Dbergen195 (Talk | contribs) |
Dbergen195 (Talk | contribs) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Fusing proteins is normally limited to the C‑ or N‑terminus of a protein. | Fusing proteins is normally limited to the C‑ or N‑terminus of a protein. | ||
The incorporation of non-canonical amino acids that could be fused to each | The incorporation of non-canonical amino acids that could be fused to each | ||
− | other or to surfaces enables several additional applications. | + | other or to surfaces enables several additional applications. Examples are the |
− | immobilization of proteins | + | immobilization of proteins as well as improved stability of protein polymer networks. |
− | Furthermore, | + | Furthermore, it leads to enhanced efficiency of pathways by combining enzymes of |
one pathway or for any other system where colocalization is beneficial. | one pathway or for any other system where colocalization is beneficial. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | As proof of concept, we work on enhanced stability of a protein polymer. | + | As proof of concept, we work on enhanced stability of a protein polymer. These networks |
can be applied for different applications like modern biomaterials in medicine and industry | can be applied for different applications like modern biomaterials in medicine and industry | ||
− | (Rnjak-Kovacina <i>et al.</i>, 2011). The amino acids N<sup>ε</sup>‑L‑cysteinyl‑L‑lysine (CL) | + | (Rnjak-Kovacina <i>et al.</i>, 2011). The amino acids <i>N</i><sup>ε</sup>‑L‑cysteinyl‑L‑lysine (CL) |
− | and N<sup>γ</sup>‑2‑cyanobenzothiazol‑6‑yl‑L‑asparagine (CBT‑asparagine) | + | and <i>N</i><sup>γ</sup>‑2‑cyanobenzothiazol‑6‑yl‑L‑asparagine (CBT‑asparagine) |
− | comprise key parts of this tool. Both amino acids can bind | + | comprise key parts of this tool. Both amino acids can bind specifically to each other resulting in the formation |
of a covalent bond between their side chains. We plan to use this covalent bond to increase the stability of | of a covalent bond between their side chains. We plan to use this covalent bond to increase the stability of | ||
silk elastin like proteins (SELPs). The strengthened polymer network would be a perfect material to produce | silk elastin like proteins (SELPs). The strengthened polymer network would be a perfect material to produce | ||
− | biological wound bindings which are very thin and | + | biological wound bindings which are very thin and would be able to interact with the natural tissue matrix |
(Boateng <i>et al.</i>, 2008). | (Boateng <i>et al.</i>, 2008). | ||
</article> | </article> | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
By synthesis of amino acids with side chains containing CBT and a 1,2‑aminothiol, polypeptides | By synthesis of amino acids with side chains containing CBT and a 1,2‑aminothiol, polypeptides | ||
− | binding to each other should be produced. These amino acids are CL and CBT‑asparagine | + | binding to each other should be produced. These amino acids are CL and CBT‑asparagine whose binding |
− | mechanism | + | mechanism is shown in figure 2. |
</article> | </article> | ||
<!-- Mittleres zentriertes Bild --> | <!-- Mittleres zentriertes Bild --> | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <h3>N<sup>ε</sup>-L-cysteinyl-L-lysine</h3> | + | <h3><i>N</i><sup>ε</sup>-L-cysteinyl-L-lysine</h3> |
<article> | <article> | ||
− | We synthesized CL | + | We synthesized CL and CBT‑asparagine in our lab. Additionally we are providing the community with a validated <a |
− | + | href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a6/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--protocol_CBT-asparagine.pdf">protocol for the synthesis of CBT‑asparagine</a>. | |
− | + | ||
</article> | </article> | ||
Line 94: | Line 93: | ||
chain of lysine so that CL contains a free 1,2-aminothiol group | chain of lysine so that CL contains a free 1,2-aminothiol group | ||
(Nguyen <i>et al.</i>, 2011). This is an important characteristic for the | (Nguyen <i>et al.</i>, 2011). This is an important characteristic for the | ||
− | specific binding between | + | specific binding between CL and CBT‑asparagine. |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li>Name: N<sup>ε</sup>-L-cysteinyl-L-lysine</li> | + | <li>Name: <i>N</i><sup>ε</sup>-L-cysteinyl-L-lysine</li> |
<li>Short: CL | <li>Short: CL | ||
<li>Molecular Weight: 249.33 g mol<sup>-1</sup></li> | <li>Molecular Weight: 249.33 g mol<sup>-1</sup></li> | ||
Line 114: | Line 113: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <h3>N<sup>γ</sup>-2-cyanobenzothiazol-6-yl-L-asparagine</h3> | + | <h3><i>N</i><sup>γ</sup>-2-cyanobenzothiazol-6-yl-L-asparagine</h3> |
<!-- Zwei Divs nebeneinander - Hier kann man Bilder oder articles einfuegen --> | <!-- Zwei Divs nebeneinander - Hier kann man Bilder oder articles einfuegen --> | ||
<div class="contentline"> | <div class="contentline"> | ||
Line 130: | Line 129: | ||
group of the side chain of L-asparagine. The cyano group of the CBT enables the specific binding of the CBT‑asparagine to 1,2-aminothiols. | group of the side chain of L-asparagine. The cyano group of the CBT enables the specific binding of the CBT‑asparagine to 1,2-aminothiols. | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li>Name: N<sup>γ</sup>‑2‑cyanobenzothiazol‑6‑yl‑L‑asparagine</li> | + | <li>Name: <i>N</i><sup>γ</sup>‑2‑cyanobenzothiazol‑6‑yl‑L‑asparagine</li> |
<li>Short: CBT‑asparagine | <li>Short: CBT‑asparagine | ||
<li>Molecular Weight: 290.30 g mol<sup>-1</sup></li> | <li>Molecular Weight: 290.30 g mol<sup>-1</sup></li> | ||
Line 153: | Line 152: | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
This specific binding can improve the stability of SELPs. These are linear polypeptides with repeats of silk and elastin consensus | This specific binding can improve the stability of SELPs. These are linear polypeptides with repeats of silk and elastin consensus | ||
− | sequences. They show | + | sequences. They show broad applications in medicine, tissue engineering and industry |
(Rnjak-Kovacina <i>et al.</i>, 2011). The silk consensus sequence is GAGAGS and the elastin consensus sequence is | (Rnjak-Kovacina <i>et al.</i>, 2011). The silk consensus sequence is GAGAGS and the elastin consensus sequence is | ||
VPAVG. The consensus sequences can interact with each other and are able to form non-covalent hydrogen bonds. This results in a | VPAVG. The consensus sequences can interact with each other and are able to form non-covalent hydrogen bonds. This results in a | ||
Line 161: | Line 160: | ||
<img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/36/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--27-08-17-Schematic_SELP.png"> | <img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/36/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--27-08-17-Schematic_SELP.png"> | ||
<p class="figure subtitle"> | <p class="figure subtitle"> | ||
− | <b>Figure 5: Schematic structure of a SELP polymer network.</b><br>Silk consensus sequences are shown in green, | + | <b>Figure 5: Schematic structure of a SELP polymer network.</b><br>Silk consensus sequences (GAGAGS) are shown in green, |
− | elastin consensus sequences | + | elastin consensus sequences (VPAVG) in red and the blue lines indicate the hydrogen bonds of the consensus sequences.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
Line 172: | Line 171: | ||
<img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b3/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--03-10-17-SELP_seq_Collins2013.png"> | <img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b3/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--03-10-17-SELP_seq_Collins2013.png"> | ||
<p class="figure subtitle"> | <p class="figure subtitle"> | ||
− | <b>Figure 6: Schematic sequence of the SELP (Collins <i>et al.</i>, 2013).</b><br>Silk consensus sequences | + | <b>Figure 6: Schematic sequence of the SELP (Collins <i>et al.</i>, 2013).</b><br>Silk consensus sequences (S) |
− | are green and elastin consensus sequences | + | are shown in green and elastin consensus sequences (E) in red.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | By | + | By incorporating CL and CBT‑asparagine between the silk and the elastin repeats, we receive a strengthened polymer network |
with covalent bonds (Figure 7). | with covalent bonds (Figure 7). | ||
</article> | </article> | ||
Line 184: | Line 183: | ||
<img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9e/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--27-08-17-SELP_ncAA.png"> | <img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9e/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--27-08-17-SELP_ncAA.png"> | ||
<p class="figure subtitle"> | <p class="figure subtitle"> | ||
− | <b>Figure 7: Schematic structure of a SELP polymer network.</b> | + | <b>Figure 7: Schematic structure of a SELP polymer network including CL and CBT-asparagine.</b><br>CL and CBT-asparagine (purple) are introduced between the silk (green) and elastin (red) repeats.</p> |
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<h3>Recursive Directional Ligation by Plasmid Reconstruction (PRe-RDL)</h3> | <h3>Recursive Directional Ligation by Plasmid Reconstruction (PRe-RDL)</h3> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
The gene sequence for these SELPs has a high GC content and contains a high number of repeats leading to issues during synthesis. | The gene sequence for these SELPs has a high GC content and contains a high number of repeats leading to issues during synthesis. | ||
− | Therefore, PRe-RDL can be applied to address this challenge. | + | Therefore, PRe-RDL can be applied to address this challenge. PRe-RDL uses three restriction sites of a parent plasmid which contains the |
− | gene of interest (goi) and the | + | gene of interest (goi) and the subsequent ligation of fragments of two different restricted parent plasmids. The first step involves |
the restriction of a parent plasmid at the 3'-end of the goi and in the backbone. The second step is the restriction of a parent plasmid | the restriction of a parent plasmid at the 3'-end of the goi and in the backbone. The second step is the restriction of a parent plasmid | ||
at the 5'-end of the goi and at the same position of the backbone as in the first step. The final step is the ligation of both generated | at the 5'-end of the goi and at the same position of the backbone as in the first step. The final step is the ligation of both generated | ||
Line 200: | Line 198: | ||
<p class="figure subtitle"> | <p class="figure subtitle"> | ||
<b>Figure 8: Scheme of the PRe-RDL according to McDaniel <i>et al.</i>, 2010 and applied to pSB1C3 containing one elastin consensus sequence.</b> The Pre-RDL | <b>Figure 8: Scheme of the PRe-RDL according to McDaniel <i>et al.</i>, 2010 and applied to pSB1C3 containing one elastin consensus sequence.</b> The Pre-RDL | ||
− | consists | + | consists of 3 steps, two different digestions (step 1 and 2) and one ligation (step 3).</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="article"> | <div class="article"> | ||
Line 207: | Line 205: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="figure large"> | <div class="figure large"> | ||
− | <img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f5/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--1-11-17_Design_elastin_silk.png"> |
<p class="figure subtitle"> | <p class="figure subtitle"> | ||
− | <b>Figure 9: Design of <a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2201250"> | + | <b>Figure 9: Design of <a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2201250">BBa_K2201250</a> and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2201251">BBa_K2201251</a>.</b> </p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="article"> | <div class="article"> | ||
Step 1 serves to create a fragment containing one part of the chloramphenicol resistance (CmR) and the whole monomer consensus sequence. To do so, the plasmid has to be digested | Step 1 serves to create a fragment containing one part of the chloramphenicol resistance (CmR) and the whole monomer consensus sequence. To do so, the plasmid has to be digested | ||
− | + | with <i>Acu</i>I and <i>Bsp</i>EI. The other fragments which are resulting from this step contain the other part of the CmR and each one part of the origin of replication (ori). | |
This decreases the chance of religation of the three fragments originating from this step. For step 2, it is necessary to use <i>Bse</i>RI and <i>Bsp</i>EI. The result of this | This decreases the chance of religation of the three fragments originating from this step. For step 2, it is necessary to use <i>Bse</i>RI and <i>Bsp</i>EI. The result of this | ||
digestion is one fragment containing one part of the CmR and the spacer between the prefix and the monomer consensus sequence and one fragment with the other part of the CmR, | digestion is one fragment containing one part of the CmR and the spacer between the prefix and the monomer consensus sequence and one fragment with the other part of the CmR, | ||
− | the ori, and the monomer consensus | + | the ori, and the monomer consensus sequence. By ligation of both fragments of step 1 and 2 containing the monomer consensus sequence (step 3) pSB1C3 with two repeats of the |
− | monomer consensus sequence. By repeating these steps it is possible to create repetitive sequences | + | monomer consensus sequence results. By repeating these steps it is possible to create repetitive sequences consisting of monomeric consensus sequences. During the PRe-RDL it is also possible |
− | to add codons like the amber codon using primers. After the PRe-RDL it is | + | to add codons like the amber codon using primers. After the PRe-RDL it is important to add a start and a stop codon. |
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:43, 2 November 2017
Short summary
As proof of concept, we work on enhanced stability of a protein polymer. These networks can be applied for different applications like modern biomaterials in medicine and industry (Rnjak-Kovacina et al., 2011). The amino acids Nε‑L‑cysteinyl‑L‑lysine (CL) and Nγ‑2‑cyanobenzothiazol‑6‑yl‑L‑asparagine (CBT‑asparagine) comprise key parts of this tool. Both amino acids can bind specifically to each other resulting in the formation of a covalent bond between their side chains. We plan to use this covalent bond to increase the stability of silk elastin like proteins (SELPs). The strengthened polymer network would be a perfect material to produce biological wound bindings which are very thin and would be able to interact with the natural tissue matrix (Boateng et al., 2008).
Terminus independent fusion proteins
Figure 1: Reaction of the 1,2‑aminothiol of cysteine and CBT to luciferin (Liang et al., 2010).
Figure 2: Specific binding reaction of CL and CBT-asparagine.
Nε-L-cysteinyl-L-lysine
- Name: Nε-L-cysteinyl-L-lysine
- Short: CL
- Molecular Weight: 249.33 g mol-1
- Storage: -20 – 4 °C
- Function: Terminus independent binding system
Figure 3: Structure of CL.
Nγ-2-cyanobenzothiazol-6-yl-L-asparagine
Figure 4: Structure of CBT‑asparagine.
- Name: Nγ‑2‑cyanobenzothiazol‑6‑yl‑L‑asparagine
- Short: CBT‑asparagine
- Molecular Weight: 290.30 g mol-1
- Storage: -20 – 4 °C
- Function: Terminus independent binding system
Silk Elastin like Proteins
Figure 5: Schematic structure of a SELP polymer network.
Silk consensus sequences (GAGAGS) are shown in green,
elastin consensus sequences (VPAVG) in red and the blue lines indicate the hydrogen bonds of the consensus sequences.
Figure 6: Schematic sequence of the SELP (Collins et al., 2013).
Silk consensus sequences (S)
are shown in green and elastin consensus sequences (E) in red.
Figure 7: Schematic structure of a SELP polymer network including CL and CBT-asparagine.
CL and CBT-asparagine (purple) are introduced between the silk (green) and elastin (red) repeats.
Recursive Directional Ligation by Plasmid Reconstruction (PRe-RDL)
Figure 8: Scheme of the PRe-RDL according to McDaniel et al., 2010 and applied to pSB1C3 containing one elastin consensus sequence. The Pre-RDL consists of 3 steps, two different digestions (step 1 and 2) and one ligation (step 3).
Figure 9: Design of BBa_K2201250 and BBa_K2201251.
References
Collins, T., Azevedo-silva, J., Costa, A., Branca, F., Machado, R., and Casal, M. (2013). Batch production of a silk-elastin-like protein in E . coli BL21 ( DE3 ): key parameters for optimisation. Microb. Cell Fact. 12: 1–16.
Liang, G., Ren, H., and Rao, J. (2010). A biocompatible condensation reaction for controlled assembly of nanostructures in living cells. Nat. Chem. 2: 54–60.
McDaniel, J.R., Mackay, J.A., Quiroz, F.G., and Chilkoti, A. (2010). Recursive Directional Ligation by Plasmid Reconstruction allows Rapid and Seamless Cloning of Oligomeric Genes. 11: 944–952.
Nguyen, D.P., Elliott, T., Holt, M., Muir, T.W., and Chin, J.W. (2011). Genetically Encoded 1,2-Aminothiols Facilitate Rapid and Site-Specific Protein Labeling via a Bio-orthogonal Cyanobenzothiazole Condensation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133: 11418–11421.
Rnjak-Kovacina, J., Daamen, W.F., Pierna, M., Rodríguez-Cabello, J.C., and Weiss, A.S. (2011). Elastin Biopolymers. Compr. Biomater.: 329–346.