(Text on the PacBio talk) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="contentbox"> | ||
+ | <div class="content"> | ||
+ | <span class="anchor-jump" id="biosafety"></span> | ||
+ | <div class="section"></div> | ||
+ | <h3> Biosafety Report </h3> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- Normaler Text --> | ||
+ | <article> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Many teams need to deal with biosafety issues during the competition. Is our organism hazardous? What will happen if it escapes from lab? For this reason the iGEM HQ offers various opportunities to obtain information like the safety policies, safe lab work guidelines or the white list of allowed organisms. Further, many teams are working on the development of multilateral biosafety systems to prevent the release or at least the survival of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the environment. With the intention to summarize all relevant levels of biosafety systems, we worked on our biosafety review article: Auxotrophy to Xeno-DNA: An Exploration of Combinatorial Mechanisms for a High-Fidelity Biosafety System for Synthetic Biology Applications. Biosafety can begin on different levels, starting from a bioreactor to a complete synthetic DNA. In our review, we describe different containment approaches previously attempted by former iGEM teams. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As the report is currently under peer review, it cannot be printed here. Instead, we composed a shortened version of its content, which can be accessed here. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </article> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<div class="contentbox"> | <div class="contentbox"> |
Revision as of 21:21, 29 October 2017
Human Practice Silver
Biosafety Report
ChImp Report
Literature Workshop
Figure 1: Some impressions of our literature workshop.