Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<h2> Cloning of the NPA-RS in pSB1C3 and pSB3T5</h2> | <h2> Cloning of the NPA-RS in pSB1C3 and pSB3T5</h2> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | We used the amino acid sequence of the clone with the highest fidelity for 2-NPA and reverse translated it into a gene sequence, which was then codon optimized for <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Matching overhangs of 35 bp to a linearized o-(2-nitrobenzyl)-L-tyrosine-Part (<a target="_blank" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1416000">BBa_K1416000</a>) were designed | + | We used the amino acid sequence of the clone with the highest fidelity for 2-NPA and reverse translated it into a gene sequence, which was then codon optimized for <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Matching overhangs of 35 bp to a linearized o-(2-nitrobenzyl)-L-tyrosine-Part (<a target="_blank" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1416000">BBa_K1416000</a>) were designed, so that it contains a matching promoter and terminator for the synthetase and also the tRNA needed for the incorporation. The pSB1C3 backbone is a high copy plasmid. For an adequate usage of the aaRS, it is needed on a low copy plasmid to reduce the stress caused by producing a high amount of the synthetases and the tRNA. BioBrick assembly was performed to insert the new 2-NPA-Part (<a target="_blank" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2201200">BBa_K2201200</a>) into the low copy plasmid pSB3T5 (Figure 2) for further use. <a target="_blank" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2201200">BBa_K2201200</a> in the low copy plasmid pSB3T5 is available on request. |
</article> | </article> | ||
<div class="figure medium"> | <div class="figure medium"> | ||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
<div class="figure medium"> | <div class="figure medium"> | ||
<img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/27/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--YKE_westernblot_results1.png"> | <img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/27/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--YKE_westernblot_results1.png"> | ||
− | <p class="figure subtitle"><b>Figure 5: Western blot with GFP-antibodies of the four different fusion proteins variants (figure 3) as proof of the functionality of the 2-NPA-RS.</b> The band marked with | + | <p class="figure subtitle"><b>Figure 5: Western blot with GFP-antibodies of the four different fusion proteins variants (figure 3) as proof of the functionality of the 2-NPA-RS.</b> The band marked with * is weak because of degradation of the fusion protein while the storage. The bands at approximately 45,0 kDa mark the mass of the whole fusion protein (~ 40,9 kDa), the bands at approximately 25,0 kDa mark the GFP-unit (~ 27,0 kDa) of the fusion protein.<p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
<h2> Change of Structure of 2-Nitrophenylalanine due to UV-Light</h2> | <h2> Change of Structure of 2-Nitrophenylalanine due to UV-Light</h2> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | To test if the structure of 2-NPA can be changed by irradiation with our <a target="_blank" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Hardware">LED panel</a>, an <i>in vitro</i> test was conducted. LB media supplemented with 1 mM 2-NPA was used for absorption measurements over 4 hours while | + | To test if the structure of 2-NPA can be changed by irradiation with our <a target="_blank" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Hardware">LED panel</a>, an <i>in vitro</i> test was conducted. LB media supplemented with 1 mM 2-NPA was used for absorption measurements over 4 hours while irradiated with UV-light in a 96-well microtiter plate. A high absorption in the UV spectrum (< 300 nm) was observed, which makes sense since 2-NPA absorbs the UV-light to do the self-cyclization reaction (Figure 8). Over time a constant increase in the absorption spectrum at approximately 340 nm could be noticed, which indicates the emergence of a chemical component due to the irradiation process. We are confident that this compound is the 2-NPA in its cinnoline form, as proposed by Peters <i>et al.</i>, which leads to a shift in the absorption spectrum. |
</article> | </article> | ||
<div class="figure medium"> | <div class="figure medium"> | ||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
<div class="figure medium"> | <div class="figure medium"> | ||
<img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/ad/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--YKE_SDS_PAGE_photolysis.png"> | <img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/ad/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--YKE_SDS_PAGE_photolysis.png"> | ||
− | <p class="figure subtitle"><b>Figure 9: SDS-Page of four different samples.</b> The whole fusion protein as positive control 1, GFP-unit as positive control 2, and two samples of the irradiated fusion protein containing 2-NPA after 1 hour and 5 hours of irradiation with UV-light. In dark green are the bands of the whole fusion protein. In purple the bands of the 2-NPA-RS In light green the GFP-unit of the fusion protein and in yellow the bands of the cleaved streptavidin-Tag.<p> | + | <p class="figure subtitle"><b>Figure 9: SDS-Page of four different samples.</b> The whole fusion protein as positive control 1, GFP-unit as positive control 2, and two samples of the irradiated fusion protein containing 2-NPA after 1 hour and 5 hours of irradiation with UV-light. In dark green are the bands of the whole fusion protein. In purple the bands of the 2-NPA-RS. In light green the GFP-unit of the fusion protein and in yellow the bands of the cleaved streptavidin-Tag.<p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | Figure 9 shows the bands of the whole fusion protein at approximately 40.9 kDa for the positive control 1 and the two samples. Furthermore, the bands of the GFP-units can be seen at | + | Figure 9 shows the bands of the whole fusion protein at approximately 40.9 kDa for the positive control 1 and the two samples. Furthermore, the bands of the GFP-units can be seen at ~ 27 kDa and the bands of the 2-NPA-RS at ~ 35 kDa. At the bottom of the SDS-page the bands of the cleaved streptavidin-tags of the two samples can be observed. Unfortunately, there was an uneven running front which led to a shift of the samples compared to the marker. Therefore, a western blot was performed (Figure 10) with specific anti-GFP and anti-strep antibodies to verify that the bands seen in Figure 9 are truly the peptides we expected. |
</article> | </article> | ||
<div class="figure medium"> | <div class="figure medium"> | ||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | The western blot confirmed our expectations. The bands of the whole fusion protein, of the GFP-units and the cleaved streptavidin-tags are clear to see. The GFP-bands are very thick compared to the others, which cannot be explained by the photolysis itself. It seems like the 2-NPA-RS is not very effective in loading 2-NPA to the amber tRNA, which leads to a high amount of incomplete expression of the fusion protein. The low efficiency of our 2-NPA-RS was confirmed (Figure 11) by our synthetase-test system (<a target="_blank" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2201343">BBa_K2201343</a>). Therefore, we started modeling and | + | The western blot confirmed our expectations. The bands of the whole fusion protein, of the GFP-units and the cleaved streptavidin-tags are clear to see. The GFP-bands are very thick compared to the others, which cannot be explained by the photolysis itself. It seems like the 2-NPA-RS is not very effective in loading 2-NPA to the amber tRNA, which leads to a high amount of incomplete expression of the fusion protein. The low efficiency of our 2-NPA-RS was confirmed (Figure 11) by our synthetase-test system (<a target="_blank" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2201343">BBa_K2201343</a>). Therefore, we started modeling and selecting a new aaRS, able to incorporate 2-NPA to provide a better synthetase to the iGEM community. |
</article> | </article> | ||
<div class="figure medium"> | <div class="figure medium"> |
Revision as of 12:11, 1 November 2017
Short Summary
Design of the 2-Nitrophenylalanine-tRNA Synthetase
Figure 1: Alignment of the amino acids sequences with ClustalOmega of the M. jannaschii tyrosyl synthetase and the 2-nitrophenylalanine synthetase designed by Peters et al., 2009.They differ in ten amino acids, participating in the binding process of the amino acid.
Cloning of the NPA-RS in pSB1C3 and pSB3T5
Figure 2: Two Plasmids we created for our toolkit for the iGEM community. Left: 2-NPA-RS in the pSB1C3 high copy plasmid (BBa_K2201200). Right: 2-NPA-RS in the pSB3T5 low copy plasmid (available on request) at the CeBiTec.
Design of the Fusion Protein
(1) Only the GFP-unit will be expressed (B).
(2) If cotransformed with an aaRS for a non-canonical amino acid but without feeding the specific ncAA. The aaRS will incorporate other amino acids profoundly phenylalanine in the linker (C).
(3) If cotransformed and with the 2-NPA in the culture media, the fusion protein will be expressed with 2-NPA in the linker (D). The fusion protein can then be irradiated by light of a wavelength of < 367nm.
(4) This induces the cleavage of the fusion protein to its GFP-unit (E) and the streptavidin-unit (F).
Figure 3: Design of two plasmids for fusion proteins. I) Plasmid (BBa_K2201320) for reference protein of GFP (green) a linker (purple) and streptavidin (yellow) (A). II) Plasmid (BBa_K2201321) for the application protein with Amber-codon (black star) in the linker for three different protein variants after expression. 1: Solely expression leads to GFP-unit and linker to the Amber-codon (B). 2: Cotransformed with a 2-NPA-RS (BBa_K2201200) without 2-NPA leads to a fusion protein with an unspecific amino acid (presumably phenylalanine, red star) in the linker (C). 3: Cotransformed with 2-NPA-RS and 2-NPA leads to the functional fusion protein with 2-NPA (purple star) in the linker (D). 4: Irradiation of protein D leads to a cleavage of the fusion protein in the GFP-unit (E) and the streptavidin unit (F).
Proof of Incorporation of Amino Acids at the Amber-Codon when Cotransformed with the 2-NPA-RS
Figure 4: SDS-Page of the expressed 2-NPA-RS (left) from BBa_K2201200 with ONBY-RS from BBa_K1416000 as positive control (middle) and the basic protein expression of BL21(DE3) as negative control (right).
Figure 5: Western blot with GFP-antibodies of the four different fusion proteins variants (figure 3) as proof of the functionality of the 2-NPA-RS. The band marked with * is weak because of degradation of the fusion protein while the storage. The bands at approximately 45,0 kDa mark the mass of the whole fusion protein (~ 40,9 kDa), the bands at approximately 25,0 kDa mark the GFP-unit (~ 27,0 kDa) of the fusion protein.
Permeability of Microwellplate by Irradiation of 367nm
Figure 6: Three microwell plates tested for their suitability for the irradiation with the LED panel. Left: Black nunc plate. Middle: Transparent nunc plate. Right: Transparent greiner plate.
Figure 7:> Results of the irradiation test of the three microwell plate.
Change of Structure of 2-Nitrophenylalanine due to UV-Light
Figure 8: Changes in the absorption spectrum of 2-NPA in LB media while irradiated at 367 nm for 240 minutes. The emerging peak at ~ 340 nm indicates the change in the structure of 2-NPA from its native form, to the self-cyclized form.
Cleavage of the Fusion Protein
Figure 9: SDS-Page of four different samples. The whole fusion protein as positive control 1, GFP-unit as positive control 2, and two samples of the irradiated fusion protein containing 2-NPA after 1 hour and 5 hours of irradiation with UV-light. In dark green are the bands of the whole fusion protein. In purple the bands of the 2-NPA-RS. In light green the GFP-unit of the fusion protein and in yellow the bands of the cleaved streptavidin-Tag.
Figure 10: Western Blot of a SDS-Page similar to Figure 9. It was marked with anti-GFP antibodies to determine the bands of the SDS-Page. It proves that the low bands in Figure 9 are indeed cleaved streptavidin-Tags.
Figure 11: Scores resulting from the synthetase-test system. The negative rank results from the emission quotient CFP(475 nm)/YFP(525 nm) when cultivated without the specific ncAA. The positive rank results from the emission quotient YFP(525 nm)/CFP(475 nm) when cultivated with the specific ncAA. The mean rank allows the combination of the negative and the positive rank to compare the efficiency of synthetases among each other.