Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
<p>The ComS optimal concentration in the medium seems to be at 4 µM. Multiple experiences shows that higher concentrations even reduces the signal.</p> | <p>The ComS optimal concentration in the medium seems to be at 4 µM. Multiple experiences shows that higher concentrations even reduces the signal.</p> | ||
+ | <figure> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c4/UCLOUVAIN_Ap2_result_graph2.jpeg" class="in_text_img" style="width: 500px;"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c4/UCLOUVAIN_Ap2_result_graph2.jpeg" class="in_text_img" style="width: 500px;"> | ||
+ | <figcaption> <center> <font size = "2"><i>Fig.2: Graphic showing para-nitrophenol ’s absorbance at 405 nm after 1 hour incubation with different ComS (’s) concentrationS.</i></font>.</figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | <figure> | ||
<p>Still in order to obtain a practical product, the signal has to be clearly visible and easy to interpret. | <p>Still in order to obtain a practical product, the signal has to be clearly visible and easy to interpret. |
Revision as of 20:00, 31 October 2017
In order to make a UV sensitive ComR/S system three plasmids were given to us.
Plasmid | Promoter | Reporter | Resistance |
---|---|---|---|
pcMMCD 102 | / | Glucoronidase | Erythromycin |
pcMMCD 105 | P1655 | ||
pcMMCD 106 | Pshp0064 |
The promoters chosen are two proteins’ promoters induced by ComR in Streptococcus thermophilius. P1655 is a strong promoter heavily induced by ComR. On the contrary, Pshp0064 is a much weaker promoter.
The plasmids were contained inside an E. coli DH5-alpha strain that were GusA+. This meant glucoronidase's expression even when not induced. To prevent this, we extracted the plasmids and inserted them in E. coli DH5-alpha GusA- strain.
This allowed us to quantify glucuronidase activity in ComS’s presence with para-nitrophenol glucuronide (protocol described in notebook). We took the optical density at 405 nm wavelength after induction. This is the absorption wavelength of para-nitrophenol. The pcMMCD 102 and pcMMCD 106 gave no signal except background noise. Only pcMMCD 105 gave a significant signal.
ComS (µM) | pcMMCD 102 | pcMMCD 105 | pcMMCD 106 |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.078 | 0.495 | 0.077 |
8 | 0.096 | 1.514 | 0.082 |
To obtain a good UV detector we need the expression to be closely linked in time with the ComS presence.
We assessed this with the same test with pcMMCD 105 but this time with different incubation times. As you can see on fig.1, the signal is already visible after 20 minutes and becomes steady after 80 minutes.