Difference between revisions of "Team:OUC-China/Demonstrate"

 
(38 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
<title>Demonstrate</title>
 
<title>Demonstrate</title>
 
<style type="text/css">
 
<style type="text/css">
body{padding-top: 50px;}
+
.ouc-right{position: relative;}
.ouc-navbar{background-color:#008EA1; top:15px;}
+
.ouc-rightnav{position:absolute;right: -200%;top: 0; display: none;background-color: white;width: 200%; z-index: 2001}
.ouc-nav-a{color: white;}
+
.ouc-right:visited{background-color:#D2D2D2; color: white;text-decoration: none;}
#ouc-logo{padding-top:5px;}
+
.ouc-right:hover .ouc-rightnav{display: inherit;}
#ouc-logo:hover{background-color:#008EA1;}
+
.ouc-rightnav a{background-color: white; color: #008EA1; width: 100%;height: 40px; line-height: 40px;}
 +
.ouc-rightnav a:visited {color: #008EA1;text-decoration: none; }
 +
.ouc-rightnav a:hover {background-color:#D2D2D2; color: white;text-decoration: none; }
 +
.ouc-vicedown{position: absolute; top:50px; }
 +
.ouc-vicedown a{display: block;height: 40px; width: 100%;text-decoration: none;color: #008EA1; line-height: 40px;text-align: center;}
 +
.ouc-vicedown a:visited{color:#008EA1;text-decoration: none }
 +
.ouc-vicedown a:hover{color:  #EDEC8Cl}
 +
 
 +
 +
.ouc-nav{color:white; background-color: #008EA1;display:block; width: 100%; color: white;padding: 0}
 +
.ouc-nav:visited{text-decoration: none; color: white}
 +
.ouc-nav:hover{text-decoration: none; background-color: white; color:#008EA1; }
 +
.ouc-navbar{position: relative;padding: 0;margin: 0;}
 +
.ouc-navbar:hover .ouc-down{display: inherit;}
 +
.ouc-down{position: absolute; top:50px;display: none;background-color: white; z-index: 1001}
 +
.ouc-navdown{color: #008EA1;display: block; width: 100%;height: 40px;}
 +
.ouc-navdown:visited{text-decoration: none;color:#008EA1; }
 +
.ouc-navdown:hover{background-color:#D2D2D2;color: white;text-decoration: none; z-index: 1501}
 +
.ouc-guide{position: fixed; width: 100%;top: 15px;z-index:1000}
 
.ouc-page-header{border-bottom-color: #EDEC8C;border-bottom-width: thick;color: #008F75;}
 
.ouc-page-header{border-bottom-color: #EDEC8C;border-bottom-width: thick;color: #008F75;}
 
.top{position: fixed;bottom:0;right: 0;}
 
.top{position: fixed;bottom:0;right: 0;}
 
.top:hover{animation: upp 0.6s ;}
 
.top:hover{animation: upp 0.6s ;}
 +
 
@keyframes upp {
 
@keyframes upp {
 
0% {margin-bottom: 0;}
 
0% {margin-bottom: 0;}
Line 21: Line 40:
 
}
 
}
 
.ouc-reserve{background-color: #008EA1;color: white;}
 
.ouc-reserve{background-color: #008EA1;color: white;}
     .ouc-heading {color: #008EA1;}
+
     .ouc-heading {margin: 0;color: #008EA1;}
 
</style>
 
</style>
 
</head>
 
</head>
Line 27: Line 46:
 
<body>
 
<body>
 
<!--此处是导航-->
 
<!--此处是导航-->
<div class="navbar navbar-fixed-top ouc-navbar" role="navigation">
+
<div class="ouc-guide" style="height: 50px;background-color:#008EA1 ;">
    <ul class="nav navbar-nav">
+
<div class="row">
        <li><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China" class="navbar-brand" id="ouc-logo"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/89/T--OUC-China--logo.jpg" width="66" height="40" /></a></li>
+
 
        <li class="dropdown">
+
<div class="col-md-2 navbar-header" style="text-align: center; padding: 0">
            <a data-toggle="dropdown" class="dropdown-toggle ouc-nav-a">Team<span class="caret"></span></a>
+
            <ul class="dropdown-menu">
+
<button class="navbar-toggle" type="button" data-toggle="collapse" data-target=".navbar-responsive-collapse">
                <li><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Team">Members</a></li>
+
        <span class="sr-only">Toggle Navigation</span>
                <li><a href="#">Collaborations</a></li>
+
        <span class="caret" style="color: white"></span>
                <li><a href="#">Attributions</a></li>
+
 
            </ul>
+
      </button>
        </li>
+
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/89/T--OUC-China--logo.jpg" height="50px"/></a></div>
        <li class="dropdown">
+
            <a href="#" data-toggle="dropdown" class="dropdown-toggle ouc-nav-a">Project<spam class="caret"></span></a>
+
            <ul class="dropdown-menu">
+
<div class="collapse navbar-collapse navbar-responsive-collapse" style="padding: 0">
                <li><a href="#">Description</a></li>
+
                <li><a href="#">Design</a></li>
+
                 <li><a href="#">Experiments</a></li>
+
                <li><a href="#">Results</a></li>
+
<div class="col-md-1" style="padding: 0"></div>
                <li><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/InterLab">Interlab</a></li>
+
<div class="col-md-1 ouc-navbar" style="padding: 0">
                <li><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Notebook" >Notebook</a></li>
+
    <a href="##" style="line-height: 50px;text-align: center" class="ouc-nav">Team<span class="caret"></span></a>
            </ul>
+
    <div class="ouc-down" style=" width: 100%; text-align: center">
        </li>
+
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Team" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Members</a></div>
        <li>
+
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Collaborations" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Collaborations</a></div>
            <a href="#" data-toggle="dropdown" class="dropdown-toggle ouc-nav-a">Model</a>
+
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Attributions" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Attributions</a></div>
        </li>
+
    </div>
        <li><a href="#" class="ouc-nav-a">Parts</a></li>
+
</div>
        <li><a href="#" class="ouc-nav-a">Safety</a></li>
+
<div class="col-md-1 ouc-navbar" style="padding: 0">
        <li><a href="#" class="ouc-nav-a">Human Practice</a></li>
+
    <a href="##" style="line-height: 50px;text-align: center" class="ouc-nav">Project<span class="caret"></span></a>
    </ul>
+
    <div class="ouc-down" style=" width: 100%; text-align: center">
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Description" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Description</a></div>
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Design" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Design</a></div>
 +
                 <div class="ouc-right">
 +
        <a style="line-height: 40px; font-size: 15px;" class="ouc-navdown" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/proof1">Proof of concept</a>
 +
        <div class="ouc-rightnav">
 +
        <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/proof1" style="display: block">Basic fermentation</a>
 +
        <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/proof2" style="display: block">Adhesion platform</a>
 +
        <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/proof3" style="display: block">MINI-GRE</a>
 +
        </div>
 +
    </div>
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Demonstrate" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Demonstration</a></div>
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/InterLab" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">InterLab</a></div>
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Improve" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Improvement</a></div>
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Notebook" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Notebook</a></div>
 +
    </div>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="col-md-1" style="padding: 0"><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Model" style="line-height: 50px;text-align: center" class="ouc-nav">Model</a></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-1" style="padding: 0"><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Parts" style="line-height: 50px;text-align: center" class="ouc-nav">Parts</a></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-1" style="padding: 0"><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Safety" style="line-height: 50px;text-align: center" class="ouc-nav">Safety</a></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-2 ouc-navbar" style="padding: 0">
 +
    <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Engagement" style="line-height: 50px;text-align: center" class="ouc-nav">Human Practice<span class="caret"></span></a>
 +
    <div class="ouc-down" style=" width: 100%; text-align: center">
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/HumanPractice" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Overview</a></div>
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/HP/Silver" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Silver</a></div>
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/HP/Gold_Integrated" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Gold and integrated</a></div>
 +
    <div><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/Engagement" style="line-height: 40px; " class="ouc-navdown">Engagement</a></div>
 +
    </div>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="col-md-2" style="padding: 0"></div>
 +
 +
 +
</div>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<!--此处是导航-->
 
<!--此处是导航-->
Line 61: Line 117:
 
<div class="container">
 
<div class="container">
 
     <div class="page-header ouc-page-header">
 
     <div class="page-header ouc-page-header">
         <h1><strong>Demonstrate</strong></h1>
+
         <h1><strong>Demonstration</strong></h1>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
     <h3 class="ouc-heading"><strong>Basic fermentation</strong></h3>
+
     <h2 class="ouc-heading" id="fermentation"><strong>Basic fermentation</strong></h2>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     Our basic fermentation part derives from our local environmental problem, the outbreak of <i>Enteromorpha</i> along the coastline in Qingdao, so it is natural that we would eventually go back to the origin and try to solve the real world problem after validation of design concept in the lab. We aim to make use of <i>Enteromorpha</i> residue, where there is no trehalose left because it is the easiest to extract. Therefore, all we need to do is to deal with the cellulose and hemicellulose left in the residue.   
+
     Our basic fermentation part derives from our local environmental problem, the outbreak of <i>Enteromorpha</i> along the coastline in Qingdao, so it is natural that we would eventually go back to the origin and try to solve the real world problem after validation of design concept in the lab. We aim to make use of <i>Enteromorpha</i> residue, where there is no trehalose left because it is easiest to extract. Therefore, all we need to do is to deal with the cellulose and hemicellulose left in the residue.   
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     And we do treat our <i>Enteromorpha</i> powder with enzymes first and yeast later. The successful survival of the recombinant yeast strains that can use either xylose or cellubiose as the only carbon source can fully prove the feasibility of our designed pathway.  
+
     We do treat our <i>Enteromorpha</i> powder with enzymes first and yeast later.(the <i>Enteromorpha</i> powder serves as the stimulation of <i>Enteromorpha</i> residue in real-world situation) The successful survival of the recombinant yeast strains that can use either xylose or cellubiose as the only carbon source can fully prove the feasibility of our designed pathway.  
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
Line 74: Line 130:
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <div class="container">
 
     <div class="container">
     <h3 class="ouc-heading" style="color: #66BCC7"><strong><i>Enteromorpha</i> pretreatment</strong></h3>
+
     <h2 class="ouc-heading" style="color: #66BCC7" id="enter"><strong><i>Enteromorpha</i> pretreatment</strong></h2>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
         We treat the Enteromorpha powder (residue) with 0.2% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to remove the lignin then cellulase and xylanase to produce xylose & cellubiose.  
 
         We treat the Enteromorpha powder (residue) with 0.2% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to remove the lignin then cellulase and xylanase to produce xylose & cellubiose.  
Line 81: Line 137:
 
     <div class="col-md-4">
 
     <div class="col-md-4">
 
     <p style="color: gray;text-align: center;">
 
     <p style="color: gray;text-align: center;">
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/24/T--OUC-China--demo1.jpg" width="350px"/><br/>
+
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1b/T--OUC-China--pro1.jpg" width="350px"/><br/>
 
                     Figure 1.1 Enteromorpha Powder
 
                     Figure 1.1 Enteromorpha Powder
 
                 </p>
 
                 </p>
Line 99: Line 155:
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
    
 
    
     <h3 class="ouc-heading" style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Pretreatment validation</strong></h3>
+
     <h2 class="ouc-heading" style="color: #66BCC7" id="pre"><strong>Pretreatment validation</strong></h2>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     After that we detect the existence of them with HPLC. The peak appears at the same point suggesting that they are the same substance. In other words, we successfully proved that the downstream product of <i>Enteromorpha</i> powder after pretreatment contains mainly xylose and cellubiose.
+
     After that we detect the existence of xylose & cellubiose with HPLC. The peak appears at the same point, suggesting that they are the same substance. In other words, we successfully proved that the downstream product of <i>Enteromorpha</i> powder after pretreatment contains mainly xylose and cellubiose.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <div class="row">
 
     <div class="row">
Line 133: Line 189:
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
    
 
    
     <h3 class="ouc-heading" style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Yeast A that Ferment xylose</strong></h3>
+
     <h2 class="ouc-heading" style="color: #66BCC7" id="yeasta"><strong>Yeast A that ferments xylose</strong></h2>
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    
        We first get the right fragments of XYL1,XYL2 through PCR then use pYC230 provided by our PI as our backbone and integrate xylosidase gene xyl1 and xyl2 through Gibson. The AGE result shows our periodical success.
+
    </p>
+
 
    
 
    
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
         After introducing the plasmid into <i>S.cerevisiae</i> EBY100 and construct the xylose-utilize strain successfully, we measured the growth rate of both our recombinant strain and negative control to prove the superiority of our new strain in xylose utilization.
+
         After introducing the plasmid we constructed that contains gene <i>XYL1</i>,<i>XYL2</i> into <i>S.cerevisiae</i> EBY100. We creat a xylose-utilize strain. We measured the growth rate of both our recombinant strain and negative control to prove the superiority of our new strain in xylose utilization.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
<p style="font-size: 20px">
 
<p style="font-size: 20px">
We cultivate the EBY100(XDH-XR) and the EBY100(control) in SC adding 2% xylose as the sole carbon source, adjusting initial OD<sub>600</sub> about 1.2,and placing in the shaking incubator of 30℃,180rpm to ferment.
+
We cultivate the EBY100(XDH-XR) and the EBY100(control) in SC adding 2% xylose as the sole carbon source, adjusting initial OD<sub>600</sub> about 1.2,and placing in the shaking incubator of 30℃,180rpm to ferment.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     The following result can well demonstrate that the strain that carries our plasmid grows much better than the strain that not and reach the stationary phases after 40 hours’cultivation.
+
     The following result can well demonstrate that the strain that carries our plasmid grows much better than the strain that not (the stationary phase OD of EBY100(XDH-XR)is nearly 2 times that of WT EBY100)and reach the stationary phases after 40 hours’cultivation.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
    
 
    
Line 151: Line 205:
 
     <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
     <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/73/T--OUC-China--pro1-4.png" width="700"/>
 
     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/73/T--OUC-China--pro1-4.png" width="700"/>
     <br/>Figure 1.8 Growth curve of strains of our recombinant strain and negative control.
+
     <br/>Figure 1.8 Growth curve of strains of our recombinant strain and negative control. Error bars represent standard deviation of four biological replicates, so do the other charts in this section.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
    
 
    
Line 158: Line 212:
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     The following chart shows the xylose content of both our recombinant strain and negative control. It is obvious that in our xylose-utilize strain, xylose content decrease as time goes by while for the negative strain the xylose content stays steady, indicating the disability of using xylose.
+
     The following chart shows the xylose content of both our recombinant strain and negative control. It is obvious that in our xylose-utilize strain, xylose content decrease (especially rapid in the first 40h) as time goes by while for the negative strain the xylose content stays steady, indicating the disability of using xylose.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
    
 
    
Line 188: Line 242:
 
    
 
    
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     We use pYC230 provided by our PI as our backbone and integrate cellubiose-degrading gene CDT and GH-1 through Gibson.
+
     For the cellulose plasmid, we integrate cellubiose-degrading gene CDT and GH-1 into pYC230 by Gibson.
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    The bright band in the AGE result shows that we successfully get the fragments of GH-1, CDT-1 through PCR. The following experiment includes splicing the fragments onto the backbone pYC230.
+
    </p>
+
 
    
 
    
 
     <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
     <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ec/T--OUC-China--demo19.png" width="700"/>
+
     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/47/T--OUC-China--basic.png" width="600px"/>
    <br/>Figure 1.11
+
    <br/>Fig 1.9 from lane 1 to 7 respectively:pYC230-GH1-CDT1 single enzyme digestion; pYC230-XYL1-XYL2 single enzyme digestion;marker; pYC230-GH1-CDT1 circular plasmid;pYC230-XYL1-XYL2 circular plasmid; marker
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
    
 
    
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     We introduce the plasmid into <i>S.cerevisiae</i> EBY100 and construct the cellubiose-utilize strain successfully then test the growth rate of both our recombinant strain and negative control.
+
     We introduce the plasmid into <i>S.cerevisiae</i> EBY100 and construct the cellubiose-utilize strain successfully and then test the growth rate of both our recombinant strain and negative control.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
Line 223: Line 273:
 
             <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
             <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6e/T--OUC-China--demo20.png" width="450"/>
 
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6e/T--OUC-China--demo20.png" width="450"/>
             <br/>Figure 1.12
+
             <br/>Figure 1.12 Concentration of cellobiose,ethanol as well as OD600 of biomass change in 140h for cellobiose-recombinant strain
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 229: Line 279:
 
             <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
             <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/59/T--OUC-China--demo21.png" width="450"/>
 
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/59/T--OUC-China--demo21.png" width="450"/>
             <br/>Figure 1.13  
+
             <br/>Figure 1.13 Concentration of cellobiose,ethanol as well as OD600 of biomass change in 140h for negative control
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 240: Line 290:
 
             <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
             <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fc/T--OUC-China--pro1-12.png" width="450"/>
 
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fc/T--OUC-China--pro1-12.png" width="450"/>
             <br/>Figure 1.14  
+
             <br/>Figure 1.14 The glucose concentration  change in 140h for recombinant EBY100(CDT-1-GH-1)  and WT EBY100
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 246: Line 296:
 
             <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
             <p style="color: gray;text-align: center">
 
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9c/T--OUC-China--pro1-13.png" width="450"/>
 
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9c/T--OUC-China--pro1-13.png" width="450"/>
             <br/>Figure 1.15  
+
             <br/>Figure 1.15 The ethanol concentration  change in 140h for recombinant EBY100(CDT-1-GH-1)  and WT EBY100
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 256: Line 306:
 
    
 
    
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     Despite that we can tell from the distinct difference between cellubiose-consuming strain and negative control that our approach of using yeast to transform <i>Enteromorpha</i> residue into ethanol finally worked!
+
     Despite that, we can tell from the distinct difference between cellubiose-consuming strain and negative control that our approach of using yeast to transform <i>Enteromorpha</i> residue into ethanol finally worked!
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
    
 
    
 +
     
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     Our idea has been turn into real-world practice!
+
     We successfully confirmed in lab through simulation that our idea has been turn into real-world practice!
 +
 
 +
<br/><br/><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/proof1">See more details in our proof page</a>
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 +
     
 
     <br/><br/><br/><br/>
 
     <br/><br/><br/><br/>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 273: Line 327:
 
      
 
      
 
      
 
      
     <h3 class="ouc-heading"><strong>Mini system</strong></h3>
+
     <h2 class="ouc-heading" id="mini"><strong>MINI-GRE</strong></h2>
 +
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Circuit construction</strong></h3>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     We set four different permutations for our mini promoter and mini terminator thus constructed four different circuits. For each one, the strength level of promoters are characterized by yECitrine, a kind of yellow fluorescent protein. And we use red fluorescent protein mStrawberry to represent the read through of terminators.
+
     To explore the feasibility of MINI-GRE(genetic regulatory elements) by combination of promoters and terminators as we mentioned above, we designed four promoter-terminator pairs, and constructed four different report circuits for them (fig. A)
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     In the wet lab study, we measured both the expression level of YFP and RFP to validate the expected performance of the MINI system in comparation of normal promoters and terminators whose expression level are measured as well.
+
     For circuit 1, we pair promoter CYC1 with terminator CYC1, which are among the most commonly used native promoters and terminators and also have a relative medium strength in yeast.[4] For circuit 2, promoter CYC1 is paired with terminator MINI. The MINIp-CYC1t and MINIp-MINIt, respectively, serves as the chosen pair for circuit 3 and 4.    </P>
 +
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
 +
    For convenience, we named the“CYC1p-yECitrine-CYC1t-mStrawberry-CYC1t”as“CC”,“CYC1p-yECitrine-MINIt-mStrawberry-CYC1t”as“CM”,“MINIp-yECitrine-CYC1t-mStrawberry-CYC1t”as“MC”, and“MINIp-yECitrine-MINIt-mStrawberry-CYC1t” as “MM”,hereafter.
 +
    </p>
 +
    <div class="row">
 +
        <div class="col-md-6">
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e2/T--OUC-China--pro3-1-1.png" width="500px"/>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="col-md-6">
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c5/T--OUC-China--pro3-1-2.png" width="500px"/>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
  <div class="row">
 +
        <div class="col-md-6">
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6c/T--OUC-China--pro3-1-3.png" width="500px"/>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="col-md-6">
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2e/T--OUC-China--pro3-1-4.png" width="500px"/>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
    <p style="text-align: center; color: gray">
 +
    Fig. A the plasmid map of our circuit CC, CM, MC, MM. The CC circuit includes the commonly used native promoter CYC1 and terminator CYC1. The MM circuit includes the combination of MINI promoter and MINI terminator.  
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 +
   
 +
   
 +
   
 +
   
 +
   
 +
   
 +
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Results</strong></h3>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     Meanwhile, we monitored the growth rate of the recombinant yeast to specify the expression of MINI system at a particular living stage. Moreover, we conducted qPCR towards corresponding protein in order for a further validation of MINI system’s strong expression on a post-transcriptional level.  
+
     For each circuit, the strength of promoters was characterized by yECitrine, a kind of yellow fluorescent protein was used to detect the output level of particular promoter, terminator or promoter-terminator pair. And the red fluorescent signal from RFP mStrawberry can represent the relative read-through efficiency of particular terminator in the circuits including the same promoter.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
    We also expend the application range of this system by contact with other teams and test it in different yeast strains and experimental environment, which can also be an important part of our collaboration. the MINI system has a high performance ratio in driving gene expression. The obvious advantage of the MINI system is to provide a simple model for studying promoter mutations and promoter modifications.
+
          While monitoring the growth rate of four strains containing different expression regulatory devices, we also characterized the expression strength of the promoter-terminator pairs by detecting the fluorescence intensity of yECitrine in each circuit. As we can see in the bar chart, the ratio and relationship of the signals from 4 circuits become relatively stable at the early stationary phase, which hints that the expression level may reach the dynamic steady state at the time point 22 hours. And the results from 22 hours point also match the strength relationship of the two promoters in previous research, although we used another yeast strain here. [2, 5] Therefore, comparing with the mid-log phase data, we tend to believe that this results can reflect the true dynamic characteristics of the genetic regulatory devices, although we will research this phenomenon in our future work.(Fig. D)
 +
 
 +
    </p>
 +
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
 +
    So, in order to better reflect the dynamic behaviors of the circuits we tend to use data from mid-log phase during the growth process.
 +
    <div class="row">
 +
        <div class="col-md-6">
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b2/T--OUC-China--pro3-2-1.png" width="500px"/>
 +
</div>
 +
        <div class="col-md-6">
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/43/T--OUC-China--pro3-2-2.png" width="500px"/>
 +
</div>
 +
    </div>
 +
    <div class="row">
 +
        <div class="col-md-6">
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/15/T--OUC-China--pro3-2-3.png" width="500px"/>
 +
</div>
 +
        <div class="col-md-6">
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/25/T--OUC-China--pro3-2-4.png" width="500px"/>
 +
</div>
 +
    </div>
 +
    <p style="text-align: center; color: gray">
 +
    Fig. B The growth curve of the four strains with different promoter- terminator pairs. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.
 +
 
 +
    </p>
 +
    <p style="text-align: center; color: gray">
 +
        <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/10/T--OUC-China--pro3-3-0.png" width="800px"/>
 +
    <br/>Fig. C The fluorescence/Abs600 in different time. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.
 +
    <p style="text-align: center; color: gray">
 +
        <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1e/T--OUC-China--pro3-3.png" width="800px"/>
 +
    <br/>Fig.D The fluorescence/Abs600 of strains with different promoter-terminator pairs, after being cultivating for 22 hours. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
      
 
      
     <div class="container">
+
      
        <h3 class="ouc-heading" style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Circuit construction</strong></h3>
+
   
 +
   
 +
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Function Verification of promoters and terminators</strong></h3>
 +
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
 +
    Through comparing “CC” with “CM”, we can learn that the Fluorescence/Abs600 of “CM”is nearly three times of “CC”, proving that the strength of MINI terminator is higher than that of CYC1 terminator. (Fig. D)(At first we think of measuring this characteristic by comparing yECitrine fluorescence /mStrawberry fluorescence. However, considering that the fluorescence of mStrawberry is too low, we cannot expect an accurate result due to the high error rate. ) We assume that both MINI terminators and CYC1 terminators can effectively stop the transcription, so the mRNA of mStrawberry generated behind these terminators can hardly be detected, neither does the fluorescence of mStrawberry. 
 +
  
<p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    </p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/62/T--OUC-China--pro3-1.png" width="800px"/>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
<br/>Figure 2.1 The plasmid map of our circuit.
+
    What’s more, the Fluorescence/Abs600 of “MM”is also nearly 3-fold compared with “MC”, proving that the strength of MINI promoter is higher than CYC1 promoter.  
</p>
+
+
<p style="font-size: 20px">
+
We synthesized minip, minit, cyc1p, cyc1t and built four circuit with Gibson assembly by arranging them in different orders. The plasmids were then imported into yeast EBY100.
+
</p>
+
  
 
  
       
 
       
 
        <h3 class="ouc-heading" style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Function verify</strong></h3>
 
        <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
        We characterize the strength of the MINI system by detecting the fluorescence intensity of the yeCitrine. We measured the growth curves of four strains containing different expression systems, and measured the intensity of excitation and emission of yeCitrine, respectively 502nm and 532nm.
 
        </p>
 
<p style="font-size: 20px">
 
For convenience, we named the “Pmini-yECitrine-Tcyc1-mStrawberry-Tcyc1” as “mc”, “Pmini-yECitrine-Tmini-mStrawberry-Tcyc1” as “mm”, “Pcyc1-yECitrine-Tcyc1-mStrawberry-Tcyc1” as “cc” and “Pcyc1-yECitrine-Tmini-mStrawberry-Tcyc1” as “cm” hereafter.
 
</p>
 
        <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
 
        <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1e/T--OUC-China--pro3-3.png" width="600px"/>
 
        <br/>Figure 2.2 The strength of the MINI system.
 
        </p>
 
        <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
        The fluorescence intensity is: mm> cm> mc> cc, in which mm circuit has the highest expression, proving our successful construction of MINI system. To draw a conclusion, the system has a strong expression, but a very short nucleotide sequence. In this example, the combination of weak promoter + strong terminator is better than that of strong promoter + weak terminator.
 
        </p>
 
        <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
        With the help of the other two teams, we completed the repeated testing of the MINI system. The time of the test data is the late logarithmic phase of yeast growth. The yeast strains we used with NJU-China were Saccharomyces cerevisiae EBY 100. The yeast strain used in TJU China was Synthetic yeast synX.
 
        </p>
 
        <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
 
        <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/ca/T--OUC-China--pro3-4.png" width="600px" />
 
        <br/>Figure 2.3 MINI system fluorescence measurements from three teams, OUC-Chian,TJU-China, NJU-China (left to right).
 
        </p>
 
        <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
        Through the fluorescence intensity map, we have not yet clear the true advantage of MINI system. But from the following figure, we can directly observe the relationship between a nucleotide base number and fluorescence intensity. The red arrows indicate the short and strong features of the mm gene circuit.
 
        </p>
 
        <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
 
        <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/15/T--OUC-China--pro3-5.png" width="600px"/>
 
        <br/>Figure 2.4 Promoter and terminator of the nucleotide base length and intensity(For example, mm represents the base length of Pmini + Tmini).
 
        </p>
 
        <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
        In order to verify that the MINI system was able to work in a variety of yeast strains, we invited other teams to conduct a repeat experiment. Especially in TJU-China, the use of their own synthesis of yeast to complete this experiment also verified the MINI system with versatility.
 
        </p>
 
       
 
        <h3 class="ouc-heading" style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Validation of expression on transcription level</strong></h3>
 
        <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
        The result of qPCR shows that at 22<sup>nd</sup> hour the system reached the highest expression intensity and the expression of four circuits is shown below. The error bars indicate s.d. of mean of experiments in triplicate.
 
        </p>
 
        <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
 
        <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/46/T--OUC-China--pro3-6.png" width="800px"/>
 
        <br/>Figure 2.5 The expression of four circuits at 22<sup>nd</sup> hour.
 
        </p>
 
        <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
        In the chart, the RNA content of yECitrine comes as the following order: mm>mc>cm>cc, which is not completely consist with the result of protein level. mm’s RNA content is several times that of cc. Compared to Figure b, this difference in RNA content does not reflect the protein content very well, yet still, our MINI system has an obvious superiority over normal combination (cc), which confirmed our hypothesis. As shown above, generally the magnitude of leakage is over 100 times smaller, so it can be ignored to some extent.
 
        </p>
 
        <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
        To draw a conclusion, mm has the smallest size and the strongest expression with a leakage that can almost be ignored. What’s more our system functions well in different strains and experimental conditions, which proves its potential to apply in various situations.
 
        </p>
 
       
 
       
 
</div>
 
<h3 class="ouc-heading"><strong>Co-express platform</strong></h3>
 
<p style="font-size: 20px">
 
    We use ice-nuclei to display the monomer streptavidin on the surface of <i>E.coli</i> outer membrane and Aga1p-Aga2p system to display the biotin on the yeast cell wall. The two form a covalent linkage and bind with other firmly, establishing a co-express platform.
 
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     After sub cloning our target gene onto the vectors successfully, we introduced them to ei-ther <i>E.coli</i> or <i>S.cerevisiae</i> to confirm the expression and correct function of corresponding protein, which means they need to be integrated in the out membrane or cell wall. Therefore, we conduct Western Blot so that we can prove our result specifically. Af-ter that, we will need to verify that the heterogeneous cells do adhere to each other through the combination of biotin and mSA. With rhodamine-polyethylene glycol-biotin and FITC-streptavidin, we conducted immunofluorescence staining on both <i>E.coli</i> and <i>S.cerevisiae</i>, and by measuring two florescent, we had a visual validation of parts work. Meanwhile, we explored the optimal condition for their co-culture and drew a con-clusion after preliminary experiment that we will inoculate the yeast in the medium contain-ing galactose and introduce <i>E.coli</i> after 30 hours’cultivation.
+
     In addition, when we compared “MM” with “CC” which is the commonly used promoter-terminator pair, we found that the difference is nearly 6-fold. (Fig. D)
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
 
     <p style="font-size: 20px">
     For more solid a proof of their adhesion, we use Immunofluorescent localization to demonstrate their relative location and took photos with STM for their microstructure. What’s more, we would to acquired some quantitative data such as the percentage of link-age and expression with FCM. As a result, we can say that our co-expression platform was established successfully.
+
     From our results, we confirmed that the MINI promoter and MINI terminator do be superior to CYC1 promoter and CYC1 terminator, not only in length but also in strength. (Fig. E)
 +
 
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
    <div class="container">
+
    <p style="text-align: center; color: gray">
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong><i>E.coli</i> strain construction</strong></h3>
+
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/15/T--OUC-China--pro3-5.png" width="800px"/>
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    <br/>Fig. E Length and output level of 4 different promoter–terminator combination. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates
    We assume expressing monomer streptavidin on the outer membrane of <i>E.coli</i> will help us using biotin-avidin system to link <i>E.coli</i> and <i>S.cerevisiae</i>. In part registry, we find <a href="">BBa_K523013</a> constructed by team Edinburg encoding INP-eYFP. We acquire INP using PCR from this part. Then we choose promoter <a href="">J23106</a> from part registry because it can express protein continuously so that we can have a relative steady co-culture system. The mSA part is from team Peking that give us much help. Monomer streptavidin is much smaller than wild type and is easier to use in circuit. Based on above reasons, we designed J23106-INP-mSA-pSB1C3 plasmid and trans-form into DH5α strain.
+
    </p>
    </p>
+
   
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
   
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e0/T--OUC-China--pro2-1.jpg" width="800px;"/>
+
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Robustness in different host</strong></h3>
    <br/>Figure 3.1 Electrophoresis result of expression vector. Lane1&2 is pYD1-BAP, lane 3&4 is pSB1C3-J23106-INP-mSA, lane5&6 is pYC230-BirA.
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    </p>
+
     In order to verify that the MINI-GRE is able to work with the same rule in a variety of yeast strains and expend the application range of these MINI regulatory devices, we invited other teams to repeat the same experiments in different yeast strains and experimental environment, which can also be an important part of our collaboration.  
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
 
    After the sequencing results confirmed that we successfully cloned the J23106-INP-mSA-PSB1C3 expression vectors, we transformed the target plasmids to DH5α for amplification.
+
    </p>
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
   
+
     The time point of the data collection is early stationary phase of yeast growth. The yeast strains we used with Nanjing-China were Saccharomyces cerevisiae EBY100. The yeast strain used in Tianjin was synX, the yeast strain with chemical synthetic chromosome.  
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Protein expression verification</strong></h3>
+
    </p>
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    If the protein is successfully expressed, they will be displayed on the extracellular mem-brane of the <i>E.coli</i>. Therefore, we can verify protein expression by detecting whether INP-mSA is displayed in the outer membrane protein.
+
    From the result of other colleges, we can know that our MINI-GRE can also work in other yeast strains. (Fig. F)
     </p>
+
    </p>
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    <p style="text-align: center; color: gray">
    We used the Fractionation Separation to extract three components of the outer mem-brane protein, the intimal protein and the cytoplasmic protein of engineered <i>E.coli</i>. Further Western Blot aim to confirm the previous result specifically and We choose to use horseradish peroxidase-biotin because it have the specific ability to bind INP-mSA.
+
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/ca/T--OUC-China--pro3-4.png"/>
    </p>
+
    <br/>Fig. F The fluorescence/Abs600 of strains with different promoter-terminator pairs in the late  from three teams, OUC-China, Tianjin and Nanjing-China(left to right). Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    </p>
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a2/T--OUC-China--pro2-2.png"/>
+
   
    <br/>Figure 3.2 Western blot analysis using HRP-biotin to evaluate JIM expression. lane1, the outer mem-brane of JIM; lane2, the intimal protein of JIM; the cytoplasmic protein of lane3; lane4, the outer membrane DH5α; lane5, the intimal protein of DH5α; lane6, the cytoplasmic protein of DH5α.
+
   
    </p>
+
   
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Transcription Level Assay by qPCR</strong></h3>
    Western Blot result shows that there is a clear protein band at corresponding position with a correct size and the result specifically. It makes sure that we do express INP-mSA on the <i>E.coli</i> surface successfully .
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    </p>
+
    Moreover, we run qPCR towards corresponding protein in order for a further validation of different promoter-terminator combination’s expression on a post-transcriptional level.  
   
+
 
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Protein function verification</strong></h3>
+
    </p>
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    After verifying the protein expression, we want to prove that the protein can function as normal. We used Rhodamine-biotin to immunofluorescence stain the engineerd <i>E.coli</i>  and negative strains  DH5α to observe whether the bacteria had fluorescence under fluorescence microscope.
+
    The result from qPCR assay shows that at the 22nd hour from setting up culture, the circuits reached the highest expression intensity and the expression level of four circuits is shown below.  
     </p>
+
 
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    </p>
    The result proves that the function of protein was normal.
+
    <p style="text-align: center; color: gray">
    </p>
+
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/46/T--OUC-China--pro3-6.png" width="800px"/>
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    <br/>Fig. G The relative transcription level of yECitrine and mStrawberry at the 22nd hour from setting up culture. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/7c/T--OUC-China--connection11.png"/>
+
 
    <br/>Figure 3.3 Rhodamine-biotin immunofluorescence staining of engineerd E.coli(Right) and negative strains(Left).
+
    </p>
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    However, the transcript level of yECitrine doesn’t matched the fluorescence very well. We infer that it may be caused by the experimental error of the total mRNA concentration and the little mismatch of the primers.  
    Meanwhile, we would like to quantify the expression of INP-mSA compared with DH5α with plate reader. When we carried out the experiment, we met the problem that there are different incubating conditions in different paper. So we had to explore the best incubating condition of the INP-mSA protein expression. We did two sets of experiments to compare the fluorescence values of 2h incubation under two conditions (0 ℃ and 30 ℃).
+
 
    </p>
+
    </p>
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/7e/T--OUC-China--pro2-4.png"/>
+
    Luckily, we can still learn that the transcript level of mStrawberry is very low, which means the transcriptional read through of both CYC1t and MINI terminator can be overlooked; they can efficiently terminate the transcription, which confirmed the assumption before.  
    <br/>Figure 3.4 Expression level of INP-mSA fusion protein under different conditions.( I )  the fluores-cence values of <i>E.coli</i> DH5α cell expressing JIM fusion and DH5α under 0 ℃  incu-bation for 2h. ( II ) the fluorescence values of <i>E.coli</i> DH5α cell expressing JIM fusion and DH5α under 30 ℃.
+
    </p>
    </p>
+
<h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3>
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    The image showed that <i>E. coli</i> containing Jim Plasmid successfully expressed INP-MSA fusion protein. The fluorescence value was higher after incubation of dye 2h under 30 ℃ conditions. We speculate that there may be an ice dye incubation that causes ice nucleation proteins to form crystals that inhibit the combination of fluorescent dyes and the MSA of fusion proteins. 
+
    To draw a conclusion, from our experiments, we confirmed the superiority of the MINI-GRE (MINI promoter-MINI terminator pair), which can be summed into three aspects:
    </p>
+
    </p>
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    Moreover, we want to confirm the connection between E.coli and S.cerevisiae by FACS analysis, because this analysis method can observe in single-cell level. We can use Rhoda-mine-polyethylene glycol-biotin to dye the <i>E.coli</i> containing JIM Plasmid for char-acterizing the expression of the protein by fluorescence detection.
+
     (1) Short but strong, which decreases the possibility of undesired homologous reorganization and provide significant output strength compared with commonly used promoter-terminator pair.
    </p>
+
    </p>
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    Unfortunately, however, we found the Beckman flow cytometry (FCM) in our university couldn’t excite our fluorescent dye rhodamine-biotin so we was not able to use it to catch dyed <i>E.coli</i>. In spite of this, luckily we found that we can use FCM to confirm the ex-pression of biotin and its expressing percent. We use FITC-streptavidin to stain on <i>S.cerevisiae</i> and use 488nm exciting light to excite it while receive it at 525nm. As the result showed, the fluorescent peak shifted towards the direction of stronger fluorescent, which means positive sample express more BAP. Compared with the results of empty sam-ple, we can ensure that BAP is displayed on the surface of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Above the threshold, there are 48% of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the positive sample. While in the negative sample and empty sample, the percentage is only 28%.  
+
    (2) Versatile,which can work in different yeast strains and provide robust function for extensive application.
    </p>
+
    </p>
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/aa/T--OUC-China--pro2-5.png"/>
+
     (3) Well-modularited, has good modularity because of the low transcriptional read through efficiency from minimal terminator, which is an important characteristic in synthetic biology.  
    <br/>Figure 3.5
+
<br/><br/><br/><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:OUC-China/proof3">See more details in our proof page</a>
    </p>
+
    </p>
   
+
 
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Yeast strain construction</strong></h3>
+
 
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
 
    Here we need to construct the vector of BirA (biotin ligase) and BAP (biotin acceptor peptide) in yeast for displaying biotin on the surface.
+
 
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    We first cloned birA into the yeast-shuttle plasmid pYC230. After transformation, it ena-bles the yeast to transfer biotin to biotin-receiving peptide bap. pYD1 is another 5.0 KB ex-pression vector designed for expression, secretion, and display of proteins on the extracel-lular surface of <i>S.cerevisiae</i>. The vector contains AGA2 gene from <i>S.cerevisiae</i> encoding one subunit of the a-agglutinin receptor. Fusing our gene of interest to AGA2, so we can enable the yeast to display the biotin on the extracelluar surface.  
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e0/T--OUC-China--pro2-1.jpg" width="800px;"/>
+
    <br/>Figure 3.6 Electrophoresis result of expression vector. Lane1&2 is pYD1-BAP, lane 3&4 is pSB1C3-J23106-INP-mSA, lane5&6 is pYC230-BirA.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    After successful construction of plasmids, we introduced pYD1 containing BAP and pYC230 containing Bira into <i>S.cerevisiae</i> EBY100.
+
    </p>
+
   
+
   
+
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Protein expression verification</strong></h3>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    We want to test whether biotinylated bap is successfully integrated in the yeast cell wall. So we dye engineered yeast and negative control respectively with FITC-streptavidin. Using fluorescence microscopy we are able to observe the fluorescence of both.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/85/T--OUC-China--pro2-7.png"/>
+
    <br/>Figure 3.7 The fluorescent staining of yeast with FITC-Streptomyces. (left) <i>S.cerevisiae</i> EBY100 without target gene; (middle) <i>S.cerevisiae</i> EBY100 with BAP+Bira though galactose induction for 12h; (right) <i>S.cerevisiae</i> EBY100 with BAP+Bira though galactose induction for 32h.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    Meanwhile, we would like to  quanty the expression of biotin compared with EBY100 with plate reader and wonder when biotin can reach the maximum expression.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    <img src=""/>
+
    <br/>Figure 3.8 Expression level of biotin in different time compared with negative controll.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    And after Xh, the expression level of biotin achieved the highest amount.
+
    </p>
+
   
+
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Co-cultivation verification</strong></h3>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    We aimed to build an adhesion platform of <i>E. coli</i> and <i>S.cerevisiae</i>. Therefore, first we need to select a culture condition under which the heterogeneous cells can both grow happily. Taking into account the expression of the BAP in <i>S.cerevisiae</i>, galactose is required to induce protein expression. And to avoid diauxic growth of yeast when changing a new carbon source in the medium, we ultimaytely selected the YNB-CAA galactose medium. In order for the optimize expression of INP-MSA fusion protein, the in-ducing expression of BAP, and the growth rate of two heterogeneous cells, we took 28 ℃ as the culture temperature.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    We characterized the growth curve of <i>E. coli</i> with JIM target gene and that of <i>S.cerevisiae</i> containing BirA & Bap under the mentioned culture condition. And the dry group wonder some parameters of the growth of <i>E.coli</i> and <i>S.cerevisiae</i>, as well as the consumption of galactose.
+
     </p>
+
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/33/T--OUC-China--pro2-9-1.png" width="450px"/><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/93/T--OUC-China--pro2-9-2.png" width="450px"/>
+
    <br/>Figure 3.9 (left) The growth curve of E.coli with JIM; (right) the growth curve of S.cerevisiae containing BirA & Bap.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    From the image we can tell, when the yeast and <i>E.coli</i> grows at 28 ℃, the culture time needs to be longer than 48h in order to make the yeast take a dominant proportion. We adjust the YNB-CAA galactose medium containing <i>S.cerevisiae</i>  initial OD600 to 1.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    Meanwhile, we used HLPC to measure the consumption of galactose.
+
     </p>
+
   
+
    <h3 style="color: #66BCC7"><strong>Linkage validation</strong></h3>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    In order to illustrate that in practice, the co-culture of <i>S.cerevisiae</i> and <i>E.coli</i> can truly form the collaborating platform of heterologous cells, we will cultivate the two strains together by adding <i>E.coli</i> to the galactose-induced yeast. The co-cultured samples will then be dyed with rhodamine-biotin and FITC-streptavidin.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    As is shown below, we can see that there are quite a few areas of overlapping red and green fluorescent in positive group where there are both <i>S.cerevisiae</i> and <i>E.coli</i> in the sample, indicating that they are very likely to have linked to each other. The negative control of <i>S.cerevisiae</i> and <i>E.coli</i> however, has either red or green fluorescent. And for the empty group, there is no fluorescent detected at all.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5d/T--OUC-China--pro2-10.jpg"/>
+
    <br/>Figure 3.10 The co-cultured samples will then be dyed with rhodamine-biotin and FITC-streptavidin(tips: please maximize the intensity of your screen when looking at this picture)
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="font-size: 20px">
+
    Finally, we use the scanning tunneling microscope to shoot the microscopic structure of the connecting system and get a clearer picture of the connection structure. So far, we can say our adhesion platform is successfully established.
+
    </p>
+
    <p style="text-align: center;color: gray">
+
    <img src=""/>
+
    <br/>Figure 3.11 Observation of scanning tunneling microscope
+
    </p>
+
</div>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<!--此处是置顶及赞助页-->
 
<!--此处是置顶及赞助页-->

Latest revision as of 13:57, 18 November 2017

Demonstrate

Basic fermentation

Our basic fermentation part derives from our local environmental problem, the outbreak of Enteromorpha along the coastline in Qingdao, so it is natural that we would eventually go back to the origin and try to solve the real world problem after validation of design concept in the lab. We aim to make use of Enteromorpha residue, where there is no trehalose left because it is easiest to extract. Therefore, all we need to do is to deal with the cellulose and hemicellulose left in the residue.

We do treat our Enteromorpha powder with enzymes first and yeast later.(the Enteromorpha powder serves as the stimulation of Enteromorpha residue in real-world situation) The successful survival of the recombinant yeast strains that can use either xylose or cellubiose as the only carbon source can fully prove the feasibility of our designed pathway.

Along with the proof of our concept, we validate the upstream pathway from real algae powder, which has exactly the same constituent as Enteromorpha residue, and we can say that our idea can apply to real-world problems!

Enteromorpha pretreatment

We treat the Enteromorpha powder (residue) with 0.2% H2O2 to remove the lignin then cellulase and xylanase to produce xylose & cellubiose.


Figure 1.1 Enteromorpha Powder


Figure 1.2 Treat the residue with 0.2% H2O2.


Figure 1.3 Enzymatic hydrolysis solution of Enteromorpha fiber

Pretreatment validation

After that we detect the existence of xylose & cellubiose with HPLC. The peak appears at the same point, suggesting that they are the same substance. In other words, we successfully proved that the downstream product of Enteromorpha powder after pretreatment contains mainly xylose and cellubiose.


Figure 1.4 Result of standard cellubiose.


Figure 1.6 Result of standard xylose.


Figure 1.5 Result of our sample (the doublet indicate there is impurity in our sample).


Figure 1.7 Result of our sample (the smaller peak indicate there is impurity in our sample).

Yeast A that ferments xylose

After introducing the plasmid we constructed that contains gene XYL1,XYL2 into S.cerevisiae EBY100. We creat a xylose-utilize strain. We measured the growth rate of both our recombinant strain and negative control to prove the superiority of our new strain in xylose utilization.

We cultivate the EBY100(XDH-XR) and the EBY100(control) in SC adding 2% xylose as the sole carbon source, adjusting initial OD600 about 1.2,and placing in the shaking incubator of 30℃,180rpm to ferment.

The following result can well demonstrate that the strain that carries our plasmid grows much better than the strain that not (the stationary phase OD of EBY100(XDH-XR)is nearly 2 times that of WT EBY100)and reach the stationary phases after 40 hours’cultivation.


Figure 1.8 Growth curve of strains of our recombinant strain and negative control. Error bars represent standard deviation of four biological replicates, so do the other charts in this section.

For an immediate evidence, we need to know exactly how xylose content change in the medium. We use HPLC to detect the changing concentration of xylose, getting more data to support our idea that our cells can utilize the carbon sources as long as the concentration of xylose decrease with time.

The following chart shows the xylose content of both our recombinant strain and negative control. It is obvious that in our xylose-utilize strain, xylose content decrease (especially rapid in the first 40h) as time goes by while for the negative strain the xylose content stays steady, indicating the disability of using xylose.


Figure 1.9 Xylose content of both our recombinant strain and negative control.

In addition, to finally realize our design, the yeast need to ferment on xylose only. Therefore, we use the SBA-Biosensor to detect the ethanol content in the medium, which can convert the reaction of immobilized enzyme to electrochemical signal and help make a curve reflecting the ethanol change in the culture condition.

The following chart shows the ethanol content of both our recombinant strain and negative control.

Gladly, the curve of xylose-consuming strain goes gradually up along with cultivating hours, and reach the plateau at around 90 hours, which is consist with the xylose consuming curve, indicating that our strain do produce ethanol on the basis of xylose, thus realizes our design and proves the concept of basic fermentation part.


Figure 1.10 Ethanol content of both our recombinant strain and negative control.

In the same way, we conduct a series of experiment to confirm that our cellubiose-utilizing pathway also worked.

For the cellulose plasmid, we integrate cellubiose-degrading gene CDT and GH-1 into pYC230 by Gibson.


Fig 1.9 from lane 1 to 7 respectively:pYC230-GH1-CDT1 single enzyme digestion; pYC230-XYL1-XYL2 single enzyme digestion;marker; pYC230-GH1-CDT1 circular plasmid;pYC230-XYL1-XYL2 circular plasmid; marker

We introduce the plasmid into S.cerevisiae EBY100 and construct the cellubiose-utilize strain successfully and then test the growth rate of both our recombinant strain and negative control.

We cultivate the EBY100(CDT-GH1) and the EBY100(control) in SC adding 2% cellubiose as the sole carbon source, adjusting initial OD600 about 1,and placing in the shaking incubator of 30℃,180rpm to ferment.

Using HPLC we detect the changing concentration of cellubiose. The result shows that the concentration of cellubiose decrease with time, indicating a well utilization of cellubiose.

The following chart shows of both our recombinant strain (left) and negative control (right).

To examine the production of ethanol, we use the SBA-Biosensor, the same as in the xylose pathway.

The following chart shows the cellubiose content, ethanol content, and growth rate of both our cellubiose recombinant strain (left) and negative control (right).


Figure 1.12 Concentration of cellobiose,ethanol as well as OD600 of biomass change in 140h for cellobiose-recombinant strain


Figure 1.13 Concentration of cellobiose,ethanol as well as OD600 of biomass change in 140h for negative control

We acquired similar trend of those curves except one, the ethanol content, which dropped from around 70 hours. Considering the difference between monosaccharide and disaccharide, we suppose that the accumulation of the glucose when making use of cellubiose might be the reason lying beneath. Therefore, we detect the glucose content of the medium after that to validate our assumption.


Figure 1.14 The glucose concentration change in 140h for recombinant EBY100(CDT-1-GH-1) and WT EBY100


Figure 1.15 The ethanol concentration change in 140h for recombinant EBY100(CDT-1-GH-1) and WT EBY100

The result shows that glucose content in the medium reach a peak at about 40 hours and then decrease rapidly, which is consist with our expectation that the glucose in yeast was transformed gradually into acetic acid. Ethanol might then participate in further metabolic procedure with acetic acid thus was turned into ethyl acetate when glucose accumulates to a particular concentration.

Despite that, we can tell from the distinct difference between cellubiose-consuming strain and negative control that our approach of using yeast to transform Enteromorpha residue into ethanol finally worked!

We successfully confirmed in lab through simulation that our idea has been turn into real-world practice!

See more details in our proof page





MINI-GRE

Circuit construction

To explore the feasibility of MINI-GRE(genetic regulatory elements) by combination of promoters and terminators as we mentioned above, we designed four promoter-terminator pairs, and constructed four different report circuits for them (fig. A)

For circuit 1, we pair promoter CYC1 with terminator CYC1, which are among the most commonly used native promoters and terminators and also have a relative medium strength in yeast.[4] For circuit 2, promoter CYC1 is paired with terminator MINI. The MINIp-CYC1t and MINIp-MINIt, respectively, serves as the chosen pair for circuit 3 and 4.

For convenience, we named the“CYC1p-yECitrine-CYC1t-mStrawberry-CYC1t”as“CC”,“CYC1p-yECitrine-MINIt-mStrawberry-CYC1t”as“CM”,“MINIp-yECitrine-CYC1t-mStrawberry-CYC1t”as“MC”, and“MINIp-yECitrine-MINIt-mStrawberry-CYC1t” as “MM”,hereafter.

Fig. A the plasmid map of our circuit CC, CM, MC, MM. The CC circuit includes the commonly used native promoter CYC1 and terminator CYC1. The MM circuit includes the combination of MINI promoter and MINI terminator.

Results

For each circuit, the strength of promoters was characterized by yECitrine, a kind of yellow fluorescent protein was used to detect the output level of particular promoter, terminator or promoter-terminator pair. And the red fluorescent signal from RFP mStrawberry can represent the relative read-through efficiency of particular terminator in the circuits including the same promoter.

While monitoring the growth rate of four strains containing different expression regulatory devices, we also characterized the expression strength of the promoter-terminator pairs by detecting the fluorescence intensity of yECitrine in each circuit. As we can see in the bar chart, the ratio and relationship of the signals from 4 circuits become relatively stable at the early stationary phase, which hints that the expression level may reach the dynamic steady state at the time point 22 hours. And the results from 22 hours point also match the strength relationship of the two promoters in previous research, although we used another yeast strain here. [2, 5] Therefore, comparing with the mid-log phase data, we tend to believe that this results can reflect the true dynamic characteristics of the genetic regulatory devices, although we will research this phenomenon in our future work.(Fig. D)

So, in order to better reflect the dynamic behaviors of the circuits we tend to use data from mid-log phase during the growth process.

Fig. B The growth curve of the four strains with different promoter- terminator pairs. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.


Fig. C The fluorescence/Abs600 in different time. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.


Fig.D The fluorescence/Abs600 of strains with different promoter-terminator pairs, after being cultivating for 22 hours. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.

Function Verification of promoters and terminators

Through comparing “CC” with “CM”, we can learn that the Fluorescence/Abs600 of “CM”is nearly three times of “CC”, proving that the strength of MINI terminator is higher than that of CYC1 terminator. (Fig. D)(At first we think of measuring this characteristic by comparing yECitrine fluorescence /mStrawberry fluorescence. However, considering that the fluorescence of mStrawberry is too low, we cannot expect an accurate result due to the high error rate. ) We assume that both MINI terminators and CYC1 terminators can effectively stop the transcription, so the mRNA of mStrawberry generated behind these terminators can hardly be detected, neither does the fluorescence of mStrawberry.

What’s more, the Fluorescence/Abs600 of “MM”is also nearly 3-fold compared with “MC”, proving that the strength of MINI promoter is higher than CYC1 promoter.

In addition, when we compared “MM” with “CC” which is the commonly used promoter-terminator pair, we found that the difference is nearly 6-fold. (Fig. D)

From our results, we confirmed that the MINI promoter and MINI terminator do be superior to CYC1 promoter and CYC1 terminator, not only in length but also in strength. (Fig. E)


Fig. E Length and output level of 4 different promoter–terminator combination. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates

Robustness in different host

In order to verify that the MINI-GRE is able to work with the same rule in a variety of yeast strains and expend the application range of these MINI regulatory devices, we invited other teams to repeat the same experiments in different yeast strains and experimental environment, which can also be an important part of our collaboration.

The time point of the data collection is early stationary phase of yeast growth. The yeast strains we used with Nanjing-China were Saccharomyces cerevisiae EBY100. The yeast strain used in Tianjin was synX, the yeast strain with chemical synthetic chromosome.

From the result of other colleges, we can know that our MINI-GRE can also work in other yeast strains. (Fig. F)


Fig. F The fluorescence/Abs600 of strains with different promoter-terminator pairs in the late from three teams, OUC-China, Tianjin and Nanjing-China(left to right). Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.

Transcription Level Assay by qPCR

Moreover, we run qPCR towards corresponding protein in order for a further validation of different promoter-terminator combination’s expression on a post-transcriptional level.

The result from qPCR assay shows that at the 22nd hour from setting up culture, the circuits reached the highest expression intensity and the expression level of four circuits is shown below.


Fig. G The relative transcription level of yECitrine and mStrawberry at the 22nd hour from setting up culture. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates.

However, the transcript level of yECitrine doesn’t matched the fluorescence very well. We infer that it may be caused by the experimental error of the total mRNA concentration and the little mismatch of the primers.

Luckily, we can still learn that the transcript level of mStrawberry is very low, which means the transcriptional read through of both CYC1t and MINI terminator can be overlooked; they can efficiently terminate the transcription, which confirmed the assumption before.

Conclusion

To draw a conclusion, from our experiments, we confirmed the superiority of the MINI-GRE (MINI promoter-MINI terminator pair), which can be summed into three aspects:

(1) Short but strong, which decreases the possibility of undesired homologous reorganization and provide significant output strength compared with commonly used promoter-terminator pair.

(2) Versatile,which can work in different yeast strains and provide robust function for extensive application.

(3) Well-modularited, has good modularity because of the low transcriptional read through efficiency from minimal terminator, which is an important characteristic in synthetic biology.


See more details in our proof page



Contact Us : oucigem@163.com  |  ©2017 OUC IGEM.All Rights Reserved.  |  Based On Bootstrap