Line 1,717: | Line 1,717: | ||
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/95/T--IIT_Delhi--bifurcation_frequency.png" style='border:3px solid #000000' width = "95%"><br> | <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/95/T--IIT_Delhi--bifurcation_frequency.png" style='border:3px solid #000000' width = "95%"><br> | ||
<h6>Fig.2: Colour map representing bifurcation analysis w.r.t. amplitude </h6> | <h6>Fig.2: Colour map representing bifurcation analysis w.r.t. amplitude </h6> | ||
− | <br><h2> | + | <br><h2 id="pfont"> |
It is evident from Figs., 1 and 2 that the range of degradation rate over which the system oscillates increasing with increasing cooperativity. Thus, selecting a higher cooperativity would make the system more robust to variation in the degradation rate of the system.<br><br> | It is evident from Figs., 1 and 2 that the range of degradation rate over which the system oscillates increasing with increasing cooperativity. Thus, selecting a higher cooperativity would make the system more robust to variation in the degradation rate of the system.<br><br> | ||
To assess the extent to which the system response is close to a square wave, we define a ‘sqaureness’ metric. To compute the metric, we calculate the correlation between the system response and an ideal square wave with same period as the system. This correlation value is compared against the extent of squareness of a sinusoidal wave. The final squareness value captures the extent to which the system response is squarer than a sinusoidal signal.<br></h2> | To assess the extent to which the system response is close to a square wave, we define a ‘sqaureness’ metric. To compute the metric, we calculate the correlation between the system response and an ideal square wave with same period as the system. This correlation value is compared against the extent of squareness of a sinusoidal wave. The final squareness value captures the extent to which the system response is squarer than a sinusoidal signal.<br></h2> | ||
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/96/T--IIT_Delhi--bifurcation_squareness.png" style='border:3px solid #000000' width = "95%"><br> | <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/96/T--IIT_Delhi--bifurcation_squareness.png" style='border:3px solid #000000' width = "95%"><br> | ||
<h6> Fig.3: Colour map representing squareness </h6><br> | <h6> Fig.3: Colour map representing squareness </h6><br> | ||
− | <h2>We see that majority of the oscillatory region shows some square behavior. The maximum squareness is observed for high cooperativity values. Given Figs. 1, 2 and 3, we expect that a point selected in the mid to low degradation ranges for high cooperativity would sustain robust square like oscillations. | + | <h2 id="pfont">We see that majority of the oscillatory region shows some square behavior. The maximum squareness is observed for high cooperativity values. Given Figs. 1, 2 and 3, we expect that a point selected in the mid to low degradation ranges for high cooperativity would sustain robust square like oscillations. |
Revision as of 20:57, 1 November 2017
Bifurcation and Squareness