Difference between revisions of "Team:Queens Canada/Results"

Line 51: Line 51:
 
<div class="column full_size" >
 
<div class="column full_size" >
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/3f/T--Queens_Canada--ResultsBanner.jpeg">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/3f/T--Queens_Canada--ResultsBanner.jpeg">
 +
 +
<div style="background-color:#afbee8;color:black;font-weight:100;padding:50px 50px 50px 50px;line-height:150%;">
  
 
<h1>Results</h1>
 
<h1>Results</h1>
Line 65: Line 67:
  
  
 +
</div>
  
</body>
 
</style>
 
  
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 17:15, 23 October 2017

Results

MhLap Dextran Binding

The first step in assessing the feasibility of using dextran to crosslink M. hydrocarbonoclasticus to our biofilm was to test the ability of this bacterium’s sugar binding domain to bind dextran. Luckily, Tyler Vance of Dr. Davies’ lab already had the sugar-binding MhLap Region III cloned into pET-28 for overexpression in E. coli. We expressed, then purified this construct using a Ni-NTA column. Purified MhLap Region III fractions were pooled. We then set up a simple affinity chromatography binding assay. A Pasteur pipette was filled half-way with sephadex G-200 slurry. Purified MhLap was then added, followed by five washes with buffer. We then washed twice with 5 mg/mL dextran solution. Finally, the column was washed twice with EDTA to nonspecifically elute all protein. The collected fractions can be seen in the following SDS gels:

Fig 1. MhLap dextran binding experiment gels. From left to right, the lanes contain flow through (FT), buffer washes 1-5, dextran (5 mg/mL) washes 1-2, and 1M EDTA washes 1-2.