Difference between revisions of "Team:Arizona State/Improve"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| − | <b>The improvement of F2620 receiver:</b>This year's team conducted multiple experiments to re-characterize a new and improved F2620, or Lux receiver. The improved part can be viewed <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_F2620:Experience">here</a> on the iGEM registry page. </p> | + | <p><b>The improvement of F2620 receiver:</b>This year's team conducted multiple experiments to re-characterize a new and improved F2620, or Lux receiver. The improved part can be viewed <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_F2620:Experience">here</a> on the iGEM registry page. </p> |
<p>The graphs below depict the GFP production from the F2620 receiver to be higher at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Las. The second graph, depicts the same nature however at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Lux. It is interesting to note that the Las sender, at a lower concentration, promotes a higher GFP expression than the Lux. Our group hypothesized that it would be opposite considering the LuxI sender comes from the same system as F2620. These results show differently.</p> | <p>The graphs below depict the GFP production from the F2620 receiver to be higher at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Las. The second graph, depicts the same nature however at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Lux. It is interesting to note that the Las sender, at a lower concentration, promotes a higher GFP expression than the Lux. Our group hypothesized that it would be opposite considering the LuxI sender comes from the same system as F2620. These results show differently.</p> | ||
Revision as of 02:03, 1 November 2017
