Difference between revisions of "Team:Freiburg/Cloning"
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/df/.png" alt="" height="100%" width="100%"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/df/.png" alt="" height="100%" width="100%"> | ||
<div class="figurecaption"> | <div class="figurecaption"> | ||
| − | <p><strong> | + | <p><strong>Fig. 1: Summary of cloning strategy to generate plasmids suitable for transient transfection. </strong><br> |
Shown are plasmids type one, that can already be used for promoter characterization pretests. Plasmids type two, that were built as subcloning plasmids to be assembled with plasmids type one into plasmids type three. Plasmids type four were generated by ligating four enhancer elements in succession, built by compatible end assembly, into plasmids type three. </p> | Shown are plasmids type one, that can already be used for promoter characterization pretests. Plasmids type two, that were built as subcloning plasmids to be assembled with plasmids type one into plasmids type three. Plasmids type four were generated by ligating four enhancer elements in succession, built by compatible end assembly, into plasmids type three. </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| − | <div class=" | + | <div class="image_box middle"> |
| − | <img src="" height="" width=""> | + | <div class="figure"> |
| + | <div class="figureinner"> | ||
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/df/.png" alt="" height="100%" width="100%"> | ||
<div class="figurecaption"> | <div class="figurecaption"> | ||
| − | <p>< | + | <p><strong>Fig. 2:Summary of cloning strategy to generate transfer plasmids for lentiviral transduction.</strong><br> |
| + | Plasmids type four were used as template to clone the constructs into transfer plasmids for lentiviral transduction. </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | + | In the fourth step, the assembled plasmids were cloned into a transfer plasmid via Gibson Assembly. | |
| + | </p> | ||
| Line 67: | Line 73: | ||
<h2>Cloning results</h2> | <h2>Cloning results</h2> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | The strategy described above was designed to generate compatible plasmids for easy exchange for e.g. reporter proteins. | + | The strategy described above was designed to generate compatible plasmids for easy exchange, for e.g. reporter proteins or selection markers, providing us with our own cloning standard. During the time in the lab the following constructs were cloned. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 00:52, 28 October 2017
Cloning
Cloning strategy
Our aim was to develop a cloning strategy providing us with plasmids that could be used for transient expression, to perform pretests of our CARTELTM AND gate, and as templates to generate transfer plasmids for lentiviral transduction. This resulted in the following cloning strategy.
Fig. 1: Summary of cloning strategy to generate plasmids suitable for transient transfection.
Shown are plasmids type one, that can already be used for promoter characterization pretests. Plasmids type two, that were built as subcloning plasmids to be assembled with plasmids type one into plasmids type three. Plasmids type four were generated by ligating four enhancer elements in succession, built by compatible end assembly, into plasmids type three.
As a first step, two plasmid types were generated. Plasmid type number one, assembled via Gibson Assembly, contained from 5’ end to 3’ direction one of the enhancers (HRE/CRE/NFAT), a minimal promoter to ensure better recruitment of the transcription machinery, one reporter protein (eCFP/SEAP/Luciferase) and a polyA signal sequence. The polyA signal was included to ensure better release of the transcribed mRNA from the transcription machinery and longer mRNA half-life (Hager et al., 2008). These plasmids were already suitable for pretests but were lacking a transfection control or a selection marker for lentiviral transduction.
The second plasmid type, also assembled via Gibson Assembly, contained from 5’ end to 3’ a constitutive promoter (CMV/SV40), a selection marker (mCherry/Zeocin/Neomycin) and a polyA signal sequence. These plasmids sole purpose was to be assembled with type one into type three plasmids. In a second step, plasmids type one and type two were assembled via a Gibson assembly into type three plasmids.
Considering that the enhancers one may only lead to very weak transactivation and therefore low reporter gene expression, plasmids containing an enhancer flanked by compatible restriction sites, suitable for compatible end assembly, were designed. To generate four enhancer elements in succession, compatible end assembly was performed twice. Additionally, two restriction sites, that were compatible with type three plasmids, were included, so that in a third step, type three plasmids and the four enhancer elements in succession could be combined via T4 ligation.
Fig. 2:Summary of cloning strategy to generate transfer plasmids for lentiviral transduction.
Plasmids type four were used as template to clone the constructs into transfer plasmids for lentiviral transduction.
In the fourth step, the assembled plasmids were cloned into a transfer plasmid via Gibson Assembly.
Cloning results
The strategy described above was designed to generate compatible plasmids for easy exchange, for e.g. reporter proteins or selection markers, providing us with our own cloning standard. During the time in the lab the following constructs were cloned.
