Difference between revisions of "Team:Tec-Chihuahua/Demonstrate"

Line 16: Line 16:
 
<center><div class="row">
 
<center><div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-12">
 
<div class="col-md-12">
<sub><b>Figure 1. </b>(A) SnapGene® map of BBa_K2471000. (B) Agarose gel (1%) electrophoresis of BBa_K2471000 compared with NEB Quick-Load® Purple 2-Log DNA Ladder (0.1 - 10.0 kb), where the highlighted bands correspond to approximately 3,000 base pairs.</sub>
+
<sub><b>Figure 1. </b>Day zero</sub>
 
</div></center><br><br>
 
</div></center><br><br>
  
Line 22: Line 22:
 
<center><div class="row">
 
<center><div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-12">
 
<div class="col-md-12">
<sub><b>Figure 1. </b>(A) SnapGene® map of BBa_K2471000. (B) Agarose gel (1%) electrophoresis of BBa_K2471000 compared with NEB Quick-Load® Purple 2-Log DNA Ladder (0.1 - 10.0 kb), where the highlighted bands correspond to approximately 3,000 base pairs.</sub>
+
<sub><b>Figure 2. </b>zero</sub>
 
</div></center><br><br>
 
</div></center><br><br>
  
Line 28: Line 28:
 
<center><div class="row">
 
<center><div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-12">
 
<div class="col-md-12">
<sub><b>Figure 1. </b>(A) SnapGene® map of BBa_K2471000. (B) Agarose gel (1%) electrophoresis of BBa_K2471000 compared with NEB Quick-Load® Purple 2-Log DNA Ladder (0.1 - 10.0 kb), where the highlighted bands correspond to approximately 3,000 base pairs.</sub>
+
<sub><b>Figure 3. </b>blah</sub>
 
</div></center><br><br>
 
</div></center><br><br>
  
Line 34: Line 34:
 
<center><div class="row">
 
<center><div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-12">
 
<div class="col-md-12">
<sub><b>Figure 1. </b>(A) SnapGene® map of BBa_K2471000. (B) Agarose gel (1%) electrophoresis of BBa_K2471000 compared with NEB Quick-Load® Purple 2-Log DNA Ladder (0.1 - 10.0 kb), where the highlighted bands correspond to approximately 3,000 base pairs.</sub>
+
<sub><b>Figure 4. </b>blah</sub>
 
</div></center><br><br>
 
</div></center><br><br>
  

Revision as of 21:46, 31 October 2017

Erwinions

Demonstrate

Stem inoculation cell

E. amylovora was inoculated into apple stems with different genes that encode to aiiA and yhjH proteins. In such cases, disease was visible three days after inoculation and was developed to similar levels gradually until it reached the 8th day and the disease considerably increased its expansion through the leaf. However, differences in disease development both the severity of disease and the time of disease onset) were seen both between the Erwinia amylovora wild ones and Erwinia amylovora aiiA. Bacterial inocula were prepared by growing an overnight culture of E.amylovora electroporated with aiiA in LB broth enriched with sucrose at 28°C in a shaking incubator.


Figure 1. Day zero


Figure 2. zero


Figure 3. blah


Figure 4. blah


References

oa