Difference between revisions of "Team:UNOTT/Collaborations"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
} | } | ||
| − | + | p { | |
text-align: center; | text-align: center; | ||
} | } | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<h3> #2 - Revival collaboration </h3> | <h3> #2 - Revival collaboration </h3> | ||
| − | <p> In September, we sent our freeze-dried cells out to Groningen, Sheffield and Edinburgh in order to see how reliable the fluorescence from our keys can be read after revival using a set method. </p> | + | <p style="text-align:center;"> In September, we sent our freeze-dried cells out to Groningen, Sheffield and Edinburgh in order to see how reliable the fluorescence from our keys can be read after revival using a set method. </p> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9d/T--UNOTT--boxessheffgroningen.jpeg"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9d/T--UNOTT--boxessheffgroningen.jpeg"> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
Revision as of 15:08, 29 September 2017
COLLABORATIONS
#1 - Bristol Collaboration
We have collaborated with the 2017 UK Bristol iGEM team this summer in order to use and test their new tool called the 'iGEM Development Environment' also known as 'IDE'.
#2 - Revival collaboration
In September, we sent our freeze-dried cells out to Groningen, Sheffield and Edinburgh in order to see how reliable the fluorescence from our keys can be read after revival using a set method.
