Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/translational system/library and selection"
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <articel> | ||
+ | We decided to create a tRNA/aaRS library in two different ways, showing the advantages and disadvantages of both methods. | ||
+ | The first method is based on primers, which contain a randomization in a certain position. Both forward and reverse primer own this randomization. When the library plasmid is amplified with these primers it results in plasmids containing a variety of different amino acids in this certain position. While the execution of this method is easy, the diversity of plasmid sequences is not large. That is because of the statistical loss of different versions due to the required binding of two complementary primers on the same DNA fragment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </article> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="figure large"> | ||
+ | <img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0b/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--NNK_PCR.png"> | ||
+ | <p class="figure subtitle"><b>Figure 2: Creation of a library</b><br> Creation of a library using a randomized primers and PCR (Polymerase Chaine Reaction).</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 07:58, 11 October 2017
Library and Selection
Generating the library
Figure 1: Library plasmid pSB1C3 containing the tyrosyl tRNA synthetase.
Figure 2: Creation of a library
Creation of a library using a randomized primers and PCR (Polymerase Chaine Reaction).