Difference between revisions of "Team:MSU-Michigan/HP/Silver"

 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
 
+
<div class="w3-cell-row">
 
+
  <div class="w3-col w3-container" style="width:17.5%"></div>
<div class="column full_size">
+
  <div class="w3-col w3-container w3-pale-green" style="width:60%">
 
+
 
<h1>Silver Medal Human Practices</h1>
 
<h1>Silver Medal Human Practices</h1>
<p>iGEM teams are leading in the area of Human Practices because they conduct their projects within a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.</p>
 
<p>Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest. </p>
 
<p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Competition/Human_Practices">Human Practices page</a>.</p>
 
</div>
 
 
<div class="clear"></div>
 
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h3>Silver Medal Criterion #3</h3>
 
<p>Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is safe, responsible and good for the world. You could accomplish this through engaging with your local, national and/or international communities or other approaches. Please note that standard surveys will not fulfill this criteria.</p>
 
</div>
 
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>Some Human Practices topic areas </h5>
 
<ul>
 
<li>Philosophy</li>
 
<li>Public Engagement / Dialogue</li>
 
<li>Education</li>
 
<li>Product Design</li>
 
<li>Scale-Up and Deployment Issues</li>
 
<li>Environmental Impact</li>
 
<li>Ethics</li>
 
<li>Safety</li>
 
<li>Security</li>
 
<li>Public Policy</li>
 
<li>Law and Regulation</li>
 
<li>Risk Assessment</li>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
 
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>What should we write about on this page?</h5>
 
<p>On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement). This should include all of the work done for the Silver Medal Criterion #3. Details for your Gold medal work and/or work for the two Human Practices special prizes should be put on those specified pages.</p>
 
</div>
 
 
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>Inspiration</h5>
 
<p>Read what other teams have done:</p>
 
<ul>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Dundee/policypractice/experts">2014 Dundee </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/Policy_Practices_Overview">2014 UC Davis </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Manchester/HumanPractices">2013 Manchester </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Cornell/outreach">2013 Cornell </a></li>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="w3-cell-row">
 
  <div class="w3-col w3-container" style="width:25%"></div>
 
  <div class="w3-col w3-container" style="width:50%">
 
  
 
<h2>Overview of Outreach</h2>
 
<h2>Overview of Outreach</h2>
Line 92: Line 27:
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
<h3>Women In Engineering</h3>
 
  
 +
<h3>Michigan Science Center</h3>
 +
<p>
 +
We presented at the Michigan Science Center in Detroit Michigan.  We spoke about our project to people from different backgrounds and informed them about the impacts of our project.  The attendees asked many questions about our project and its safety, so we made sure to take their concerns into account.  We had a a few memorable discussions about the risks of our genetically engineered Shewanella escaping into the environment and how one would have to deal with that.  Thankfully our bacteria is non-pathogenic and the modifications we made would not be harmful, except possibly the addition of spectinomycin resistance.  Despite the safety of our organism we also made sure that our bioreactors would be safe in an environment and would be nearly fool proof.  With the reactor being almost entirely sealed, except the injection port which is usually sealed, they are safe in the environment.  After discussing our project for a while with the attendees we sat down and had small round table forum style discussions on many topics ranging from wiping out mosquitoes to using genetically engineered bacteria to produce spider silk.  The discussions were informative and heartfelt from some of the attendees.  We ended up leaving the Center with a much better understanding of the public's view and the public left with a better understanding of genetic engineering.
 +
</p>
  
<h3>Michigan Science Center</h3>
 
  
<h3>Midwest Meetup</h3>
+
<div class="w3-container center w3-padding-large">
 +
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:MSU-Michigan/Engagement" class="w3-button w3-xxlarge w3-padding-large w3-green w3-ripple w3-round w3-hover-white">More Engagement</a>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
{{MSU-Michigan-Footer}}
 
{{MSU-Michigan-Footer}}

Latest revision as of 00:09, 2 November 2017

Silver Medal Human Practices

Overview of Outreach

At the start of the team's work we spoke with a few members of the waste-water treatment world in order to determine if our project was going to be useful to the community and if it was going to be effective. We also spoke at a forum on synthetic biology and genetic engineering at the Michigan Science Center. This included a presentation on our project as well as round table discussions with locals on what they thought about synthetic biology and legal, ethical, and moral complications. After this we presented at a women in engineering excursion on our project and synthetic biology in general trying to focus on getting the students interested in synthetic biology. We provided parts and instructions for them to make paper microbial fuel cells and demonstrated two working models. We also hosted the iGEM midwest meetup. This included presentations on our projects, board games, ice breaker activities, a nice lunch, a walk through the MSU gardens and an ice cream break.

The Waste-Water Treatment Plant

We visited the plant in hopes of leaving with a better idea on how to tackle the current issue of contaminated water supply. Bob, the manager of the plant, took us on a full tour displaying everything he could from where the water entered to where the solids and the clean water departed. Bob spoke told us about how water treatment is expensive and that the plant is barely getting by and using 40 year old equipment and machines. Late in the tour he told us some stories from when he visited some small villages in Nigeria where the people would drink water that was clearly contaminated as they had no choice and little knowledge of the contamination. This encouraged us to go ahead with making a cheap water contaminant detector.

Michigan Science Center

We presented at the Michigan Science Center in Detroit Michigan. We spoke about our project to people from different backgrounds and informed them about the impacts of our project. The attendees asked many questions about our project and its safety, so we made sure to take their concerns into account. We had a a few memorable discussions about the risks of our genetically engineered Shewanella escaping into the environment and how one would have to deal with that. Thankfully our bacteria is non-pathogenic and the modifications we made would not be harmful, except possibly the addition of spectinomycin resistance. Despite the safety of our organism we also made sure that our bioreactors would be safe in an environment and would be nearly fool proof. With the reactor being almost entirely sealed, except the injection port which is usually sealed, they are safe in the environment. After discussing our project for a while with the attendees we sat down and had small round table forum style discussions on many topics ranging from wiping out mosquitoes to using genetically engineered bacteria to produce spider silk. The discussions were informative and heartfelt from some of the attendees. We ended up leaving the Center with a much better understanding of the public's view and the public left with a better understanding of genetic engineering.

Sponsors
 Logo  Logo  Logo  Logo  Logo  Logo  Logo width=  Logo  Logo width=  Logo width=

Contact us: