Difference between revisions of "Team:UNOTT/Model"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The models weren't perfect as first: refinement from lab results helped to optimize and correct the models</p> | The models weren't perfect as first: refinement from lab results helped to optimize and correct the models</p> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/66/T--UNOTT--Graph1.png"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 14:50, 22 July 2017
UNOTT
Modeling
When developing Key.Coli, we found it was important to mathematically model possible situations so we could investigate the effects of different situations we might encounter as well as representing every single chemical reaction which could expect. This information was used by the wet lab to assist them by informing them in what to expect. This was done through the use of Python and Tellurium to create easy to read graphs. The models weren't perfect as first: refinement from lab results helped to optimize and correct the models
Gold Medal Criterion #3
To complete for the gold medal criterion #3, please describe your work on this page and fill out the description on your judging form. To achieve this medal criterion, you must convince the judges that your team has gained insight into your project from modeling. You may not convince the judges if your model does not have an effect on your project design or implementation.
Please see the 2017 Medals Page for more information.
Best Model Special Prize
To compete for the Best Model prize, please describe your work on this page and also fill out the description on the judging form. Please note you can compete for both the gold medal criterion #3 and the best model prize with this page.
You must also delete the message box on the top of this page to be eligible for the Best Model Prize.
Inspiration
Here are a few examples from previous teams:
