Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | < | + | <h1>The improvement of F2620 receiver:</h1> |
+ | <p>This year's team conducted multiple experiments to re-characterize a an improved part of F2620. The improved part itself can also be viewed <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_F2620:Experience">here</a> on the iGEM registry page. </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | < | + | <h2>F2620 Induced by Synthetic AHLs</h2> |
<p>The graphs below depict the GFP production from the F2620 receiver to be higher at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Las. The second graph, depicts the same nature however at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Lux. It is interesting to note that the Las sender, at a lower concentration, promotes a higher GFP expression than the Lux. Our group hypothesized that it would be opposite considering the LuxI sender comes from the same system as F2620. These results show differently.</p> | <p>The graphs below depict the GFP production from the F2620 receiver to be higher at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Las. The second graph, depicts the same nature however at a higher concentration of the synthetic AHL of Lux. It is interesting to note that the Las sender, at a lower concentration, promotes a higher GFP expression than the Lux. Our group hypothesized that it would be opposite considering the LuxI sender comes from the same system as F2620. These results show differently.</p> | ||
Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | < | + | <h2>F2620 Induced by Sender Supernatants</h2> |
<p>When testing the LuxR the AubI showed a higher expression when mixed with 10% of a second sender (even when that sender was a negative control sender). The 40% AubI mixed with 10% negative sender and the 40% AubI mixed with 10% RhlI both expressed higher than the 50% AubI by itself. This result was confirmed in another test where 40% Aub mixed with 10% EsaI and 40% AubI mixed with 10% CerI both expressed higher than the 50% AubI alone. (See graphs below).</p> | <p>When testing the LuxR the AubI showed a higher expression when mixed with 10% of a second sender (even when that sender was a negative control sender). The 40% AubI mixed with 10% negative sender and the 40% AubI mixed with 10% RhlI both expressed higher than the 50% AubI by itself. This result was confirmed in another test where 40% Aub mixed with 10% EsaI and 40% AubI mixed with 10% CerI both expressed higher than the 50% AubI alone. (See graphs below).</p> | ||
Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | < | + | <h2>F2620 induced by Sender cells on Agar</h2> |
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 04:03, 1 November 2017