It is estimated that about 95% of nanoparticles used in consumer products end up in wastewater (Kiser et al. 2009). Our goal is to apply our biofilm and Proteorhodopsin (PR) bacteria in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to remove most nanoparticles (NPs) before the effluent is released into the environment.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
What is the process?
When wastewater enters a plant, the first step is to remove coarse solids and large materials using a grit screen (figure___). The water can then be processed in three main stages: Primary, Secondary, and sometimes Tertiary Treatment (Pescod 1992). In Primary Treatment, heavy solids are removed by sedimentation, and floating materials (such as oils) can be taken out by skimming. However, dissolved materials and colloids—small, evenly dispersed solids such as nanoparticles—are not removed here (Pescod 1992). Secondary Treatment generally involves the use of aeration tanks, where aerobic microbes help to break down organic materials. This is also known as the activated sludge process (Davis 2005). In a subsequent sedimentation step, the microbes are removed and the effluent is disinfected (often by chlorine or UV) before it is released into the environment. In certain WWTPs, wastewater may go through Tertiary Treatment, an advanced process typically aimed to remove nitrogen and phosphorous, and assumed to produce an effluent free of viruses. However, Tertiary Treatment requires additional infrastructure that is expensive and complex, limiting its global usage (Pescod 1992; Malik 2014).
We plan to add our bacteria either in the deep aeration tanks or the secondary sedimentation tanks. The disinfection tank will kill the bacteria used in previous tanks.Figure: Christine C.
We plan to add our bacteria either in the deep aeration tanks or the secondary sedimentation tanks. The disinfection tank will kill the bacteria used in previous tanks.Figure: Christine C.
Biosafety
We have chosen to use a safe and common lab strain of E. coli, K-12, as our chassis (Environmental Protection Agency 1977). In both approaches, our constructs do not express proteins associated with virulence: PR is a membrane protein that commonly exists in marine bacteria, and for biofilm production we were careful to avoid known virulence factors such as alpha hemolysins (Fattahi et al. 2015). Most importantly, biosafety is built into WWTPs. Before treated effluent is released back into the environment, it must go through a final disinfection step, where chlorine, ozone, or UV radiation are used to kill microbes still present in the wastewater (Pescod 1992).
APPLYING PR IN WWTPs
To achieve our goal of applying biofilms in WWTPs, we need to inform WWTP managers on the amount of biofilm necessary to trap their desired amount of NPs. Thus, we devised two experiments to investigate the effect of 1) biofilm volume and 2) biofilm surface area on NP trapping; the results of these experiments were incorporated into our model. (Learn more about modeling here!)
APPLYING BIOFILM IN WWTPs
Volume Does Not Affect NP Trapping
To test the effects of biofilm volume, E. coli biofilms were grown, extracted, and washed as described in the Experimental page. Then, 10 mL of Gold NP (AuNP) solution was added to different volumes of biofilm (figure ______). The containers were shaken at 100 rpm overnight to maximize interaction between the biofilm and AuNPs. Because AuNP solution is purple in color, we could take absorbance measurements and convert these values to AuNP concentration using a standard curve (figure ______). Finally, the mixtures were transferred to conical tubes and centrifuged to isolate the supernatant, which contains free AuNPs quantifiable using a spectrophotometer set at 527 nm.
We plan to add our bacteria either in the deep aeration tanks or the secondary sedimentation tanks. The disinfection tank will kill the bacteria used in previous tanks.Figure: Christine C.
Adding more than 1 mL of biofilm to the same amount of AuNP solution did not trap more AuNPs (figure _____). We observed that 1 mL of biofilm was just enough to fully cover the bottom of the container. Since only the top of the biofilm directly contacted the AuNP solution, increasing biofilm volume beyond 1 mL simply increased the depth and not the contact area between biofilm and AuNPs. We concluded that biofilm volume is not a main factor determining NP removal.
Surface Area Affects NP Trapping Rate
Next, we tested the effects of surface area on NP removal. Similar to the previous experiment, biofilms were extracted and washed. Two experimental groups were set up in different sized cylinders, with either a small (~1.5 cm2) or big (~9 cm2) base area (figure ____). The bottom 0.5 cm of each container was covered by biofilm, then 10 mL of AuNP solution was added. In this case, the depth of biofilm is consistent, and the contact area between AuNPs and biofilm is equal to the area of the container’s base. All containers were shaken at 100 rpm at room temperature. Every hour (for a total of five hours), one replicate from each group was centrifuged and the absorbance of free AuNPs in the supernatant was measured at 527 nm.
BIOFILM PROTOTYPE
Maximize NP-Biofilm Contact Area
Maximize Adaptability to Existing Infrastructure
Biofilm Prototype in a WWTP Model
REFERENCES
Ahamed, M., Alsalhi, M. S., & Siddiqui, M. (2010). Silver nanoparticle applications and human health. Clinica Chimica Acta,411(23-24), 1841-1848. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.016
Marr, L. C., & Holder, A. L. (2013). Nanomaterial disposal by incineration. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 15(9), 1652-1664. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00224A