MarkusHaak (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="contentbox"> | ||
+ | <div class="bevel tr"></div> | ||
+ | <div class="content"> | ||
+ | <h2>Characterisation of the fluorescent amino acid <a href="https://2017.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/toolbox/labeling#CouAA">L‑(7‑hydroxycoumarin‑4‑yl) ethylglycin (CouAA)</a></h2> | ||
+ | <article> | ||
+ | To find out if L‑(7‑hydroxycoumarin‑4‑yl) ethylglycin (CouAA) is suitable for cultivation and expression experiments we wanted to performe experiments on the stability and fluorescence ability on ourself. At first the absorbance of LB media containing 1 mM was measured at the beginning and after 24 hours incubation at 37 °C. It turns out that the absorbance maximum is at 328 nm. After that we recorded a fluorescence spectra of the sample with constant irradiation at 328 nm. The fluorescence maximum was measured at 452 nm, both spectra are shown in figure 1. The absorbance and fluorescence spectra are very similar to the spectra published by Wang 2006. The small variances in the absorbance are probably caused by diffrent absorption of the used media. After inorporation in the protein we recorded the absobance and fluorescence spectra of CouAA in the protein to, the spectra are shown in figure 3. | ||
+ | </article> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="figure large"> | ||
+ | <img class="figure image" src="https://2017.igem.org/File:T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--SVI-Analysing-results_CouAAspectra.png.png"> | ||
+ | <p class="figure subtitle"><b>Figure 1:</b> Absorbance and fluorescence spectra of CouAA, recorded by UV/VIS-sprectralphotometer. The fluorescece spectra was recorded at the absorbance maximum at 328 nm.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="bevel bl"></div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<div class="contentbox"> | <div class="contentbox"> | ||
Line 36: | Line 52: | ||
For the construction of the synthetase, we decided to use the Tyrosine tRNA/aminoacyl-synthetase from <i>Methanococcus jannaschii</i> with mutations at the following eight positions: Tyr32Glu, Leu65His, Ala67Gly, His70Gly, Phe108Tyr, Gln109His, Asp158Gly, and Leu162Gly, as described by Wang, 2006. We ordered the synthetase as gene synthesis and incorporated it via Gibson assembly in pSB1C3. For the experiments, the CDS for the synthetase needs to be on a low copy plasmid. Therefor we choose to insert it into pSB3C5 with a bio brick assembly. <br> | For the construction of the synthetase, we decided to use the Tyrosine tRNA/aminoacyl-synthetase from <i>Methanococcus jannaschii</i> with mutations at the following eight positions: Tyr32Glu, Leu65His, Ala67Gly, His70Gly, Phe108Tyr, Gln109His, Asp158Gly, and Leu162Gly, as described by Wang, 2006. We ordered the synthetase as gene synthesis and incorporated it via Gibson assembly in pSB1C3. For the experiments, the CDS for the synthetase needs to be on a low copy plasmid. Therefor we choose to insert it into pSB3C5 with a bio brick assembly. <br> | ||
− | To test whether the synthetase really incorporates CouAA, we transformed the synthetase in pSB3C5 and our composite part BBa_ K2201331 as test protein in <i>E. coli</i> BL21 DE3. The part K2201231 contains the CDS for the protein Sup35 with an amber stop codon at position 21 under control of a T7-promoter. If the synthetase works, it will incorporate CouAA in response to the amber codon at position 21. However, we expressed the test protein, which contains a histidine tag, and purified it through NiNTA chromatography. The purified proteins were digested with trypsin and analyzed through MALDI TOF/TOF. | + | To test whether the synthetase really incorporates CouAA, we transformed the synthetase in pSB3C5 and our composite part BBa_ K2201331 as test protein in <i>E. coli</i> BL21 DE3. The part K2201231 contains the CDS for the protein Sup35 with an amber stop codon at position 21 under control of a T7-promoter. If the synthetase works, it will incorporate CouAA in response to the amber codon at position 21. However, we expressed the test protein, which contains a histidine tag, and purified it through NiNTA chromatography. The purified proteins were analysed via UV/VIS-spectralphotometer, analysed on SDS-PAGE and digested with trypsin and analyzed through MALDI TOF/TOF. |
</article> | </article> | ||
Revision as of 14:55, 14 October 2017
Labeling
Short summary
To demonstrate the advantages of this tool, we want to colocalize the ribulose 1,5‑bisphosphat carboxylase oxygenase (RuBisCo) from Halobacillus neaplitanus and the carboxysome in E. coli cells. The carboxysome is labeled with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and the RuBisCo should be labeled with the fluorescent amino acid at different positions and with the red fluorescent protein (RFP) to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both labeling strategies.
Characterisation of the fluorescent amino acid L‑(7‑hydroxycoumarin‑4‑yl) ethylglycin (CouAA)
Figure 1: Absorbance and fluorescence spectra of CouAA, recorded by UV/VIS-sprectralphotometer. The fluorescece spectra was recorded at the absorbance maximum at 328 nm.
Evolved Tyrosine tRNA/aminoacyl-synthetase (TyrRS) for the incorporation of 7-hydroxy-L-coumaryl-ethylglycin (CouAA)
To test whether the synthetase really incorporates CouAA, we transformed the synthetase in pSB3C5 and our composite part BBa_ K2201331 as test protein in E. coli BL21 DE3. The part K2201231 contains the CDS for the protein Sup35 with an amber stop codon at position 21 under control of a T7-promoter. If the synthetase works, it will incorporate CouAA in response to the amber codon at position 21. However, we expressed the test protein, which contains a histidine tag, and purified it through NiNTA chromatography. The purified proteins were analysed via UV/VIS-spectralphotometer, analysed on SDS-PAGE and digested with trypsin and analyzed through MALDI TOF/TOF.
Construction of RuBisCo mutants containing the amber stop codon
The permissive sites were detected by the alignment with Clustal Omega of different analogical RuBisCo from Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus, Thioalkalivibrio denitrificans, Thiothrix nivea, Thermothiobacillus tepidarius, Acidobacillus caldus and Acidiferrobacter thiooxydans. If amino acids at the same position are heterologous, the amino acid seems to be unimportant for the functioning and folding of the protein. These permissive sites of the enzyme are suitable for the incorporation of the noncanonical fluorescent amino acid.
Figure 1: Multiple amino acid sequence alignment of analogical small subunit RuBisCo variants from Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus(WP_012639733.1), Thioalkalivibrio denitrificans(WP_058575622.1), Thiothrix nivea(WP_012823800.1), Thermothiobacillus tepidarius(WP_066099403), Acidobacillus caldus(WP_002708379.1) and Acidiferrobacter thiooxydans(WP_045467882.1).
- -BBa_K2201261 with a TAG at amino acid position 2 of the small subunit
- -BBa_K2201262 with a TAG at amino acid position 111 of the small subunit
- -BBa_K2201263 with a TAG at amino acid position 474 of the large subunit
- -BBa_K2201264 with a TAG at amino acid position 2 and 111 of the small subunit
- -BBa_K2201265 with a TAG at amino acid position 2 of the small subunit and amino acid position 474 of the large subunit
- -BBa_K2201266 with a TAG at amino acid position 111 of the small subunit and amino acid position 474 of the large subunit
- -BBa_K2201267 with a TAG at amino acid position 2 and 111 of the small subunit and amino acid position 474 of the large subunit