Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<h2> Cloning of this NPA-RS in pSB1C3 and pSB3T5</h2> | <h2> Cloning of this NPA-RS in pSB1C3 and pSB3T5</h2> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | We used the amino acid sequence of the clone with the highest fidelity for 2-NPA and reverse translated it into a gene sequence, which was then codon optimized for <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Matching overhangs of | + | We used the amino acid sequence of the clone with the highest fidelity for 2-NPA and reverse translated it into a gene sequence, which was then codon optimized for <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Matching overhangs of 35 bp to a linearized o-(2-nitrobenzyl)-L-tyrosine-Part (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1416000">BBa_K1416000</a>) were designed for it contains a matching promoter and terminator for the synthetase and also the tRNA needed for the incorporation. The pSB1C3 backbone is a high copy plasmid. For an adequate usage of the aaRS, it is needed on a low copy plasmid to reduce the stress caused by producing a high amount of the synthetases and the tRNA. BioBrick assembly was performed to insert the new 2-NPA-Part (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2201200">BBa_K2201200</a>) into the low copy plasmid pSB3T5 (Figure 2) for further use. BBa_K2201200 in the low copy plasmid pSB3T5 is available on request. |
</article> | </article> | ||
<div class="figure medium"> | <div class="figure medium"> | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
<h2> Proof of incorporation of AS at Amber-codon when cotransformed with NPA-RS </h2> | <h2> Proof of incorporation of AS at Amber-codon when cotransformed with NPA-RS </h2> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | To proof the expression of the 2-NPA-RS in BBa_K2201200 we transformed this part, the ONBY-Part (BBa_K1416000) and a plasmid only containing the coding sequence of the fusion protein in E. coli BL21(DE3). The three transformants were cultivated in LB-media for 16 hours at 37°C and 150 rpm. The cultures were harvested and the pellets lysed after the standard protocol of cell lysis in lysis buffer. Afterwards 15 | + | To proof the expression of the 2-NPA-RS in BBa_K2201200 we transformed this part, the ONBY-Part (BBa_K1416000) and a plasmid only containing the coding sequence of the fusion protein in E. coli BL21(DE3). The three transformants were cultivated in LB-media for 16 hours at 37°C and 150 rpm. The cultures were harvested and the pellets lysed after the standard protocol of cell lysis in lysis buffer. Afterwards 15 µL of the samples were transferred to an SDS-Page (Figure 4). Two bands were present at approximately 35 kDA at the 2-NPA and the ONBY sample which correlates with the expected masses of the synthetases. |
</article> | </article> | ||
<div class="figure small"> | <div class="figure small"> | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | To proof the functionality of the 2-NPA-RS the part was cotransformed with plasmid II (containing BBa_K2201321) in E. coli BL21(DE3) along with plasmid I (BBa_K2201320) and plasmid II was also transformed separately. After cultivation and cell lysis as mentioned above (in which one culture of the cotransformants was cultivated with 1 mM of 2-NPA and another with 0 mM 2-NPA) the samples were transferred on an SDS-Page and a western-blot with anti-GFP-antibodies was performed (Figure 5). | + | To proof the functionality of the 2-NPA-RS the part was cotransformed with plasmid II (containing BBa_K2201321) in <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) along with plasmid I (BBa_K2201320) and plasmid II was also transformed separately. After cultivation and cell lysis as mentioned above (in which one culture of the cotransformants was cultivated with 1 mM of 2-NPA and another with 0 mM 2-NPA) the samples were transferred on an SDS-Page and a western-blot with anti-GFP-antibodies was performed (Figure 5). |
</article> | </article> | ||
<div class="figure small"> | <div class="figure small"> | ||
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
<h2>Cleavage of the fusion protein</h2> | <h2>Cleavage of the fusion protein</h2> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | To prove that photolysis of 2-NPA is also possible when incorporated into a protein, three transformants of <i>E.coli</i> BL21(DE3) were cultivated. The first one contains the part BBa_K2201320 which expresses the whole fusion protein of GFP and streptavidin. The second one contains the part BBa_K2201321 and produces the GFP-unit of the fusion protein due to the amber stop codon in the linker. The third one is a cotransformant of BBa_K2201220 (2-NPA-RS) and BBa_K2201321 and therefore should produce the whole fusion protein with 2-NPA in the linker. The cells were cultivated in 50 mL LB-media (for the cotransformants supplemented with 1 mM 2-NPA) in 500 mL shaking flask for 16 hours at 37 °C and 150 rpm. The cells were harvested and lysed after the cell lyses protocol for SDS-Page. Two Samples of the cell lysate of the cotransformants were transferred to a 96-well microtiter plate and irradiated with the LED panel at 367 nm and 100 % brightness . After irradiation the samples were transferred to a SDS-Page (Figure 9). | + | To prove that photolysis of 2-NPA is also possible when incorporated into a protein, three transformants of <i>E.coli</i> BL21(DE3) were cultivated. The first one contains the part BBa_K2201320 which expresses the whole fusion protein of GFP and streptavidin. The second one contains the part BBa_K2201321 and produces the GFP-unit of the fusion protein due to the amber stop codon in the linker. The third one is a cotransformant of BBa_K2201220 (2-NPA-RS) and BBa_K2201321 and therefore should produce the whole fusion protein with 2-NPA in the linker. The cells were cultivated in 50 mL LB-media (for the cotransformants supplemented with 1 mM 2-NPA) in 500 mL shaking flask for 16 hours at 37 °C and 150 rpm. The cells were harvested and lysed after the cell lyses protocol for SDS-Page. Two Samples of the cell lysate of the cotransformants were transferred to a 96-well microtiter plate and irradiated with the LED panel at 367 nm and 100 % brightness. After irradiation the samples were transferred to a SDS-Page (Figure 9). |
</article> | </article> | ||
<div class="figure medium"> | <div class="figure medium"> | ||
Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | Figure 9 shows the bands of the whole fusion protein at approximately | + | Figure 9 shows the bands of the whole fusion protein at approximately 40.9 kDa for the positive control 1 and the two samples. Furthermore, the bands of the GFP-units can be seen at approximately 27 kDa and the bands of the 2-NPA-RS at ~ 35 kDa. At the bottom of the SDS-page the bands of the cleaved streptavidin-tags of the two samples can be observed. Unfortunately, there was an uneven running front which led to a shift of the samples compared to the marker. Therefore, a western blot was performed (Figure 10) with specific anti-GFP and anti-strep antibodies to verify that the bands seen in Figure 9 are truly the peptides we expected. |
</article> | </article> | ||
<div class="figure medium"> | <div class="figure medium"> | ||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | The western blot confirmed our expectations. The bands of the whole fusion protein, of the GFP-units and the cleaved streptavidin-tags are clear to see. The GFP-bands are very thick compared to the others, which cannot be explained by the photolysis itself. It seems like the 2-NPA-RS is not very effective in loading 2-NPA to the amber tRNA, which leads to a high amount of incomplete expression of the fusion protein. The low efficiency of our 2-NPA-RS was confirmed by our synthetase-test system (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2201343">BBa_K2201343</a>). Therefore, we started modeling and selection of a new aaRS, able to incorporate 2-NPA to provide a better synthetase to the iGEM community. | + | The western blot confirmed our expectations. The bands of the whole fusion protein, of the GFP-units and the cleaved streptavidin-tags are clear to see. The GFP-bands are very thick compared to the others, which cannot be explained by the photolysis itself. It seems like the 2-NPA-RS is not very effective in loading 2-NPA to the amber tRNA, which leads to a high amount of incomplete expression of the fusion protein. The low efficiency of our 2-NPA-RS was confirmed (Figure 11) by our synthetase-test system (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2201343">BBa_K2201343</a>). Therefore, we started modeling and selection of a new aaRS, able to incorporate 2-NPA to provide a better synthetase to the iGEM community. |
</article> | </article> | ||
+ | <div class="figure medium"> | ||
+ | <img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/f/ff/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--YKE_2_NPA_Ranks.png"> | ||
+ | <p class="figure subtitle"><b>Figure 11:</b> Scores resulting from the synthetase-test system. The negative rank results from the emission quotient CFP(475 nm)/YFP(525 nm) when cultivated without the specific ncAA. The positive rank results from the emission quotient YFP(525 nm)/CFP(475 nm) when cultivated with the specific ncAA. The mean rank allows the combination of the negative and the positive rank to compare the efficiency of synthetases among each other.<p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="bevel bl"></div> | <div class="bevel bl"></div> |
Revision as of 18:57, 28 October 2017
Short summary
Design of the 2-nitrophenylalanine-tRNA synthetase
Figure 1: Alignment of the amino acids sequences with ClustalOmega of the M. jannaschii tyrosyl synthetase and the 2-nitrophenylalanine synthetase designed by Peters et al.
Cloning of this NPA-RS in pSB1C3 and pSB3T5
Figure 2: Two Plasmids we created for our toolkit for the iGEM community. Left: 2-NPA-RS in the pSB1C3 high copy plasmid (K2201200). Right: 2-NPA-RS in the pSB3T5 low copy plasmid (available on request) at the CeBiTec.
Design of the fusion protein
(1) Only the GFP-unit will be expressed (B).
(2) If cotransformed with an aaRS for a non-canonical amino acid but without feeding the specific ncAA. The aaRS will incorporate other amino acids profoundly phenylalanine in the linker (C).
(3) If cotransformed and with the 2-NPA in the culture media, the fusion protein will be expressed with 2-NPA in the linker (D). The fusion protein can then be irradiated by light of a wavelength of < 367nm.
(4) This induces the cleavage of the fusion protein to its GFP-unit (E) and the streptavidin-unit (F).
Figure 3: Design of two plasmids for fusion proteins. I) Plasmid (K2201320) for reference protein of GFP (green) a linker (purple) and streptavidin (yellow) (A). II) Plasmid (K2201321) for the application protein with Amber-codon (black star) in the linker for three different protein variants after expression. 1: Solely expression leads to GFP-unit and linker to the Amber-codon (B). 2: Cotransformed with a 2-NPA-RS (K2201200) without 2-NPA leads to a fusion protein with an unspecific amino acid (presumably phenylalanine, red star) in the linker (C). 3: Cotransformed with 2-NPA-RS and 2-NPA leads to the functional fusion protein with 2-NPA (purple star) in the linker (D). 4: Irradiation of protein D leads to a cleavage of the fusion protein in the GFP-unit (E) and the streptavidin unit (F).
Proof of incorporation of AS at Amber-codon when cotransformed with NPA-RS
Figure 4: SDS-Page of the expressed 2-NPA-RS (left) from K2201200 with ONBY-RS from K1416000 as positive control (middle) and the basic protein expression of BL21(DE3) as negative control (right).
Figure 5: Western blot with GFP-antibodies of the four different fusion proteins variants (figure 3) as proof of the functionality of the 2-NPA-RS. The band marked with a * is weak because of degradation of the fusion protein while the storage. The bands at approximately 45,0 kDa mark the mass of the whole fusion protein (~ 40,9 kDa), the bands at approximately 25,0 kDa mark the GFP-unit (~ 27,0 kDa) of the fusion protein.
Permeability of Microwellplate by irradiation of 365nm
Figure 6: Three microwell plates tested for their suitability for the irradiation with the LED-panel. Left: Black nunc plate. Middle: Transparent nunc plate. Right: Transparent greiner plate.
Figure 7: Results of the irradiation test of the three microwell plates: Left: Extinction of the plates for light of the wavelengths from 300 to 450 nm. Right: Calculated light-permeability in % of the three tested plates. At 365 nm wavelength 87% of the light permits the black nunc plate, 80 % permits the transparent nunc plate and 76 % permits the transparent greiner plate.
Change of structure of 2-nitrophenylalanine due to UV-light
Figure 8: Changes in the absorption spectrum of 2-NPA in LB media while irradiated at 367 nm for 240 minutes. The emerging peak at ~ 340 nm indicates the change in the structure of 2-NPA from its native form, to the self-cyclized form.
Cleavage of the fusion protein
Figure 9: SDS-Page of the whole fusion protein as positive control 1, GFP-unit as positive control 2, and two samples of the irradiated fusion protein containing 2-NPA after 1 hour and 5 hours of irradiation with UV-light. In dark green are the bands of the whole fusion protein. In purple the bands of the 2-NPA-RS In light green the GFP-unit of the fusion protein and in yellow the bands of the cleaved streptavidin-Tag.
Figure 10: Western Blot of a SDS-Page similar to Figure 9 marked with anti-GFP antibodies to determine the bands marked in Figure 9. It proves that the low bands in Figure 9 are indeed cleaved streptavidin-Tags.
Figure 11: Scores resulting from the synthetase-test system. The negative rank results from the emission quotient CFP(475 nm)/YFP(525 nm) when cultivated without the specific ncAA. The positive rank results from the emission quotient YFP(525 nm)/CFP(475 nm) when cultivated with the specific ncAA. The mean rank allows the combination of the negative and the positive rank to compare the efficiency of synthetases among each other.