Difference between revisions of "Team:Berlin diagnostX/Results"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
| − | <div | + | <div="col-12"> |
| − | < | + | <h4>Throughout our research project we developed Standard Operating Procedures, that are presented in the protocols section and an in silico sensor design algorithm that is described in the design section. These process innovations led to the subsequent optimization of a well performing sensor for Taenia Solium:</h4> |
| − | + | </div> | |
| − | </p> | + | <div class="row"> |
| + | <div class="col-6"> | ||
| + | <p></p> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <div class="col-6"> | ||
| + | <img class="img-fluid" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c2/T--Berlin_diagnostX--_Graphik_Zika-final.png"> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="col-6"> | <div class="col-6"> | ||
| − | <img class="img-fluid" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <img class="img-fluid" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8d/T--Berlin_diagnostX--_Graphik_Tso2-final.png"> |
| − | < | + | </div> |
| − | </p> | + | <div class="col-6"> |
| + | <p></p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | < | + | <div class="row"> |
| − | + | <div class="col-6"> | |
| − | < | + | <p></p> |
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <div class="col-6"> | ||
<img class="img-fluid" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/18/T--Berlin_diagnostX--_Graphik_Tso1-final.png"> | <img class="img-fluid" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/18/T--Berlin_diagnostX--_Graphik_Tso1-final.png"> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| − | < | + | <div class="row"> |
| − | <img class="img-fluid" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <div class="col-6"> |
| + | <img class="img-fluid" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/32/T--Berlin_diagnostX--_Graphik_TSMneu-final.png"> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <div class="col-6"> | ||
| + | <p></p> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | <div class="row"> | |
| − | < | + | <div class="col-6"> |
| − | <img class="img-fluid" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/ | + | <p class="text-justify"> |
| − | + | </p> | |
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <div class="col-6"> | ||
| + | <img class="img-fluid" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/3a/T--Berlin_diagnostX--NestedGel.png"> | ||
| + | <p class="text-justify"><b>Fig. 1:</b> Agarose gel of the first nested PCR attempt with the nested template and two toehold primers. PCR products 1 and 3 show the expected length, while lane 2 and 4 show, as anticipated, the failure of the negative controls. <b>1</b>-nested PCR of switch 898 <b>2</b>-negative control of switch 898 (without P1) <b>3</b>-nested PCR of switch 16 <b>4</b>-negative control of switch 16 (without P1) | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Revision as of 01:16, 2 November 2017
Results
Throughout our research project we developed Standard Operating Procedures, that are presented in the protocols section and an in silico sensor design algorithm that is described in the design section. These process innovations led to the subsequent optimization of a well performing sensor for Taenia Solium:
Fig. 1: Agarose gel of the first nested PCR attempt with the nested template and two toehold primers. PCR products 1 and 3 show the expected length, while lane 2 and 4 show, as anticipated, the failure of the negative controls. 1-nested PCR of switch 898 2-negative control of switch 898 (without P1) 3-nested PCR of switch 16 4-negative control of switch 16 (without P1)
