Difference between revisions of "Team:UIUC Illinois"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="UIUCIllinoisStyle2.css" /> | <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="UIUCIllinoisStyle2.css" /> | ||
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.5/css/bootstrap.min.css"> | <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.5/css/bootstrap.min.css"> | ||
| − | <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Cabin+Sketch| | + | <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/font-awesome/4.7.0/css/font-awesome.min.css"> |
| + | <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family= Cabin+Sketch | Josefin+Sans | Ubuntu" rel="stylesheet"> | ||
<!--JS for back to top button--> | <!--JS for back to top button--> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
if (document.body.scrollTop > 1000 || document.documentElement.scrollTop > 20) { | if (document.body.scrollTop > 1000 || document.documentElement.scrollTop > 20) { | ||
document.getElementById("myBtn").style.display = "block"; | document.getElementById("myBtn").style.display = "block"; | ||
| − | } else { to | + | } else { |
| + | to | ||
document.getElementById("myBtn").style.display = "none"; | document.getElementById("myBtn").style.display = "none"; | ||
} | } | ||
| Line 50: | Line 52: | ||
<!--=================Back to the top button=================--> | <!--=================Back to the top button=================--> | ||
| − | <button onclick="topFunction()" class="topButton" id="myBtn" title="Go to top"> | + | <button onclick="topFunction()" class="topButton" id="myBtn" title="Go to top"><i class="fa fa-angle-double-up" style="font-size: 30px;"></i></button> |
</head> | </head> | ||
| Line 66: | Line 68: | ||
</aside> | </aside> | ||
| − | + | <div id="fh5co-work-section" class="fh5co-light-grey-section"> | |
| − | + | <div class="row"> | |
| − | + | <div class="container"> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | <div class="text-center" style="padding-left: 3em; height: 200px; color:black"> | |
| − | + | <h1 class="section-heading" style="font-family: 'Ubuntu', sans-serif; font-weight:bolder; font-size: 58px; color: rgb(61, 209, 223);">A More Affordable Gibson Assembly!</h1> | |
| − | + | </div> | |
| − | + | <div class="dna"> | |
| − | + | <div class="ele"></div> | |
| − | + | <div class="ele"></div> | |
| − | + | <div class="ele"></div> | |
| − | + | <div class="ele"></div> | |
| − | + | <div class="ele"></div> | |
| − | + | <div class="ele"></div> | |
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | <div class="ele"></div> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <br><br><br> | ||
| + | <hr style="border: 1px solid rgb(254, 167, 0);"> | ||
| − | |||
| + | <div id="start" class="col-md-10 col-md-offset-1 text-center fh5co-heading animate-box"> | ||
| + | <h1 id="homeH">What is<em> </em>Gibson Assembly?</h1> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | <p id="homeP"> | ||
| + | Gibson assembly is a useful molecular cloning technique published in 2009 by Dr. Daniel Gibson and his colleagues. This technique allows for the possibility of assembling up to 15 different DNA fragments in a single in vitro reaction, which | ||
| + | allows for more efficient use of time and resources when compared with conventional cloning techniques. Despite its efficient process, some still deem Gibson Assembly and its preparation require considerable cost. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| − | + | <div id="start" class="col-md-10 col-md-offset-1 text-center fh5co-heading animate-box"> | |
| − | + | <h1 id="homeH">What are we<em> </em>aiming to do?</h1> | |
| − | + | <br> | |
| − | + | <p id="homeP"> | |
| − | + | <i>Escherichia coli</i> is a model organism that has been developed into a useful tool for researchers to express genes of interest due to their ease of genetic manipulation and high replication rate. We believe that we can use engineered | |
| + | E. coli to overcome the high cost of using Gibson assembly method. Theoretically, two of the three genes required to encode for the proteins required in Gibson Assembly could be inserted into a duet vector plasmid and the third into a single plasmid | ||
| + | vector to be transformed into E. coli. These E. coli strains harboring the Gibson Assembly machinery will then naturally replicate and the plasmids that contain the genes for the 5'-exonuclease, DNA polymerase, and DNA ligase will be expressed. | ||
| + | Afterwards, cell lysate can be mixed with a plasmid backbone and DNA fragments of interest. In theory, this should produce the same combination effect as the traditional Gibson assembly method. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| − | + | <div id="start" class="col-md-10 col-md-offset-1 text-center fh5co-heading animate-box"> | |
| − | + | <h1 id="homeH">What makes our<em> </em>idea significant?</h1> | |
| − | + | <br> | |
| − | + | <p id="homeP"> | |
| − | + | Estimates for the current cost of running a Gibson assembly method is $185 for ten reactions. The method we are developing will be significantly cheaper than the method now, as we will only need the cost of making an LB media (which ranges | |
| − | + | from $0.03 to $0.30 depending on the method of acquiring the LB media). | |
| − | </ | + | </p> |
| + | </div> | ||
| − | + | </div> | |
| − | + | </div> | |
| − | + | </div> | |
| − | + | <br><br> | |
<footer id="fh5co-footer" role="contentinfo"> | <footer id="fh5co-footer" role="contentinfo"> | ||
<div class="containers"> | <div class="containers"> | ||
| − | <div class="col-md-12 | + | <div class="col-md-12 text-center"> |
<ul class="fh5co-social"> | <ul class="fh5co-social"> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 2 August 2017
A More Affordable Gibson Assembly!
What is Gibson Assembly?
Gibson assembly is a useful molecular cloning technique published in 2009 by Dr. Daniel Gibson and his colleagues. This technique allows for the possibility of assembling up to 15 different DNA fragments in a single in vitro reaction, which allows for more efficient use of time and resources when compared with conventional cloning techniques. Despite its efficient process, some still deem Gibson Assembly and its preparation require considerable cost.
What are we aiming to do?
Escherichia coli is a model organism that has been developed into a useful tool for researchers to express genes of interest due to their ease of genetic manipulation and high replication rate. We believe that we can use engineered E. coli to overcome the high cost of using Gibson assembly method. Theoretically, two of the three genes required to encode for the proteins required in Gibson Assembly could be inserted into a duet vector plasmid and the third into a single plasmid vector to be transformed into E. coli. These E. coli strains harboring the Gibson Assembly machinery will then naturally replicate and the plasmids that contain the genes for the 5'-exonuclease, DNA polymerase, and DNA ligase will be expressed. Afterwards, cell lysate can be mixed with a plasmid backbone and DNA fragments of interest. In theory, this should produce the same combination effect as the traditional Gibson assembly method.
What makes our idea significant?
Estimates for the current cost of running a Gibson assembly method is $185 for ten reactions. The method we are developing will be significantly cheaper than the method now, as we will only need the cost of making an LB media (which ranges from $0.03 to $0.30 depending on the method of acquiring the LB media).
