Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/unnatural base pair/uptake and biosynthesis"

Line 146: Line 146:
 
<thead>
 
<thead>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
−
<th style="width: 100%;" class="header">Strain</th>
+
<th style="width: 60%;" class="header">Strain</th>
−
<th style="width: 100%;" class="header">µ<sub>max</sub> [h<sup>-1</sup>]</th>
+
<th style="width: 20%;" class="header">µ<sub>max</sub> [h<sup>-1</sup>]</th>
−
<th style="width: 100%;" class="header">t<sub>d</sub> [h]</th>
+
<th style="width: 20%;" class="header">t<sub>d</sub> [h]</th>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</thead>
 
</thead>
Line 212: Line 212:
 
</article>
 
</article>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div class="contentbox">
 +
<div class="bevel tr"></div>
 +
<div class="content">
 +
<h3> Microcultivations of the Different <i>Pt</i>NTT2 Variants </h3>
 +
 +
<article>
 +
Due to the high price of unnatural nucleoside triphosphates, performing experiments such as cultivations in a small volume is desirable. Therefore, we validated whether cultivations in micro well plates can achieved the same results as cultivations performed in shake flasks and optimized the method [LINK]. The optimal conditions for cultivations in a small volume were determined as follows: 12 well plates with a cultivation volume of 1 mL, 37 °C and 600 rpm. To analyze the growth of the different<i>Pt</i>NTT2 variants in a micro cultivation, the shake flask cultivation was repeated in a 12 well plate. All cultures were inoculated with an OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.1. Three biological replicates of each strain were tested and three technical replicates were measured at each time point. The results are shown in figure X.
 +
 +
<div class="figure large">
 +
<img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/4d/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--microcultivation.jpeg">
 +
<p class="figure subtitle"><b>Figure (5): Microcultivation of all<i>Pt</i>NTT2 variants</b><br><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) and <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 (BBa_K2201004) were again used as negative controls. The same growth pattern as in the shake flask cultivation can be observed, with <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2, <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) reaching the highest ODs, followed by <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575), <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 and <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2.</p>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
The results of the micro cultivations show the same growth pattern observed in the shake flask cultivations. <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) and <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 reached the highest ODs with 5.487 ± 0.038 and 4.337 ± 0.01, respectively. <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 reached a final OD<sub>600</sub> of 4.110 ± 0.005, followed by <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) with a final OD<sub>600</sub> of 4.035 ± 0.051. <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575) reached the third highest OD<sub>600</sub> of all<i>Pt</i>NTT2 variants with a final OD<sub>600</sub> of 3.865 ± 0.008. The lowest final ODs were again reached by <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 and <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2, reaching a final OD<sub>600</sub> of 2.28 ± 0.337 and 1.623 ± 0.481. Therefore, we were able to demonstrate that the results of the shake flask cultivations can be transferred to a smaller format, such as a micro cultivation in 1 mL. The reproduction of the results in a 50 times smaller volume is important for further experiments.
 +
 +
 +
<p class="figure subtitle"><b>Table (3): Final OD<sub>600</sub> of all cultures.</b><br> The highest OD<sub>600</sub> was reached by the wildtype <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) with 5,487 ± 0.038, the lowest by <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 with 1.623 ± 0.481.</p>
 +
<table>
 +
<thead>
 +
<tr>
 +
<th style="width: 100%;" class="header">Strain</th>
 +
<th style="width: 100%;" class="header">Final OD<sub>600</sub> [-]</th>
 +
</tr>
 +
</thead>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) </td>
 +
<td>5.487 ± 0.038</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 </td>
 +
<td>4.337 ± 0.010</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 </td>
 +
<td>1.623 ± 0.481</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) </td>
 +
<td>4.035 ± 0.051</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575) </td>
 +
<td>3.865 ± 0.008</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 </td>
 +
<td>4.110 ± 0.005</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 </td>
 +
<td>2.280 ± 0.337</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
</table>
 +
<br>
 +
Like for the shake flask cultivation, µmax was determined graphically (figure 5). Bases on the obtained values, the minimum doubling time was calculated. The results are summarized in table (4).
 +
 +
<div class="figure large">
 +
<img class="figure image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e6/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--%C2%B5max_microcultivation.jpeg">
 +
<p class="figure subtitle"><b>Figure (5): Graphical determination of the maximum specific growth rate µmax for the microcultivations. </b><br> </p>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<p class="figure subtitle"><b>Table (4): Maximum specific growth rate and minimum doubling time for all cultures cultivated in 12 well plates.  </b><br> </p>
 +
<table>
 +
<thead>
 +
<tr>
 +
<th style="width: 60%;" class="header">Strain</th>
 +
<th style="width: 20%;" class="header">µ<sub>max</sub> [h<sup>-1</sup>]</th>
 +
<th style="width: 20%;" class="header">t<sub>d</sub> [h]</th>
 +
</tr>
 +
</thead>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) </td>
 +
<td>1.059 ± 0.143</td>
 +
<td>0.655 ± 0.135</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 </td>
 +
<td>1.016 ± 0.133</td>
 +
<td>0.682 ± 0.131</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 </td>
 +
<td>0.829 ± 0.071</td>
 +
<td>0.836 ± 0.086</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) </td>
 +
<td>1.023 ± 0.105</td>
 +
<td>0.678 ± 0.103</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575) </td>
 +
<td>1.021 ± 0.096</td>
 +
<td>0.679 ± 0.094</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 </td>
 +
<td>1.047 ± 0.097</td>
 +
<td>0.662 ± 0.093</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
<tbody>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><i><i>E.&nbsp;coli</i></i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 </td>
 +
<td>0.924 ± 0.113</td>
 +
<td>0.750 ± 0.122</td>
 +
<td align="right"></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</tbody>
 +
</table>
 +
<br>
 +
All cultures show extended doubling times when compared to the shake flask cultivations. This is not surprising, since the oxygen transfer is much better in shake flasks compared to well plates. Nonetheless, similar final OD<sub>600</sub> values were reached in the micro cultivations. Furthermore, the same differences in growth between the different strains can be observed, with <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 and <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 growing the weakest.
 +
 +
</article>
 +
 +
</div>
 +
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Revision as of 16:30, 28 October 2017

Uptake and Biosynthesis

Computational Analysis of PtNTT2

Zhang et al. used an N-terminal truncated version of PtNTT2, lacking the first 65 amino acids, since they observed some kind of toxicity resulting from the native N-terminal sequence (Zhang et al., 2017). For our project, we analyzed the amino acid sequence of PtNTT2 using the prediction software Phobius (Käll et al., 2007). Using Phobius, we analyzed the signal peptide and the transmembrane topology of PtNTT2. The analysis revealed that the native signal peptide is formed by amino acids 1 30, which means that Zhang et al. removed more than the native signal peptide for their experiment. The results of the prediction are shown in Figure X. Analysis of the transmembrane topology of the transporter, which is integrated into the plastid membrane in its native algal cell, shows iterative non-cytoplasmatic, transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions. The topology might indicate, that the transporter will be integrated into the inner membrane when expressed in E. coli.

Figure (1): Results of the analysis of PtNTT2 using Phobius.
The 30 first amino acids are clearly recognized as a signal peptide. Ten transmembrane domains are predicted.

Plasmid Design

For the analysis and characterization of PtNTT2, a total of eleven plasmids were designed and cloned based on initial research and the computational analysis. The coding sequence of PtNTT2 was codon optimized using the IDT Codon Optimization Tool [REF] and ordered as two gBlocks. Using overlap extension PCR, the two gBlocks were put together and inserted into pSB1C3 using Gibson Assembly. The truncated versions of the transporter as well as the versions with new signal peptides were constructed using primers and Gibson assembly. Based on BBa_B0034 and BBa_K2082221 the fusion proteins were designed and cloned. A schematic overview of the design of the different plasmids is shown in Figure 2. All plasmids except pSB1C3-PtNTT2 were tagged with the same cMyc-GFP construct for imaging and western blots.

Figure (2): Schematic overview of the design of the different transporter variants.
The lacUV5 promotor was used together with a strong RBS (BBa_B0034) for all parts. All variants except for pSB1C3-PtNTT2 were also tagged with GFP (BBa_E0040). cMyc was used as a linker (based on BBa_K2082221).

Cultivations of the Different PtNTT2 Variants

Given that Zhang et al., 2017 reported some kind of toxicity resulting from the N-terminal sequence of PtNTT2, we first investigated if we could also observe the same toxicity associated with the N-terminal sequence. We also tested whether our own versions of the transporter result in better growth and reduced toxicity compared to the native transporter. Therefore, after cloning the plasmids in E. coli DH5α and verifying the correct assembly via sequencing, all plasmids were transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). The presence of the correct plasmids was again verified by colony PCR. The first cultivations were carried out in shake flasks in LB media. A total cultivation volume of 50 mL was used. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C and 180 rpm. All cultures were inoculated with an OD600 of 0.01. OD600 was measured every hour during lag and stationary phase and every 30 minutes during the exponential phase. The optical density was measured using an Eppendorf Photometer and standard cuvettes. E. coli BL21(DE3) without a plasmid and E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring pSB1C3-PtNTT2 were used as negative controls. Two biological replicates of each strain were tested and three technical replicates were measured for each timepoint.

Figure (3): Shake flask cultivation of all PtNTT2 variants.
E. coli BL21(DE3) and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2, not expressing PtNTT2, were used as negative controls. Two biological replicates of each strain were cultivated and three technical replicates taken for each measurement. A clear difference in the growth rates can be observed, with E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 showing the weakest growth. Both strains also show the longest lag phase, which is nearly twice as long as the lag phase of E. coli BL21(DE3). E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 show the best growth of all PtNTT2 variants, reaching the highest OD600.

E. coli BL21(DE3) without any plasmid shows the best growth, with the highest specific growth rate and the highest final OD600 of 5.178 ± 0.046. The second negative control, E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring pSB1C3-PtNTT2 (BBa_K2201004) reached the second highest OD600 with 4.638 ± 0.029. Of the functionalPtNTT2 variants, strains harboring pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) (BBa_K2201001) and pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 (BBa_K2201006) reached the highest ODs with 4.397 ± 0.062 and 4.171 ± 0.051, respectively. E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575) (BBa_K2201005) showed similar growth to the two previous strains during the lag phase and early exponential phase, but reaching a lower OD600 of 3.802 ± 0.135. E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 (BBa_K2201000) and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 (BBa_K2201007) grew significantly weaker compared to all previous strains, with a lag phase nearly four hours long and final ODs of 2.499 ± 0.134 and 2.735 ± 0.150, respectively. The difference in growth between the two negative controls can be explained by the metabolic burden caused by plasmid replication and expression of the chloramphenicol resistance. Therefore, E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 is the more accurate control, since all samples contain the same plasmid backbone and were also grown in LB media supplemented with chloramphenicol. The difference in growth between strains expressing the native, full length transporter and the truncated versionPtNTT2(66-575), observed by Zhang et al. 2017, could also be shown. This negative effect might be associated with the native signal peptide ofPtNTT2, which E. coli might not be able to process correctly. Another explanation for the weak growth could be that the native transporter variant has a higher activity compared to the other variants. If the activity is too high, this might lead to a toxic effect and to the observed weak growth.

Table (1): Final OD600 of all cultures.
The highest OD600 was reached by the wildtype E. coli BL21(DE3), the lowest by E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2.

Strain Final OD600 [-]
E. coli BL21(DE3) 5.178 ± 0.046
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 4.638 ± 0.029
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 2.499 ± 0.134
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) 4.397 ± 0.062
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575) 3.802 ± 0.135
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 4.171 ± 0.051
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 2.735 ± 0.150

To determine the maximum specific growth rate (µmax), the natural logarithm of the OD600 values was plotted against the cultivation time. The slope of the linear regression through the exponential phase gives µmax. The graphical determination of µmax for the shake flask cultivation is shown in figure 4.

Figure (4): Graphical determination of µmax.
The highest specific growth rate was determined for each culture by plotting the natural logarithm of OD600 against the cultivation time. The slope of the linear regression through the exponential phase gives µmax.

Unsurprisingly, the highest specific growth rate can be observed for the negative controls E. coli BL21(DE3) and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 with values of 1.201 ± 0.070 h-1 and 1.212 ± 0.029 h-1, respectively. The lowest specific growth rate could be observed for E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 with a value of 0.946 ± 0.030 h-1. Based on the specific growth rate, the minimal doubling time was calculated using the following equation:


The maximum specific growth rates and minimal doubling times are show in table (2) for all cultures.

Table (2): Maximum specific growth rates and minimum doubling times for all cultures.

Strain µmax [h-1] td [h]
E. coli BL21(DE3) 1.201 ± 0.070 0.577 ± 0.058
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 1.212 ± 0.029 0.572 ± 0.024
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 0.978 ± 0.033 0.709 ± 0.034
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) 1.194 ± 0.026 0.581 ± 0.022
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575) 1.143 ± 0.045 0.606 ± 0.039
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 1.189 ± 0.028 0.583 ± 0.024
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 0.946 ± 0.030 0.733 ± 0.032

These results clearly show that expression ofPtNTT2 leads to a reduced final cell density and slower growth. Furthermore, the different variants ofPtNTT2 differ highly, indicating that some variants ofPtNTT2 negatively affect the growth rate and final cell density.

Microcultivations of the Different PtNTT2 Variants

Due to the high price of unnatural nucleoside triphosphates, performing experiments such as cultivations in a small volume is desirable. Therefore, we validated whether cultivations in micro well plates can achieved the same results as cultivations performed in shake flasks and optimized the method [LINK]. The optimal conditions for cultivations in a small volume were determined as follows: 12 well plates with a cultivation volume of 1 mL, 37 °C and 600 rpm. To analyze the growth of the differentPtNTT2 variants in a micro cultivation, the shake flask cultivation was repeated in a 12 well plate. All cultures were inoculated with an OD600 of 0.1. Three biological replicates of each strain were tested and three technical replicates were measured at each time point. The results are shown in figure X.

Figure (5): Microcultivation of allPtNTT2 variants
E. coli BL21(DE3) and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 (BBa_K2201004) were again used as negative controls. The same growth pattern as in the shake flask cultivation can be observed, with E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2, E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) reaching the highest ODs, followed by E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575), E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2.

The results of the micro cultivations show the same growth pattern observed in the shake flask cultivations. E. coli BL21(DE3) and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 reached the highest ODs with 5.487 ± 0.038 and 4.337 ± 0.01, respectively. E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 reached a final OD600 of 4.110 ± 0.005, followed by E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) with a final OD600 of 4.035 ± 0.051. E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575) reached the third highest OD600 of allPtNTT2 variants with a final OD600 of 3.865 ± 0.008. The lowest final ODs were again reached by E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2, reaching a final OD600 of 2.28 ± 0.337 and 1.623 ± 0.481. Therefore, we were able to demonstrate that the results of the shake flask cultivations can be transferred to a smaller format, such as a micro cultivation in 1 mL. The reproduction of the results in a 50 times smaller volume is important for further experiments.

Table (3): Final OD600 of all cultures.
The highest OD600 was reached by the wildtype E. coli BL21(DE3) with 5,487 ± 0.038, the lowest by E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 with 1.623 ± 0.481.

Strain Final OD600 [-]
E. coli BL21(DE3) 5.487 ± 0.038
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 4.337 ± 0.010
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 1.623 ± 0.481
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) 4.035 ± 0.051
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575) 3.865 ± 0.008
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 4.110 ± 0.005
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 2.280 ± 0.337

Like for the shake flask cultivation, µmax was determined graphically (figure 5). Bases on the obtained values, the minimum doubling time was calculated. The results are summarized in table (4).

Figure (5): Graphical determination of the maximum specific growth rate µmax for the microcultivations.

Table (4): Maximum specific growth rate and minimum doubling time for all cultures cultivated in 12 well plates.

Strain µmax [h-1] td [h]
E. coli BL21(DE3) 1.059 ± 0.143 0.655 ± 0.135
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PtNTT2 1.016 ± 0.133 0.682 ± 0.131
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 0.829 ± 0.071 0.836 ± 0.086
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(66-575) 1.023 ± 0.105 0.678 ± 0.103
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2(31-575) 1.021 ± 0.096 0.679 ± 0.094
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-pelB-SP-PtNTT2 1.047 ± 0.097 0.662 ± 0.093
E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 0.924 ± 0.113 0.750 ± 0.122

All cultures show extended doubling times when compared to the shake flask cultivations. This is not surprising, since the oxygen transfer is much better in shake flasks compared to well plates. Nonetheless, similar final OD600 values were reached in the micro cultivations. Furthermore, the same differences in growth between the different strains can be observed, with E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-PtNTT2 and E. coli BL21(DE3) pSB1C3-PlacUV5-TAT-SP-PtNTT2 growing the weakest.