SKammerman (Talk | contribs) |
SKammerman (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<h3>Overview</h3> | <h3>Overview</h3> | ||
Directly comparing measurements is a challenge for many synthetic biology researchers. Fluorescent measurement is difficult for researchers to compare because it can be analyzed and reported in a variety of ways. Through the InterLab 2017 study, the iGEM Measurement Committee seeks to provide researchers with a standard for measuring expression of GFP in a plate reader. | Directly comparing measurements is a challenge for many synthetic biology researchers. Fluorescent measurement is difficult for researchers to compare because it can be analyzed and reported in a variety of ways. Through the InterLab 2017 study, the iGEM Measurement Committee seeks to provide researchers with a standard for measuring expression of GFP in a plate reader. | ||
− | <br> | + | <br><br> |
iGEM Teams worldwide contributed to the InterLab study by transforming DH5a E. coli with six test devices (BBa_J364000, BBa_J364001, BBa_J364002, BBa_J364003, BBa_J364004, and BBa_J364005), as well as a positive (BBa_I20270), and negative control (BBa_R0040). Teams then measured the fluorescence of the bacteria in a plate reader over a 6-hour period. | iGEM Teams worldwide contributed to the InterLab study by transforming DH5a E. coli with six test devices (BBa_J364000, BBa_J364001, BBa_J364002, BBa_J364003, BBa_J364004, and BBa_J364005), as well as a positive (BBa_I20270), and negative control (BBa_R0040). Teams then measured the fluorescence of the bacteria in a plate reader over a 6-hour period. | ||
Latest revision as of 01:26, 2 November 2017