td colspan=6 align=left valign=center> | ||
− | <font size=7 color=#51a7f9><b style="color: #51a7f9"> | + | <font size=7 color=#51a7f9><b style="color: #51a7f9">Modelling</b></font> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr class="lastRow"> | <tr class="lastRow"> | ||
− | <td colspan = 6 align="left"> | + | <td colspan=6 align="left"> |
<p class="introduction"> | <p class="introduction"> | ||
− | + | Modelling in Biosciences is a powerful tool that allows one to get a deeper understanding | |
− | + | of one's system. We mainly used Modelling to help with the design of our device. | |
− | + | By this, we could avoid spending time on dead-end-designs that otherwise might have | |
− | mainly | + | cost us a significant amount of time. Rather simple models can already give |
− | to | + | fair amount of information about one's system. That is why we decided at an early stage to incorporate |
− | + | Modelling in our device design. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | that have | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | our | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
− | + | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | |
− | + | <h2>Detection Limit</h2> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | <tr | + | |
− | < | + | |
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | One major concern when dealing with the problem of diagnostics on patients is obtaining the sample with which | |
− | + | detection can actually be performed. Since we wanted our method to be non-invasive, one concern that we needed to | |
− | + | deal with is the concentration of pathogens and thus detectable RNA in the patients mucus. First approximations from | |
− | + | different papers already showed that virological samples show concentrations no higher than low pM and can even go as low | |
− | + | as fM. Thus, we characterised the theoretical detection limit of the Cas13a RNAse activity. In order to do this, we first | |
− | + | fitted parameters using experimental data to the model shown below and used these in target RNA concentration dependent | |
− | + | simulations. The results are shown in Figure 1. It shows that the detection limit in the time range of an hour is | |
+ | approximately one- to two-digit nM region. Due to this result, our initial design of applying the lysed and purified RNA sample | ||
+ | directly on the detection paper strip had to be discarded. Instead, we had to explore amplification methods we could | ||
+ | perform upstream in the detection process. | ||
+ | As a side note, the detection limit could most probably have been pushed a bit to lower concentrations by using higher | ||
+ | concentrations in Cas13a and crRNA, but by doing this production cost per paperstrip would have increased a lot. Also, | ||
+ | it is known from literature that Cas proteins at high concentrations show activity independent of their activation mechanism | ||
+ | which is why the concentration of Cas13a in the detection system could not be increased by higher orders of magnitude. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="captionPicture"> | ||
+ | <img alt="LightbringerReal" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c5/T--Munich--ModellingPagePicture_Theoretical_Detection_Limit.png" width="600"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Figure 1: Theoretical Detection Limit determined for the Cas13a system using 20 nM concentrations of Cas13a and crRNA. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Since our detector has shown to be sensitive enough to detect one-digit nM concentrations of RNase alert, the needed concentration of | ||
+ | protein and crRNA could be downscaled, as only few nM of cleaved RNase alert were needed to get a read-out. The concentrations | ||
+ | were then pushed from the initial model which included 20 nM Cas13a and 20 nM crRNA to 1 nM Cas13a and 10 nM crRNA. | ||
+ | The plot below shows that the Theoretical Detection Limit still stays equal, bearing in mind that detection occurs once ~6 nM RNase alert | ||
+ | have been cleaved. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="captionPicture"> | ||
+ | <img alt="LightbringerReal" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/46/T--Munich--ModellingPagePicture_Theoretical_Detection_Limit_lowCas.png" width="600"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Figure 2: Theoretical Detection Limit determined for the Cas13a system using concentrations of 1 nM Cas13a and 10 nM crRNA. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
− | < | + | <h2>Lysis on Chip</h2> |
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | We modelled the lysis process on chip to get an idea of how long lysis would need to take place | |
− | + | in order to release enough RNA for downstream amplification. For this, we constructed a very simplistic | |
− | + | model for bacterial cell lysis. In this, we estimated the rate constants for cell lysis by common colony PCR | |
− | + | protocols which use a 10 minute lysis step at 95 °C for thermolysis. Thus, we considered a half-time of Bacteria | |
− | + | of 2 minutes at 95 °C. This would result in a lysis efficiency of 96.875%. Starting from this estimation, | |
− | + | we considered the rate constant of lysis and thus the half-time using Arrhenius equation: | |
</p> | </p> | ||
− | </ | + | <p> |
− | </ | + | <div class="equationDiv"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b0/T--Munich--Model_Equation_1.png"><span>(1)</span></div> |
− | + | <div class="equationDiv"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/30/T--Munich--Model_Equation_2.png"><span>(2)</span></div> | |
− | < | + | </p> |
− | < | + | <p> |
+ | with rate constants k<sub>1</sub> and k<sub>2</sub> at temperature T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> | ||
+ | and Boltzmann constant R. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | where R is the gas constant and k<sub>1</sub> and k<sub>2</sub> are the rate constant at temperature T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> | ||
+ | The activation energy difference E_A was fitted to a barrier that follows the common rule of thumb that lysis should increase twice in | ||
+ | efficiency for every temperature increase of 10 °C. The model for lysis is shown derived in the following: | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The full model can then be described by the coupled ordinary differential equations:<br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <div class="equationDiv"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/7d/T--Munich--Model_Equation_3.png"><span>(3)</span></div> | ||
+ | <div class="equationDiv"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/35/T--Munich--Model_Equation_4.png"><span>(4)</span></div> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | with k<sub>lysis</sub> being the rate constant of bacterial lysis, k<sub>RNase</sub> the rate constant | ||
+ | of RNA degradation, count of target RNA [targetRNA] and count of bacteria Baks(t). | ||
+ | The solution to equation 3 is of course simply: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | <div class="equationDiv"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/81/T--Munich--Model_Equation_5.png"><span>(5)</span></div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Plugging equation 5 into equation 4 gives | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <div class="equationDiv"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6d/T--Munich--Model_Equation_6.png"><span>(6)</span></div> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | where ratio determines the copy number of a target RNA in a single cell. This differential equation has the form and thus the analytical solution: | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Equation 7 + 8 | ||
+ | <div class="equationDiv"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b7/T--Munich--Model_Equation_7.png"><span>(7)</span></div> | ||
+ | <div class="equationDiv"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e5/T--Munich--Model_Equation_8.png"><span>(8)</span></div> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | with initial condition of | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <div class="equationDiv"><img style="height: 40px;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/4e/T--Munich--Model_Equation_10.png"><span>(10)</span></div> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | we get the final solution to the lysis equation: | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <div class="equationDiv"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5d/T--Munich--Model_Equation_11.png"><span>(11)</span></div> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The full model at different temperatures looks as follows: | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="captionPicture"> | ||
+ | <img width=800 align=center valign=center src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f1/T--Munich--ModellingPagePicture_Lysis_Temperature.png" alt="Lysis_Temperature"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Figure 3: Effect of lysis temperature on the lysis efficiency of bacterial cells | ||
+ | and determination of the released concentration of target RNA from lysis assuming a ratio of 30 | ||
+ | RNA molecules per cell. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
− | <tr | + | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> |
− | < | + | <h2>Signal Amplification</h2> |
− | + | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | For the simulation of an amplification system, we developd a model for a circuit amplifying an RNA. Therefore, | |
− | + | we couple a Reverse Trancription to an isothermal PCR-like amplification called Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) | |
− | + | and do In-Vitro Transcription from the build template. A scheme for the model is shown in Figure 4. | |
− | + | For simplicity, we made assumptions to this model:<br> | |
− | + | First, the RPA reaction is thought to be in the linear region, independent of Primer concentration since we | |
− | + | work in an environment of very high primer and dNTP concentrations (up to 1000 nM) and only want to reach RNA concentration within the | |
− | of | + | range of the detection limit of our Cas13a protein, which is in the nM region. Therefore, since we are amplifying the RNA by |
− | + | Transcription from the cDNA, this assumption is reasonable. The same argument goes for the In-Vitro Transcription; since we | |
− | + | are in an environment of excessive rNTP concentrations, thus first order approximation is valid. <br> | |
− | < | + | Rate constants were approximated by experiments or taken from literature. The only rate constant that was not available was |
+ | the rate of Reverse Transcription. We, thus, took producer's information about commercial RT kits and estimated from these very | ||
+ | conservatively (two orders of magnitude less in reaction speed) to not be biased in the simulation by overfitting parameters. <br> | ||
+ | The rate constants are the following: | ||
+ | COUNT ALL 4 RATE CONSTANTS | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | <p> | |
− | + | The coupled ODEs for the signal amplification circuit can be described simply by: | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | Equations 12 + 13 | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <div class="captionPicture"> | |
− | + | <img width=600 align=center valign=center src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/dc/T--Munich--ModellingPagePicture_RT-RPA-TX_scheme.svg" alt="RT-RPA-TX_scheme"> | |
− | + | <p> | |
+ | Figure 4: Scheme for the RT-RPA-Tx Amplification system. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="captionPicture"> | ||
+ | <img width=800 align=center valign=center src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8c/T--Munich--ModellingPagePicture_RT-RPA-TX.png" alt="RT-RPA-TX"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Figure 5: Target RNA concentration dependent on initial concentrations to determine the cycle time in RT-RPA-Tx needed for reaching | ||
+ | the Cas13a detection limit of 10 nM (red line). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The overall dynamics of the RT-RPA-Tx system are shown below for several starting concentrations of RNA. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | </tr> | + | </tr> |
− | + | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | |
− | + | <h2>Theoretical Detection Limit using the Amplification Circuit and Cas13a Detection</h2> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | <tr | + | |
− | < | + | |
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | Since the reasoning behind using an amplification method was to bring down the detection limit, a new theoretical | |
− | + | detection limit of the device may be determined combining model of lysis and isothermal amplification. For this, | |
− | + | a reasonable cycle time for point-of-care application of one hour was chosen. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="captionPicture"> | ||
+ | <img width=800 align=center valign=center src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/40/T--Munich--ModellingPagePicture_Cycle_Times2.png" alt="RT-RPA-TX"> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | Determining Cycle times to reach 10 nM Detection Limit using Amplification Circuit. Red dashed line marks the end of the thermolysis | |
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | When comparing this to cycle times needed for reaching the detection limit at 95 °C, one sees that lysis temperatures is not very important | |
+ | to the amplification and only results in a slight shift to longer time scales. This is reasonable, since RPA, and PCR in general, | ||
+ | are enormously sensitive methods, and thus only need few templates to show a signal. Also, when comparing the concentrations | ||
+ | in the temperature screen above, one can observe that the concentrations of RNA within the sample only change insignificantly, all showing concentrations that range | ||
+ | within three-digit attomolar region or higher. Also, this model works with the statement in the literature that as little as 10 templates are enough to trigger amplification through RPA. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
− | + | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | |
− | <tr | + | <h2>Signal Amplification Measurement in RPATx</h2> |
− | < | + | |
− | + | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | The | + | When we performed time-dependent measurements of crRNA in a RPATx Ansatz, we measured saturation of T7 RNA Polymerase already at 0.2 nM template DNA. The reaction |
+ | kinetics and thus the formation of RNA showed pseudo-first order dynamics with a rate constant of 97 ng/min transcribed RNA. Compared to the literature (https://www.biosciencetechnology.com/article/2003/09/maximizing-yield-full-length-rna-vitro-transcription-reaction) this is not even the bottleneck since <i>In-Vitro Transcription</i> reactions can yield up to 400 μg in 4 hours. This led us to try out a concentration series of different template concentration and try whether we could detect the extracted RNA with Cas13a. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | |||
− | + | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | |
− | + | <h3>References</h3> | |
− | + | <p> | |
− | + | <ol style="text-align: left"> | |
− | + | <li id="ref_1"></li> | |
− | + | <li id="ref_2"></li> | |
− | + | <li id="ref_3"></li> | |
− | + | <li id="ref_4"></li> | |
− | + | <li id="ref_5"></li> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | </ol> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | </ | + | |
− | < | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | </tr> | + | </tr> |
<tr><td class="no-padding" colspan=6 align=right valign=center height=10> | <tr><td class="no-padding" colspan=6 align=right valign=center height=10> |
Revision as of 04:28, 1 November 2017