Difference between revisions of "PASantiago Chile/results"
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
When we received the DNA, it was resuspended correctly, for the posterior double digest of every part. Which also worked well. | When we received the DNA, it was resuspended correctly, for the posterior double digest of every part. Which also worked well. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | |||
</p> | </p> | ||
| + | <div id="results"> | ||
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/68/Resultasess.jpg" style="margin-top: 31px;"> | ||
<p class="human"> | <p class="human"> | ||
| − | |||
Fig 1.- Resuspended IDT synthesized Gblocks | Fig 1.- Resuspended IDT synthesized Gblocks | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
<p class="human"> | <p class="human"> | ||
Revision as of 00:32, 2 November 2017
First we prove that the sequences were correct and then we sent to synthesize to IDT.
Fig 1.- Resuspended IDT synthesized Gblocks
With all of that, we proceed to do the ligation of the parts to form each module.To
prove it, we did a electrophoresis, where the bands had the right molecular weight.
Therefore, we did the transformation of the E.Coli,inserting both plasmid for then cultivate in plaques.
With the objective of do the final check, we did another electrophoresis, and again we could see that the bands had the right molecular weight.In conclusion all the experimental process was correctly executed.
Results
When we received the DNA, it was resuspended correctly, for the posterior double digest of every part. Which also worked well.
Work in progress. 1/11/12
Work in progress. 1/11/12
Work in Progress 2/11/12
