Difference between revisions of "Team:Kyoto/HP/Silver"
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<p>We visited the Kyoto City Forestry Association and the Kyoto Osaka Forestry Association to listen to the measures taken in Kyoto City against pine-wilt disease and grasp the problems of the existing measures.<br> | <p>We visited the Kyoto City Forestry Association and the Kyoto Osaka Forestry Association to listen to the measures taken in Kyoto City against pine-wilt disease and grasp the problems of the existing measures.<br> | ||
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Kyoto/Integrated_Practices#Discussion with Forestry Association">To see more details of “ | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Kyoto/Integrated_Practices#Discussion with Forestry Association">To see more details of “ | ||
| − | + | Engaging professionals ” please click here.</a></p> | |
Revision as of 20:37, 1 November 2017
Human Practice/Silver
1) Engaging the general public
Through the following activities, we constantly drove our project with a general viewpoint by exchanging opinions and discussions with non-professionals as well as professionals.
- November Festival at Kyoto University 11/20/2015-11/24/2015
- Kansai Forum 2/19/2016
- May Festival at University of Tokyo 05/15/2016-05/16/2016
- Asia Pacific Conference 07/31/2017~08/04/2017
2) Engaging professionals
We visited the Kyoto City Forestry Association and the Kyoto Osaka Forestry Association to listen to the measures taken in Kyoto City against pine-wilt disease and grasp the problems of the existing measures.
To see more details of “
Engaging professionals ” please click here.
3) Forest survey
In order to know the current situation of pine-wilt disease in Kyoto, we actually went to mountains three times and ran a survey.
We also collected pine wood nematodes there as a survey.
To see more details of “
Forest survey ”
, please click here.
These activities fulfill Silver criteria.
