Difference between revisions of "Team:UCSC/Community-Outreach"

Line 5: Line 5:
 
Was their work integrated into their project? (We want to see how projects have evolved based on Integrated HP work.)
 
Was their work integrated into their project? (We want to see how projects have evolved based on Integrated HP work.)
  
</h3> Education and Public Engagement<h3>
+
<h3> Education and Public Engagement</h3>
</h2>iGEM judging rubric below:</h2>
+
<h2>iGEM judging rubric below:</h2>
 
1. Did their work establish a dialogue? (The teams should show that a conversation was established, that they did not just “talk at” their audience.) </br>
 
1. Did their work establish a dialogue? (The teams should show that a conversation was established, that they did not just “talk at” their audience.) </br>
 
2. Does it serve as an inspiring example to other teams? </br>
 
2. Does it serve as an inspiring example to other teams? </br>

Revision as of 19:30, 20 September 2017

COMMUNITY OUTREACH Outline of contents: Integrated Human Practices: Was their work integrated into their project? (We want to see how projects have evolved based on Integrated HP work.)

Education and Public Engagement

iGEM judging rubric below:

1. Did their work establish a dialogue? (The teams should show that a conversation was established, that they did not just “talk at” their audience.) </br> 2. Does it serve as an inspiring example to other teams? </br> 3. Is it documented in a way that others can build upon? </br> 4. Was it thoughtfully implemented (i.e., did they explain the context, rationale, prior work)? </br>

Teams should be able to demonstrate that this dialogue was bi-directional, - teams should be able to demonstrate that they have learned from the interaction and/or that the opportunity for learning was built into the activity. Judges should focus on WHY the team has chosen their speci c activities, WHAT they have done and accomplished, and HOW they have learned from the activity.

Should include tabs for how HP informed aspects of the project. aka Human practices: Informing chassis choice....or something.