Team:Bristol/Experiments
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Interlab Study
The first few weeks of our Wet Lab work was spent completing the Interlab Study. You can see our results on our Interlab Study page.
PCR for Nap and Nrf fragments
The first stage of our Wet Lab work was to optimise the Nrf and Nap operons to be BioBrick compatible. This involved removing specific restriction sites, adding spacers, add most importantly adding the BioBrick prefix and suffix (more detail on our Design page). As these modifications would have taken significant time in the lab, we decided to get our constructs synthesised by IDT. After waiting a few weeks, we were informed that the synthesis was not possible. Therefore, we split each operon into 4 fragments (made to be easier to synthesise), which we could assemble ourselves using Gibson assembly to obtain the full constructs.
On receiving our Nap and Nrf fragments, we first had to amplify the fragments by PCR to have enough template for Gibson assembly. Unfortunately this was not as straight-forward as it first seemed. It took us a total of 1 month to achieve clean, purified products of all of our fragments, apart from Nrf3 which still presents problems. Overall, three weeks of this stage was spent optimising the PCR for using Phusion polymerase (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Agarose gel of all amplified Nap and Nrf fragments and the pSB1K3 vector used for cloning. 1 kbp ladder (NEB).
Multiple Gibson Assemblies of Nap and Nrf fragments were attempted with the Phusion-derived PCR products, however these consistently resulted in colonies with only re-circularised plasmids (as determined by colony PCR). With only a few weeks remaining, we decided to move away from Gibson assembly, and attempt overlapping PCR instead to combine our fragments.
We attempted overlapping PCR with all fragments in the reaction together, however this yielded no results. Therefore, we decided to use a simpler, sequential method, combining only two fragments at a time. We used a variant of overlapping PCR whereby the first 10 cycles are run without any primers. This allows the homology regions of the fragments to anneal, leaving free 3’ ends for the polymerase to elongate, resulting in full dsDNA templates of the combined fragments. A further 25 cycles are run with the addition of primers flanking the two fragments, thereby amplifying the joint fragments. We managed to assemble Nap1 -DT and Nap2 using this method (Fig. 2), however due to non-specificity of our primers, many other incorrect assemblies were present in the mix (Fig 2.A). Even after gel extracting our band of interest (Fig 2.B), and amplifying this with PCR, the nonspecific bands returned (Fig 2.C), preventing us from continuing with this method.
Fig. 2. A) Agarose gel of overlapping-PCR products. Combinations of fragments are indicated at the top of each lane. Differing annealing temperatures for duplicates of Nap12H and Nap12-DT are indicated. The band circled in blue is the expected size (~ 3.7 kbp) of assembled Nap1-DT (1.8 kbp) and Nap 2 (1.9 kbp). 1 kbp ladder (NEB). B) Agarose gel of the total remaining product of Nap12-DT overlapping PCR (60°) for gel extraction. Band to be excised is highlighted in blue. C) PCR of the product from gel extraction. Nap12-DT is highlighted in blue, and all other bands are nonspecific products.
Our luck changed when we discovered an alternative polymerase to use in our PCRs. We discovered this when testing two polymerases, Ultra and Hi-Fi (PCR BIO), to try to obtain better quality PCR products (Fig. 3), as Phusion was giving impure products. This test showed that Ultra was clearly much better suited to our templates, which would be expected as it has been engineered to have greater activity on difficult templates.
Fig. 3. Agarose gel of PCR products on Nrf2 (lanes 2-5) and Nap2 (lanes 6-9) testing Hi-Fi (lane 5) and Ultra (lane 9), with Phusion as a control. 1 kbp marker.
We therefore decided to re-run all of our fragments using Ultra polymerase (Fig. 4), in order to obtain purer PCR products, and to improve our chances of Gibson assembly working. Amplification of Nrf3 however still remained poor.
Fig. 4. Agarose gel of the final purified PCR products of all fragments using Ultra polymerase. 1 kbp marker.
Fig. 5. A) Coomassie stain of total protein from 2 pink colony cell extracts. B) Restriction digest of miniprep plasmid. C) Sequencing results indicated full RFP coding sequence within a pSB1K3 plasmid (VF2 and VR primers).
Overlapping PCR
Discovering Ultra
Returning to Gibson and Investigating Pink Cells
Now with much purer fragments, we repeated our Gibson assembly experiments. Although none of our colony PCRs gave promising results, we obtained two Nap colonies which were bright pink in colour (shown right). We decided to investigate this as it could potentially be a positive result, given that the Nap operon construct does not contain the LacI gene and could therefore be constitutively expressed, and with the operon containing FeS and Heme proteins, could produce coloured proteins.
Western blotting for the V5-tagged NapA protein gave negative results (not shown), and coomassie staining of a duplicate gel indicated that the main overexpressed protein was ~30 kDa (Fig. 5A), too small for NapA. Furthermore, restriction digestion of the plasmid minipreps of these colonies showed an insert of ~1.3 kbp (Fig. 5B), smaller than the expected 6.5 kbp of the Nap operon. The mystery was answered once we got our sequencing results (Fig. 5C), which told us our plasmid contained RFP. This was due to presence of the original BBa_J04450 pSB1K3 plasmid within our plasmid stock, which we did not digest with Dpn1, meaning there was always a small chance this plasmid could be transformed into the E. coli yielding our pink cells.
