Difference between revisions of "Team:Arizona State/Improve"

For teams seeking to improve upon a previous part or project, you should document all of your work on this page. Please remember to include all part measurement and characterization data on the part page on the Regisrty. Please include a link to your improved part on this page.

Gold Medal Criterion #2

Standard Tracks: Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part. The original part must NOT be from your 2017 part number range. If you change the original part sequence, you must submit a new part. In addition, both the new and original part pages must reference each other. This working part must be different from the part documented in bronze #4 and silver #1.

Special Tracks: Improve the function of an existing iGEM project (that your current team did not originally create) and display your achievement on your wiki.

The graphs below depict the GFP production from the F2620 receiver to be higher at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Las. The second graph, depicts the same nature however at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Lux. It is interesting to note that the Las sender, at a lower concentration, promotes a higher GFP expression than the Lux. Our group hypothesized that it would be opposite considering the LuxI sender comes from the same system as F2620. These results show differently.

Summary for Lux Receiver:

When testing the LuxR the AubI showed a higher expression when mixed with 10% of a second sender (even when that sender was a negative control sender). The 40% AubI mixed with 10% negative sender and the 40% AubI mixed with 10% RhlI both expressed higher than the 50% AubI by itself. This result was confirmed in another test where 40% Aub mixed with 10% EsaI and 40% AubI mixed with 10% CerI both expressed higher than the 50% AubI alone. (See graphs below).

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 <br><br>
 <b>Special Tracks:</b> Improve the function of an existing iGEM project (that your current team did not originally create) and display your achievement on your wiki.</p>
+<p>The graphs below depict the GFP production from the F2620 receiver to be higher at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Las. The second graph, depicts the same nature however at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Lux. It is interesting to note that the Las sender, at a lower concentration, promotes a higher GFP expression than the Lux. Our group hypothesized that it would be opposite considering the LuxI sender comes from the same system as F2620. These results show differently.</p>
+<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9a/First_1.png " style="max-width: 600px; width: 80%"></ceenter>
+<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/70/First_2.png " style="max-width: 600px; width: 80%"></center>
 <h3><ins>Summary for Lux Receiver:</ins></h3>