Difference between revisions of "Team:LUBBOCK TTU/Results"
| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
<!-- END SECTION 2 --> | <!-- END SECTION 2 --> | ||
| − | <!-- SECTION | + | <!-- SECTION 3 --> |
<div style="background-color:#f7f7f7; overflow: auto;" class="clear_fix"> | <div style="background-color:#f7f7f7; overflow: auto;" class="clear_fix"> | ||
<center></br> | <center></br> | ||
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
<div class="col-sm-1"></div> | <div class="col-sm-1"></div> | ||
<div class="col-sm-10"></br> | <div class="col-sm-10"></br> | ||
| − | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2c/Lubbock_TTU_results_2.png" height="" width=""></br><font size="2">Fig. 2. Experimental setup. This image shows how [Ca2+] has varied among wells</br>of the plate. This concentration setup was consistent among all 3 plates.</font></center></br></br></div> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Using the 96 well plates, with Ca2+concentration gradients as shown above, we will incubate in a range of temperatures and measure the fluorescence output | Using the 96 well plates, with Ca2+concentration gradients as shown above, we will incubate in a range of temperatures and measure the fluorescence output | ||
</br>· Given this data, we can investigate a more focused range of calcium concentration | </br>· Given this data, we can investigate a more focused range of calcium concentration | ||
| + | </div> | ||
<div class="col-sm-1"></div> | <div class="col-sm-1"></div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | <!-- END SECTION | + | <!-- END SECTION 3 --> |
<!-- SECTION 5 --> | <!-- SECTION 5 --> | ||
Revision as of 03:46, 2 November 2017
Overview
· Ligated fragments coding for sfGFP and mNeonGreen into YEp352 vectors
· Roughly confirmed presence of fragment through agarose gel
· Performed transformation of S. cerevisiae BY4741 with plasmids roughly confirmed to contain our biobricks
· Digested YEp352 vectors were ligated with either our sfGFP biobrick or our mNeon Green biobrick after PCR cleanup to remove one of the enzymes that was not heat killed
· Samples of sfGFP ligated vectors were ran in parallel to mNeon Green ligated vectors
· The ligation product was transformed into E. Coli for cloning
· Cells were mini-prepped to extract our plasmid
· To confirm the extracted sample consisted on plasmid containing our fragment of interest, a gel was run
· To prepare for the gel check, a portion of the mini-prep product was digested
· The enzyme should cleave the plasmid on either side of the previously ligated fragment, resulting in two pieces of DNA, the cut vector (approx. 5kb) and the naked fragment (approx. 2 kb)
· Figure 2 shows a clear line at 5kb and faint bands at 2kb, indicating that the fragments should be contained with mini-prepped plasmid
Fig. 1. 1kb DNA ladderfrom NEB
Fig. 2. Agarose gel confirming presence of fragment within vectors. 
Fig. 2. Experimental setup. This image shows how [Ca2+] has varied among wellsof the plate. This concentration setup was consistent among all 3 plates.
· We used common wet lab procedures requiring common wet lab equipment.
· All protocols are listed under the Experiment tab and provide clear instructions for those interested in replicating our work.
