Jackarnold13 (Talk | contribs) |
Jackarnold13 (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
</font></p> | </font></p> | ||
− | + | <figure> | |
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/55/T-Northwestern--signalP.png" border="0"> | ||
+ | </center></figure> | ||
Revision as of 01:15, 2 November 2017
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9c/T--Northwestern--Experiments.png)
Packaging Cas9
In order to successfully package Cas9 into Outer Membrane Vesicles, we needed a source of OMVs. We transformed our saCas9 encoding plasmids into a hyper-vesiculating strain of E. coli known as JC8031. This strain is genetically engineered to create a large amount of OMVs and as a result, any substance whose concentration is high in the periplasm of the cell would also be expected to exist within the generated OMVs. The Cas9 itself also has a His6 tag attached for identification purposes, as well as a signal sequence meant to direct and secrete the protein into the periplasm.
Signaling Sequences
The following table includes the signalling sequences that we used and tested over the course of the summer. They are divided into the secretion pathway taken by the sequences, where an ambiguous sequence simply has a less defined pathway or may use multiple pathways.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/41/T-Northwestern--table.png)
In order to determine which secretion tags would be of most use to us, and because the tag is expected to detach from the Cas9 protein after successful delivery to the periplasm, we performed Signal Immunoprecipitation (IP) on our signalling sequences. This analysis gave us information regarding where the cleavage of the tag from the protein would most likely occur and what the likelihood is of this event occurring. Below is an example of a Signal IP for PelB which is one of our more useful secretion tags.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/55/T-Northwestern--signalP.png)