Difference between revisions of "Team:ETH Zurich/Design"

Line 80: Line 80:
 
         <li>We modelled the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Model/Heat_Sensor">heat diffusion</a> of 3 hours at 45 °C in tumor tissue. This way, we assessed whether such a procedure is acceptable for the healthy tissue surrounding the tumor. We performed this simulation because the heat sensors showed strongest responses to 45 °C and not 42 °C as initially expected.</li>
 
         <li>We modelled the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Model/Heat_Sensor">heat diffusion</a> of 3 hours at 45 °C in tumor tissue. This way, we assessed whether such a procedure is acceptable for the healthy tissue surrounding the tumor. We performed this simulation because the heat sensors showed strongest responses to 45 °C and not 42 °C as initially expected.</li>
 
          
 
          
     </ul>
+
     </ul>-->
  
  

Revision as of 00:02, 2 November 2017

Design

Here you can read about the design principles that helped us structure, organize and execute our project. To read about the story of how we developed the idea of CATE, go to Story of CATE. To skip this story and jump directly to how CATE is designed to treat tumors, see CATE in Action. For details about the circuit behind the functioning, visit our Circuit page.

Overview

We structured our work in phases and gradually proceeded through them. The phases apply to theoretical (models) as well as practical (experiments) work. In phase one, we get familiar with the details of the respective subjects. Based on existing data, we designed, ordered and built constructs for experimental procedures and further optimization. In phase two, we tested predictions of the models and generated data to fit their parameters. Optimization of single parts was guided by theoretical work in order to achieve functioning parts.

We designed the project in a hierarchical bottom-up engineering approach: We divided the circuit into its different functions (Fa-Fe) and engineered them until they met our criteria.

Circuit Functions:

The individual constructs were assembled by various molecular cloning techniques. Subsequently, functions were assessed with reporter genes such as sfGFP and mCherry. Only if they behaved according to our requirements, we coupled different functions. In parallel, we ordered the full genetic circuit of CATE with restriction sites along the critical loci in order to rapidly exchange promotors, ribosome binding sites or coding sequences after we experimentally optimized the parts.

We worked in parallel on the functions of CATE, which is why every function goes through the phases independently.

Plasmid creation during the CATE project

Phase I: Initial Design

In Phase I we considered previous work in order to design specific DNA sequences. Subsequently, we planned assembly of the parts into test devices. These were then used to develop assays that can be used to characterize the parts in vitro.

Plasmid creation during the CATE project
Plasmid Creation during the CATE project

Phase II: Tests and Optimization

In this phase the assays have been developed and show us if the function behaves as expected. At this point, we could therefore start to tune the functions. This was achieved by changing the expression levels of proteins with RBS libraries or different designs of a promotor.

Phase III: Demonstration of the function

Important experiments that show our system at work were performed with biological triplicates. The assays were kept the same as in phase II and Protocols are available. Find important results summarized on the Results page.