Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
<h3>ssDNA Readout</h3> | <h3>ssDNA Readout</h3> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | For this readout, we wanted to link the cleavage of an RNA strand (due to Cas13a activation) to an amplification scheme based on ssDNA. A dimer is formed between a ssDNA sequence and an inhibitor ssRNA sequence. This RNA is composed of three regions binding to the ssDNA separated by polyU loops (<b>Figure 2</b>), so that upon cleavage of the polyU loops by Cas13a, the melting temperature of the dimer is lowered and the cleaved ssRNA falls off. The ssDNA is freed and can be used into an amplification scheme: we envisioned that it would either complete a linear transcription template (known as genelet) that is single-stranded in its promoter region, and activate its transcription <b>(reference:Timing molecular motion and production with a synthetic transcriptional clock | + | For this readout, we wanted to link the cleavage of an RNA strand (due to Cas13a activation) to an amplification scheme based on ssDNA. A dimer is formed between a ssDNA sequence and an inhibitor ssRNA sequence. This RNA is composed of three regions binding to the ssDNA separated by polyU loops (<b>Figure 2</b>)<b>insert fig from project design</b>, so that upon cleavage of the polyU loops by Cas13a, the melting temperature of the dimer is lowered and the cleaved ssRNA falls off. The ssDNA is freed and can be used into an amplification scheme: we envisioned that it would either complete a linear transcription template (known as genelet) that is single-stranded in its promoter region, and activate its transcription <b>(reference:Timing molecular motion and production with a synthetic transcriptional clock |
Elisa Francoa, Eike Friedrichsb, Jongmin Kimc, Ralf Jungmannb, Richard Murraya, Erik Winfreec,d,e, and Friedrich C. Simmelb,1 )</b> | Elisa Francoa, Eike Friedrichsb, Jongmin Kimc, Ralf Jungmannb, Richard Murraya, Erik Winfreec,d,e, and Friedrich C. Simmelb,1 )</b> | ||
, or it would bind the PCR DNA template. In both cases, either transcription or PCR would lead to amplification of the signal. A transcription signal could be read with a nucleic acid binding dye, or could further linked to translation, to create a colored protein read-out such as aeBlue. Using transcription translation as an amplification of a detection into a colorimetric readout was successfully shown by Pardee et al.<b>cite Pardee</b> | , or it would bind the PCR DNA template. In both cases, either transcription or PCR would lead to amplification of the signal. A transcription signal could be read with a nucleic acid binding dye, or could further linked to translation, to create a colored protein read-out such as aeBlue. Using transcription translation as an amplification of a detection into a colorimetric readout was successfully shown by Pardee et al.<b>cite Pardee</b> | ||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
We designed a fitting inhibitor RNA and complementary DNA activator, and confirmed with Nupack<b>link to Nupack.com</b> that cleaving of the polyU loops would cause the dimer to melt at room temperature. The functional assembly of the RNA/DNA dimer could be proved by native PAGE.<b>insert NATIVE PAGE</b> We designed a double-stranded DNA template that is only single-stranded in its promoter region, so that it could be activated by the released ssDNA activator. Furthermore, the cornerstone for the transfer of the circuit to a colorimetric readout was laid by the successful cloning of aeBlue into a pSB1C3 backbone. This construct can be amplified, then cleaved with a type II restriction enzyme and a nuclease, so that the promoter region can be rendered single stranded. However, to this point we were not able to demonstrate that Cas13a activity, or even RNaseH, can successfully free the ssDNA activator. We think that the ssDNA/ssRNA ratio and the sequences could be optimized so that the dimer can be melted after RNA cleavage. We initially tried to prove that the dimer could be formed, and we may have overshot the design in the direction of dimer stability and binding efficiency. We also did not find a dye that gave us a very good read of the nucleic acids concentrations in such a dynamic system. We do not see a fundamental blockage to the possibility to develop this readout to the colorimetric readout, but we did not reach the full proof-of-concept within the time of our project. | We designed a fitting inhibitor RNA and complementary DNA activator, and confirmed with Nupack<b>link to Nupack.com</b> that cleaving of the polyU loops would cause the dimer to melt at room temperature. The functional assembly of the RNA/DNA dimer could be proved by native PAGE.<b>insert NATIVE PAGE</b> We designed a double-stranded DNA template that is only single-stranded in its promoter region, so that it could be activated by the released ssDNA activator. Furthermore, the cornerstone for the transfer of the circuit to a colorimetric readout was laid by the successful cloning of aeBlue into a pSB1C3 backbone. This construct can be amplified, then cleaved with a type II restriction enzyme and a nuclease, so that the promoter region can be rendered single stranded. However, to this point we were not able to demonstrate that Cas13a activity, or even RNaseH, can successfully free the ssDNA activator. We think that the ssDNA/ssRNA ratio and the sequences could be optimized so that the dimer can be melted after RNA cleavage. We initially tried to prove that the dimer could be formed, and we may have overshot the design in the direction of dimer stability and binding efficiency. We also did not find a dye that gave us a very good read of the nucleic acids concentrations in such a dynamic system. We do not see a fundamental blockage to the possibility to develop this readout to the colorimetric readout, but we did not reach the full proof-of-concept within the time of our project. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 174: | Line 165: | ||
<h3>Intein-Extein Readout</h3> | <h3>Intein-Extein Readout</h3> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | The Intein-Extein-Readout consists of 2 devices. A N- and a C- Terminal fragment of beta-Gal that are both linked to the respective halfs of an inactivated split intein, that can be activated by TEV-cleavage. The sequence of the split-intein was ordered as gblocks from IDT and inserted into psB1C3 and psB4A5 respectively. The successful insertion was confirmed by sequencing at GATC. The plasmids were then opened by BbsI and the coding sequence of beta-galactosidase was inserted via a Gibson-Assembly. The coding sequence originated from W3110 and was extracted by PCR with overlap primers. Once again, we confirmed the sequences at GATC and got full length reads for both constructs. However, the two biobricks could neither be submitted nor characterized, as the recloning to remove illegal cuts sites within the sequence was not finished prior to the deadline. The characterization was not possible, as the C-terminal fragment could not be expressed in any of our <i>E. coli</i> expression strains, as it seemed to be toxic. The toxicity seemed to not affect <i>E. coli </i> Turbo, which was used for cloning. The N-terminal part alone could not be characterized as the parts only work together. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> |
Revision as of 19:49, 1 November 2017
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|