Difference between revisions of "Team:Munich/Results"

Line 168: Line 168:
 
In our project, we first successfully replicated the Cas13a-based detection of RNA pathogens that was demonstrated by Gootenberg et al. (2017). We thoroughly characterized the target detection limit for different bacterial and viral targets, from <i> in vitro </i> and <i> in vivo </i> sources, and proved the possibility to discriminate between viruses and bacteria with high specificity. We found that our detection circuit worked robustly across experimental conditions and experimenters, which proves that the readout is adapted for distribution and handling by non-trained users. <br>
 
In our project, we first successfully replicated the Cas13a-based detection of RNA pathogens that was demonstrated by Gootenberg et al. (2017). We thoroughly characterized the target detection limit for different bacterial and viral targets, from <i> in vitro </i> and <i> in vivo </i> sources, and proved the possibility to discriminate between viruses and bacteria with high specificity. We found that our detection circuit worked robustly across experimental conditions and experimenters, which proves that the readout is adapted for distribution and handling by non-trained users. <br>
 
We laid the groundwork for colorimetric read-outs that will add another layer of amplification in our cascade detection (gold nanoparticles, intein-extein and ssDNA amplification). Those readouts should allow for a practical readability of the diagnosis by the user without the need of digital analysis. Additionally, their amplification scheme should also lower the detection limit of the Cas13a without the need for pre-amplification of the target.  </p><p>
 
We laid the groundwork for colorimetric read-outs that will add another layer of amplification in our cascade detection (gold nanoparticles, intein-extein and ssDNA amplification). Those readouts should allow for a practical readability of the diagnosis by the user without the need of digital analysis. Additionally, their amplification scheme should also lower the detection limit of the Cas13a without the need for pre-amplification of the target.  </p><p>
However, we developed in parallel a scheme for amplifying the target using isothermal amplification (RPA) and transcription. This was motivated by our modeling work, which determined a detection limit in the range of the one found experimentally (around 10nM), and quantified the improvement we could expect from a cascade amplification, from <i>in vivo</i> DNA to RNA  to readout. RPA worked well from <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> DNA sources, and the combination of RPA and transcription on paper was efficient enough to overcome our readout detection limit.<br>
+
However, we developed in parallel a scheme for amplifying the target using isothermal amplification (RPA) and transcription. This was motivated by our modeling work, which determined a detection limit in the range of the one found experimentally (around 10nM), and quantified the improvement we could expect from a cascade amplification, from <i>in vivo</i> DNA to RNA  to readout. RPA worked well from <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> DNA sources, and the combination of RPA and transcription on paper was efficient enough to overcome our readout detection limit.</p><p>
We built a  fluorescence detector with high sensitivity to cost ratio, and used it successfully to detect Cas13a activity. However, the product itself needs to be redesigned for market distribution: in general, a fluorescence detector is not necessarily user-friendly, the extraction of the RNA on chip needs to be optimized, and the costs of the whole product must be lowered. </p><p>
+
We built a  fluorescence detector that is to our knowledge, the cheapest and most sensitive ever built by an iGEM team, and provides a reasonable alternative to commercial plate readers. We used it successfully to detect Cas13a activity on paper, from <i>in vitro</i> transcribed RNA pathogen. However, the product itself may need to be redesigned for market distribution: in general, a fluorescence detector is not necessarily user-friendly, the extraction of the RNA on chip needs to be optimized, and the costs of the whole product must be lowered. </p><p>
Nevertheless, we are glad to have created a functional platform that allows the detection of nanomolar concentrations of a pathogen's RNA within 30 minutes. With our modular approach, we have shown at least proof-of-concept results for each part, and are confident that no fundamental gap prevents our platform from being usable, only optimization.  
+
Nevertheless, we are glad to have created a functional platform that allows the detection of nanomolar concentrations of a pathogen's RNA within 30 minutes. With our modular approach, we have shown at least proof-of-concept results for each part, and are confident that no fundamental gap prevents our platform from being fully integrated.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 178: Line 178:
 
<h1>Outlook</h1>
 
<h1>Outlook</h1>
 
<p>   
 
<p>   
We still have some project sections that we need to improve in the future. We have therefore listed the following points that need to be optimized below.
+
We still have some modules that need improvement in the future. We have therefore listed the following points that need to be optimized below.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
   <ul class="listResults">
 
   <ul class="listResults">
          <li><i> In vivo </i> heat lysis: During our experiments, we realized that the RNA extraction of <i> E. coli </i> using heat lysis is not always optimal for our experimental setup due to the fact that we have RNase contamination in the extracted RNA samples. Although our Cas13a cleavage assays are performed in presence of RNase Inhibitor to suppress the activity of the RNases that could be present, we observed that the heat lysed samples show relatively higher fluorescence activity in comparison to the phenol-chloroform extracted samples.</li>
+
<li>Positive and negative controls in the readout: We occasionally found that high target concentrations led to signals above the positive control (which could be due to the degradation and lesser activity of RNaseA used for this control) and that low target concentrations could lead to signals below negative control (which could be due to noise at low fluorescence intensities) For proper quantification of the percentage of cleaved RNaseAlert, the controls should be standardized.</li>       
           <li>RNA extraction and amplification: The RNA extraction from <i> Bacillus subtilis </i> was particularly difficult in our case since <i> B. subtilis </i> is a gram positive, spore forming bacterium. Also, the amount and the quality of the RNA extracted from the <i> B. subtilis </i> and <i> E.coli </i> cultures were not sufficiently good. We therefore should find methods to improve either the RNA extraction protocol or use a better amplification steps after the extraction.</li>
+
<li><i> In vivo </i> heat lysis: During our experiments, we realized that the direct use of the RNA extracted from <i> E. coli </i> using heat lysis can lead to RNase contamination. Although our Cas13a cleavage assays are performed in presence of RNase Inhibitor to suppress the activity of the RNases that could be present, we observed that the heat lysed samples show relatively higher fluorescence activity in comparison to the phenol-chloroform extracted samples.</li>
           <li>Cost of the chip: Now, the cost of our chip is less than 15$ per unit. We could still try to minimize the costs by reducing the chip size and making it fully recyclable. However, at the industrial level one could potentially reduce the cost of the chip.</li>
+
           <li>RNA extraction and amplification: The RNA extracted from <i> Bacillus subtilis </i> lead to unstable results, giving sometimes higher than positive control signals, sometimes very noisy kinetics. As this is a gram positive bacteria, we think some further characterization must be done on the efficiency of heat lysis of different type of cells. In all cases, the RNA should be amplified after lysis and before detection, as pathogens are often present below our detection limit of 10nM in real samples.</li>
           <li>Lyophilization of Cas13a: We also figured out that the lyophilization protocol of the Cas13a has to be improved in order to make our paper chip portable and sustainable. We also tried drying the Cas13a with the tardigrade intrinsically disordered proteins (TDPs) from Team TU Delft but still it was not that effective as expected. Therefore, we have to integrate some better methods to lyophilize the Cas13a without losing its activity.</li>
+
           <li>Cost of the chip: At the moment, the cost of our reusable detection unit is less than 15$ per unit. We could still try to minimize the costs by reducing the chip size and making it fully recyclable. We should characterize the life-time of the detector, to see how its cost is buffered by the number of tests that can be conducted with one detector. However, at the industrial level one could easily reduce the overall cost of CascAID by scaling up of the production.</li>
           <li>Readouts with color and amplification: The colorimetric readout is also something we need to work on and improve since we only managed to partially succeed with the colorimetric assays. We however think that it is possible to realize this using more elegant ways of RNA detection and this is something we could try in future.</li>
+
           <li>Lyophilization of Cas13a: the lyophilization protocol of the Cas13a has to be improved in order to make our paper chip portable and sustainable. We tried drying the Cas13a with the tardigrade intrinsically disordered proteins (TDPs) from Team TU Delft, as a cryoprotectant, but this lead to increased basal activity, rendering the detection less sensitive. Other cryoprotectants should be tried, and the stability of freeze-dried samples over a year should be assessed. </li>
           <li>Integration of all the modules of the platform: Although all our modules parts are functional, we were only able to integrate them partially. So, with more time, we believe that we can have a fully functional and integrated module system.  
+
           <li>Readouts with color and amplification: The colorimetric readouts need continued work, and possibly improved design, since we only managed to partially succeed with the assays. We however think that it is possible to realize this using more elegant ways of RNA detection.</li>
 +
           <li>Integration of all the modules of the platform: Although all our modules parts are functional, and locally integrated, we did not reach full integration into a unique object. However, we believe we only need more time to assemble a fully functional and integrated module system.  
 
</li>
 
</li>
 
   </ul>
 
   </ul>

Revision as of 02:18, 2 November 2017


Final Results

Overview

We successfully designed, constructed and characterized each module of our platform: the sample processing, the readout circuit, and the detection of pathogens.
Although did not fully integrate all parts together in the time frame of our project, we could connect each unit to the next, so that we are confident that our entire platform is functional. For example, we could achieve equally sensitive bulk detection of pathogen RNA from in vitro and in vivo sources, and were later able to detect in vitro RNA with lyophilized Cas13a on paper, therefore we believe RNA from lysed cells can be detected on paper. In this overview, we list our achievements and where we faced issues, and we present a summary of the characterization of each module in the sub-pages.

What worked

Detection of E. coli 16S rRNA from Cas13a on paper in our self-built detector

What presented issues

Discussion

Our project CascAID is a universal solution for low cost, point of care diagnostics of infectious diseases. Currently, the available diagnostic tools are based on PCR, antibodies or microbiological methods which all need trained personal and lab equipment. Therefore, these methods are cost and time consuming. This gives rise to the need of developing effective, affordable and portable devices.

In our project, we first successfully replicated the Cas13a-based detection of RNA pathogens that was demonstrated by Gootenberg et al. (2017). We thoroughly characterized the target detection limit for different bacterial and viral targets, from in vitro and in vivo sources, and proved the possibility to discriminate between viruses and bacteria with high specificity. We found that our detection circuit worked robustly across experimental conditions and experimenters, which proves that the readout is adapted for distribution and handling by non-trained users.
We laid the groundwork for colorimetric read-outs that will add another layer of amplification in our cascade detection (gold nanoparticles, intein-extein and ssDNA amplification). Those readouts should allow for a practical readability of the diagnosis by the user without the need of digital analysis. Additionally, their amplification scheme should also lower the detection limit of the Cas13a without the need for pre-amplification of the target.

However, we developed in parallel a scheme for amplifying the target using isothermal amplification (RPA) and transcription. This was motivated by our modeling work, which determined a detection limit in the range of the one found experimentally (around 10nM), and quantified the improvement we could expect from a cascade amplification, from in vivo DNA to RNA to readout. RPA worked well from in vivo and in vitro DNA sources, and the combination of RPA and transcription on paper was efficient enough to overcome our readout detection limit.

We built a fluorescence detector that is to our knowledge, the cheapest and most sensitive ever built by an iGEM team, and provides a reasonable alternative to commercial plate readers. We used it successfully to detect Cas13a activity on paper, from in vitro transcribed RNA pathogen. However, the product itself may need to be redesigned for market distribution: in general, a fluorescence detector is not necessarily user-friendly, the extraction of the RNA on chip needs to be optimized, and the costs of the whole product must be lowered.

Nevertheless, we are glad to have created a functional platform that allows the detection of nanomolar concentrations of a pathogen's RNA within 30 minutes. With our modular approach, we have shown at least proof-of-concept results for each part, and are confident that no fundamental gap prevents our platform from being fully integrated.

Outlook

We still have some modules that need improvement in the future. We have therefore listed the following points that need to be optimized below.

  • Positive and negative controls in the readout: We occasionally found that high target concentrations led to signals above the positive control (which could be due to the degradation and lesser activity of RNaseA used for this control) and that low target concentrations could lead to signals below negative control (which could be due to noise at low fluorescence intensities) For proper quantification of the percentage of cleaved RNaseAlert, the controls should be standardized.
  • In vivo heat lysis: During our experiments, we realized that the direct use of the RNA extracted from E. coli using heat lysis can lead to RNase contamination. Although our Cas13a cleavage assays are performed in presence of RNase Inhibitor to suppress the activity of the RNases that could be present, we observed that the heat lysed samples show relatively higher fluorescence activity in comparison to the phenol-chloroform extracted samples.
  • RNA extraction and amplification: The RNA extracted from Bacillus subtilis lead to unstable results, giving sometimes higher than positive control signals, sometimes very noisy kinetics. As this is a gram positive bacteria, we think some further characterization must be done on the efficiency of heat lysis of different type of cells. In all cases, the RNA should be amplified after lysis and before detection, as pathogens are often present below our detection limit of 10nM in real samples.
  • Cost of the chip: At the moment, the cost of our reusable detection unit is less than 15$ per unit. We could still try to minimize the costs by reducing the chip size and making it fully recyclable. We should characterize the life-time of the detector, to see how its cost is buffered by the number of tests that can be conducted with one detector. However, at the industrial level one could easily reduce the overall cost of CascAID by scaling up of the production.
  • Lyophilization of Cas13a: the lyophilization protocol of the Cas13a has to be improved in order to make our paper chip portable and sustainable. We tried drying the Cas13a with the tardigrade intrinsically disordered proteins (TDPs) from Team TU Delft, as a cryoprotectant, but this lead to increased basal activity, rendering the detection less sensitive. Other cryoprotectants should be tried, and the stability of freeze-dried samples over a year should be assessed.
  • Readouts with color and amplification: The colorimetric readouts need continued work, and possibly improved design, since we only managed to partially succeed with the assays. We however think that it is possible to realize this using more elegant ways of RNA detection.
  • Integration of all the modules of the platform: Although all our modules parts are functional, and locally integrated, we did not reach full integration into a unique object. However, we believe we only need more time to assemble a fully functional and integrated module system.