Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="entitle"> | <div class="entitle"> | ||
− | + | Ethics | |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="descriptioned"> | <div class="descriptioned"> | ||
− | + | GeneHackers also hosted an event with incoming first years at the University. Members of the iGEM team led a conversation surrounding the ethics of genetic engineering. The participants debated the potential advantages and disadvantages of embryonic screening, genetically modified foods, etc. Our discussion encouraged critical thinking and intellectual investment in the world of biotechnology. At the end of the program, we repeated our strawberry DNA extraction activity, which received lots of positive feedback in March. By the end of the night, several of the students expressed interest in joining GeneHackers in the autumn! | |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 06:01, 18 October 2017
★ ALERT!
This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the medal criterion or award listed above.
Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at Instructions for Pages for awards.
Education and Public Engagement
Best Education and Public Engagement Special Prize
Over the last few years, we have seen teams produce some truly outstanding work in the areas of education and public engagement. Innovative educational tools and public engagement activities have the ability to discuss the science behind synthetic biology, spark new scientific curiosity and establish a public dialogue about synthetic biology from voices/views outside the lab.
To compete for the Best Education and Public Engagement prize, please describe your work on this page and also fill out the description on the judging form.
You must also delete the message box on the top of this page to be eligible for this prize.
Inspiration
Here are a few examples of excellent Education and Public Engagement work: