Difference between revisions of "Team:UCopenhagen/Protein-Import"
| Line 143: | Line 143: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p class="lead">The expression was verified using western blotting, and fluorescence of YFP and BFP both with and without CPP was verified with fluorescence microscopy.</p> | <p class="lead">The expression was verified using western blotting, and fluorescence of YFP and BFP both with and without CPP was verified with fluorescence microscopy.</p> | ||
| − | |||
<h4>Expression of fluorescent proteins</h4> | <h4>Expression of fluorescent proteins</h4> | ||
<p class="lead"> | <p class="lead"> | ||
In order to evaluate the import of the CPP tagged and non-tagged proteins, we first <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/88/Protein_extractions_and_purification.pdf">purified</a> the fluorescent proteins, then incubated <i>E.coli</i> cells with the purified proteins. Afterwards we removed the non-endocytosed fluorescent proteins by washing with water. (Fig 2) <br><br> | In order to evaluate the import of the CPP tagged and non-tagged proteins, we first <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/88/Protein_extractions_and_purification.pdf">purified</a> the fluorescent proteins, then incubated <i>E.coli</i> cells with the purified proteins. Afterwards we removed the non-endocytosed fluorescent proteins by washing with water. (Fig 2) <br><br> | ||
| − | Fluorescence microscopy was used to see if the fluorescent proteins had been imported into the cells. If the import system works with CPP tags, the fluorescent proteins should now be present in the cells treated with CPP-tagged fluorescent proteins, but not in the non-CPP tagged. | + | Fluorescence microscopy was used to see if the fluorescent proteins had been imported into the cells. If the import system works with CPP tags, the fluorescent proteins should now be present in the cells treated with CPP-tagged fluorescent proteins, but not in the non-CPP tagged. <br> |
<figure> | <figure> | ||
Revision as of 02:20, 2 November 2017
Introduction
The third mechanism that we have investigated in our project is protein import into bacterial cells, as a stand in for a symbiont. In the two best known endosymbiotic organelles, mitochondria and chloroplasts, a majority of gene expression has moved from the symbiont to the host. Because this relationship seems to be an evolutionary foundation of the known endosymbiotic relationships, we will attempt to imitate this concept.
Besides our interest in the evolutionary aspect of protein import, we believe it is valuable when approaching modular endosymbiosis. The principle of protein import would enable additional modularity in an endosymbiotic system, as one host can be manipulated to produce proteins to be utilized by a range of symbionts.
The majority of the proteins, destined for mitochondria, are expressed in the cytosol and subsequently imported across the membranes via transport complexes taking up unfolded peptides with an N-terminal signal sequence targeting them to the mitochondria (Schmidt et al 2010). Similar transport complexes are found in chloroplast. We want a similar targeted uptake, but in a simpler system. Thus, we utilise a small peptide shown to penetrate many types of cells; a Cell Penetrating Peptide (CPP) (Chang et al 2005, and Changet al 2014).
Final Design
Background: CPPs are small peptides, typically rich in arginines, which are able to facilitate transport of a wide variety of cargos across plasma membranes. Their origin in nature comes from viral domains such as the viral HIV tat domain (Eudes and Chugh, 2008). In recent years, research on creating synthetics CPPs has been conducted and especially peptides constructed solely from arginine residues have been of interest. The arginine rich sequence has been shown to trigger endocytosis in a wide range of cell types, including onion and potato cells. These experiments have shown that GFP connected to a CPP has entered the cells contained in vesicles (Chang et al 2005).
If CPP can be used as a protein tag for import into an endosymbiotic symbiont, the host proteins targeted to the symbiont would simply need the CPP added.
Goal: Evaluate the efficiency of protein uptake by our Escherichia coli chassis in presence and absence of the cell penetrating peptide (CPP).
Circuits and Biobricks: The parts in our circuit are fluorescent proteins and CPP.
We have chosen the yellow and blue fluorescent proteins (YFP and BFP) from the Biobrick repository, and improved them by adding the CPP sequence to the C-terminal end.
YFP: BBa_K2455002
BFP: BBa_K2455005
Additionally, we created a biobrick of CPP with a USER casette, ready for insertion of any protein to be imported: BBa_K2455003.
YFP and BFP were chosen to avoid overlapping colours with FM4-64, a red staining used for membranes, in case we wanted to look into the localization and potential vesicle breaking using confocal microscopy. As it turned out, we did not get far enough in the lab to do this.
Experiments
Overview
General verification
Vector creation
- Biobrick compatible (failed)
- Vector design
- CPP tag insertion
Evaluating protein import:
- Expression of fluorescent proteins
- Purification and import of the expressed proteins
Verifications and biobrick creation
In all three sub projects, we have used gel electrophoresis and sequencing to verify our stepwise experiments. Read more about our general verifications and biobrick creation under interdependency.
Vector creation
Our vector is a modified version of the pET102 vector, which contains a USER cassette, and a his tag after the USER cassette. The USER cassette is used for cloning genes into. We build the vector design on prSET102; an existing vector in our lab, containing the USER cassette and some restriction sites.
We have made two versions of the vector: one for expression of untagged YFP and BFP, that was also used in the interdependency subproject. The other has a CPP tag before the USER cassette, which will add CPP to the proteins.
Expression of fluorescent proteins
We inserted BFP and YFP with USER cloning, and transformed them into our expression strain BL21 using Mix&Go. BFP and YFP was expressed with the CPP tag from the CPP vector, and without from the vector without CPP. Together with CPP alone, this gave us a total of 5 protein constructs expressed.
- CPP-USER-his
- CPP-YFP-his
- CPP-BFP-his
- YFP-his
- BFP-his
The expression was verified using western blotting, and fluorescence of YFP and BFP both with and without CPP was verified with fluorescence microscopy.
Expression of fluorescent proteins
In order to evaluate the import of the CPP tagged and non-tagged proteins, we first purified the fluorescent proteins, then incubated E.coli cells with the purified proteins. Afterwards we removed the non-endocytosed fluorescent proteins by washing with water. (Fig 2)
Fluorescence microscopy was used to see if the fluorescent proteins had been imported into the cells. If the import system works with CPP tags, the fluorescent proteins should now be present in the cells treated with CPP-tagged fluorescent proteins, but not in the non-CPP tagged.
Design process/future
References
