Difference between revisions of "PASantiago Chile/results"

Line 16: Line 16:
 
 
 
}
 
}
 +
 +
                p.human {
 +
                     
 +
                        text-align: justify;
 +
                        font-size: 15px;
 +
                        margin: 2% 17% 2% 14%;
 +
                        line-height: 2;
 +
                        font-family: raleway, helvetica;
 +
                        font-weight: 300;
 +
                h1 {
 +
                        font-family: didot, raleway, helvetica;
 +
                        font-weight: 400;
 +
}
 +
 +
                h2 {
 +
 +
                      font-size: 20px;
 +
                      font-family: didot, raleway, helvetica;
 +
                        font-weight: 400;
 +
}
 +
 +
}
  
 
}
 
}
Line 30: Line 52:
  
 
<section id="uno">
 
<section id="uno">
 +
 +
<h1 style= "color:black; margin-top: 181px;text-align: center;margin-bottom: 9%;">
 +
Results</h1>
 +
 +
<p class="human">
 +
 +
First we prove that the sequences were correct and then we sent to synthesize to IDT.
 +
<br>
 +
When we received the DNA, it was resuspended correctly, for the posterior double digest of every part. Which also worked well.
 +
<br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/68/Resultasess.jpg" style="margin-top: 31px;">
 +
 +
 +
</p>
  
  
 
</section>
 
</section>

Revision as of 00:22, 2 November 2017


Results

First we prove that the sequences were correct and then we sent to synthesize to IDT.
When we received the DNA, it was resuspended correctly, for the posterior double digest of every part. Which also worked well.