Aim
In constructing the sequence of a single chain insulin we had to ensure that our sequence was not under any existing patents so that we could submit our sequence into the Open Source iGEM registry. With a bit of help from Maxwell Lawyers we went through several single chain insulin patents, method patents and existing patents for current insulin dispensing devices/therapeutics using the FDA orange book. The goal was to make sure our work did not come under any existing patents so we would not infringe any ownership rights.
Importantly, we recognise the difficulty of being thorough with all existing patents and the content provided is not intended to be legal advice and should not be used as such. To determine whether you are infringing a patent; the best course of action is to seek a qualified patent lawyer.
To examine the way we approached patents - please click on the links below for easy navigation to each section.
How to read a patent
After our chat with Uppsala (check it out in collaborations), our team realised that patents are a very poorly understood area, particularly for young aspiring scientists with new and challenging ideas.
With a resident legal student in our team - we created a quick checklist on How to read a patent
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
1. Patents give an exclusive commercial right to the invention aka. a monopoly
2. The "claims" of a patent, detail what is covered by the patent.
3. If it is NOT in the patent; it is NOT patentable.
2. The "claims" of a patent, detail what is covered by the patent.
3. If it is NOT in the patent; it is NOT patentable.
And it is with this checklist that we approached the analysis of a wide range of patents below.
1. Single Chain Insulin Patents
Although our team attempted to be thorough, we recognise that not all patents can be checked. However, we targeted patents with the greatest relevance to avoid legal suits that may arise. Our primary concern was single chain insulin patents since they have only been recently explored in greater depth and quoted to have benefits like enhanced thermostability. As these single chain insulins are likely to be the next insulin product in the market, we wanted to create one, outside the scope of existing patents, to characterise and compare our product.
Importantly there is an exception in patents for research purposes. This means that if the work you performed is for research purposes only, you do not infringe the relevant patent. You cannot however, submit the part into the open source registry or try and commercialise it. As we are submitting 'Winsulin,' our single chain insulin, it must not be patented.
HELP RUBY HELP RUBY HELP RUBY
.DIMARCHI ET AL.
Single Chain Insulin with high
bioactivity
Patent No: US 9458,220 B2
October 4th
2016
CLAIM |
COMPARISON WITH OUR SEQUENCE |
Y/N |
A single chain insulin agonist analogue with stricture of B-LM-A
wherein B represents an insulin B chain comprising
the sequence R22X25LCGX29… and A represents an insulin A chain
comprising the sequence GIVX4X5CCX8…-R13 |
Both insulin A and B chains involve R groups which stand for
modifications eg. carboxylation. As our insulin B chain does not contain any modifications (except for a substituted glycine on the A chain), our construct is outside the patent |
N |
Furthermore the linking moiety linking the carboxy
terminus of the B chain to the amino terminus of the A chain; further wherein
the linking moiety is an 8 amino acid sequence comprising of the sequence X51X52GSSSX57X58
wherein X51 = group consisting of glycine, alanine, valine,
leucine, isoleucine, isoleucine and ornithine X52 = any amino acid other than tyrosine X57 and X58 are independently selected
form the ground consisting of arginine, lysine and ornithine |
Our amino acid sequence is squarely
outside the scope of 8 amino acids. Even if we did fall within the claim; we do not contain the 8 amino acid sequence using both potential orientations X51 is glutamine or arginine in our sequence B-chain – QR . . . KR – A-chain |
N |
The LM also requires the sequence of GAGSSSRR or a sequence that
differs from GAGSSRR by 1 or 2 amino acids |
Our sequence is 12 amino acids long and differs by more than 4
amino acids. |
N |
LM represents linking moiety linking the carboxyl terminus of
the B chain to the amino terminus of the a chain,
wherein said linking moiety is an 8
amino acid sequence consisting of X51X52X53X54...
wherein X51 is selected
from the group consisting of glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine
and proline… |
Similarly, the patent claim is over an 8 amino
acid sequence. Applying the same principle our; X51 is glutamine or arginine (depending on
orientation) and outside the scope |
N |
LEE ET
AL.
Single Chain Insulin Analog and
a polynucleotide sequence encoding the analog
Patent No: US 6,630,348 B1
October 7th
2003
CLAIM |
COMPARISON WITH OUR SEQUENCE |
Y/N |
A single chain insulin analogue
compound of formula (I) having the properties of greater insulin receptor
binding activity than proinsulin and less insulin receptor binding activity
than insulin:
|
General B – X – A chain single chain formula |
Y |
B and A chain are human
insulin chains, respectively and, |
Our B and A chain are human
insulin chains although our A chain includes a modification (A21 substitution into
glycine) |
N |
X is a joining peptide of
about 5 to 18 amino acids comprising the following sequence: Gly-Gly-Gly-Pro-Gly- Lys-Arg |
Where the term ‘comprising’ is included, the patent requires that the specific sequence named MUST be part
of the linker region. Although our sequence is 12
amino acids long, it does not contain the ‘GGGPGLR’ identified in the patent |
N |
LEE ET
AL.
Single Chain Insulin Analogs
Patent No: EP 1 193 272 B1
October 30th
2004
CLAIM |
COMPARISON WITH OUR SEQUENCE |
Y/N |
A single chain insulin
analogue compound of formula (I) having the properties of greater insulin
receptor binding activity than prosinsulin and less
insulin receptor binding activity than insulin: B Chain – UI – Zn – Y – ZI – Un – A chain |
|
|
B and A chain are human
insulin chains respectively and |
We have a modified A chain |
N |
U is an arginine or lysine
residue |
Our ‘U’
is glutamine |
N |
Z is a glycine |
Z Is Glycine |
Y |
I is
an integer of 2 –
n N is an integer of 0 or 2 and |
The maximum size of the linker
sequence when considering this is 9 amino acids. Since our sequence is 12
amino acids they are outside the scope |
N |
Y is glycine-proline-glycine, or alanine-proline-glycine-aspartic acid–valine, or tyrosine-proline-glycine-aspartic acid-valine, or histidine-proline-glycine-aspartic acid-valine. |
Our sequence has no proline |
N |
KJELDSEN
ET AL.
Single Chain insulin
Patent No: EP 1692168 B1
December 3rd, 2004
CLAIM |
COMPARISON WITH OUR SEQUENCE |
Y/N |
B(1-26)- X1
- X2 - X3- X4- A (1-21),
|
B - linker - A formula |
Y |
|
|
N |
|
In our sequence construct – the A chain is 21 amino acid however it is a modification of the natural protein. It does not fall within an 'analogue' as there is no complete addition/deletion of an amino acid. |
N |
|
We have 2 adjacent basic amino
acid residues and the affinity cannot be tested |
N |
|
|
N |
|
|
N |
|
X3 is glycine |
N |
X4 is a
peptide sequence with the following formula Xa-Xb-Xc-Xd-Xe-XfXg (SEQ
ID NO:129) wherein Xa is selected from the group
consisting of L, R, T, A, H, Q, G, S and V; Xb is selected from the group
consisting of W, G, S, A, H, R, and T; Xc is selected from the group
consisting of L, Y, M, H, R, T, Q, K, V, S, A, G and P; Xd is selected from the group
consisting of R, A, Y, M, S, N, H, and G; Xe is selected from the group
consisting of S, R, A, T, K, P, N, M, H, Q, V, and G; Xf is selected from the group
consisting of G and A; and Xg is selected from the group
consisting of K, R, P, H, F, T, I, Q, W, and A, |
The total linker length that
can be formulated from Xa – Xg is 7 amino acids with the three other
residues for X1 – X3. This totals to a maximum linker
length of 10 amino acids. Our linker is 12
amino acids long. |
N |
WEISS
ET AL.
Fibrillation-resistant insulin
and insulin analogues
Patent No:EP 2074140 B1
April 6th, 2009
CLAIM |
COMPARISON WITH OUR SEQUENCE |
Y/N |
|
Our linker is truncated from
the entire C-peptide to 12 amino acids and has the general formula of B-X-A
where our linker is QRGGGSGGGQKR |
Y |
wherein the truncated linker
is a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of: |
||
a polypeptide having the
sequence GGGPRR |
|
N |
a polypeptide having the
sequence GGPRR |
|
N |
a polypeptide having the
sequence GSEQRR |
|
N |
a polypeptide having the
sequence RREQR |
|
N |
a polypeptide having the
sequence RREALQKR |
|
N |
a polypeptide having the
sequence GAGPRR |
|
N |
a polypeptide having the
sequence GPRR |
|
N |
wherein the insulin B-chain
polypeptide optionally contains one or more of: an aspartate substitution at
the position corresponding to position B10 of insulin, a lysine or an aspartate
substitution at the position corresponding to position B28 of insulin, and a proline substitution at the
position corresponding to position B29 of insulin |
Our B-chain is native human
insulin |
N |
|
Our A-chain does not contain
the relevant substitution |
N |
STOWELL
ET AL.
Chemically and thermodynamically
stable insulin analogues and improved
methods for their production
Patent No: US 9006176 B2
October 16th
2012
CLAIM |
COMPARISON WITH OUR SEQUENCE |
Y/N |
A single chain insulin (SCI)
compound of formula a(I): B chain - C’ – A Chain (Formula (I)) having the properties of
higher affinity for the insulin receptor and lower affinity for the IGF-1
receptor as compared to those of native proinsulin with chemical and
thermodynamic degradation profiles such that the SCI can be formulated and
stored for extended periods of time without refrigeration; |
Correct linker formulation of
B-linker-A |
Y |
W herein B chain and A chain
are modified human insulin chains; and |
Only the A chain is modified |
N |
Wherein C’ covalently links the
C-terminus of the B chain to the N-terminus of the A chain, and is a peptide
of 5 amino acids comprising the following sequence: Y-P-G-D-X (SEQ ID NO: 1);
wherein X is any amino acid; |
No proline (P) and no aspartic
acid (D) |
N |
wherein the B chain is
modified from a native human insulin B chain (SEQ ID NO:11), and A chain is
modified from a native human insulin A chain (SEQ ID NO:10), wherein the
modifications comprise one or more mutations at (1) Gln5, Gln15, Asn18, or
Asn21 of SEQ ID NO:10, or (2) Asn3 or Gln5 of SEQ ID
NO:11; resulting in enhanced resistance to deamidation. |
B is not modified and A chain
does not have similar modifications, rather an addition at residue 1 without
the purpose of resisting deamination. |
N |
2. Method Patents
In looking at patents, we first considered looking at different methods of production – particularly whether or not Bacillus secretory methods are patented for insulin production.
From a preliminary search, Bacillus secretion has been previously patented however most are now expired. If it is possible to find a patent using the same method of production as a previously patented product, it will not infringe anyone elses intellectual property.
From a preliminary search, Bacillus secretion has been previously patented however most are now expired. If it is possible to find a patent using the same method of production as a previously patented product, it will not infringe anyone elses intellectual property.
relatively important PATENT STUFF
STAHL ET AL.
Method for Producing
Heterologous Proteins
Patent No: US4801536A
November 10th, 1985
STAHL ET AL.
CLAIMS |
COMPARISON WITH OUR METHOD |
Y/N |
Status: EXPIRED. Now this
patent has expired. Importantly – it
covers our |
Y |
|
A method for producing a
heterologous protein in a bacterial host cell such that the protein is
exported from the host cell into the culture medium, the method comprising
culturing in a bacterial culture medium a genetically engineered bacterial
strain containing a fusion DNA sequence which comprises a first nucleotide
sequence encoding at least an N-terminal portion of a flagellin
protein native to the bacterial host cell species and a second nucleotide
sequence encoding the heterologous protein, said first nucleotide sequence
being linked via its 3' terminus to the 5' terminus of the second DNA
sequence and said fusion DNA sequence being operatively linked to an
expression control sequence and wherein said N-terminal portion results in
the export of said heterologous protein. |
Our plasmid falls directly
into this means of production. As this patent has since expired and we fall
under it – the
methods that are encoded are free to be used and thus not for law suit. |
Y |
A plasmid as identified in any
of Tables 2 to 5 of the specification by the designation pSPA
or pSPB. |
WB800 plasmid |
N |
A DNA sequence flanked by and
in proper reading frame with a non-wild type open reading frame encoding a
secretory signal sequence having the amino acid sequence: pSPB4, pSPB9,
pSPB19, pSPB20, pSPB23, pSPB28 |
None of the plasmids mentioned
are being used nor are the AA sequences that are described in greater detail
in the patent |
N |
KOVACEVIC ET AL.
Method for expression and
secretion in Bacillus
Patent No: US5032510A
July 16th, 1991
CLAIMS |
COMPARISON WITH OUR METHOD |
Y/N |
STATUS: Expired. The invention
method claimed is now open source. |
Y |
|
1. A method for expressing a
peptide in Bacillus, said method comprising |
We are expressing a
peptide/polypeptide in Bacillus |
Y |
a) transforming a Bacillus
host cell which is rendered competent for transformation with a recombinant
DNA expression vector which is selectable and capable of replication in said
host cell, said vector comprising |
Our Bacillus host cell was
made competent specifically for recombinant DNA uptake. The expression vector
is also capable of replication |
Y |
1) the transcriptional and
translational activating sequence of the Staphylococcus aureus nuclease gene
and 2) a cloned DNA sequence that
codes for a polypeptide, and |
This vector however does not
include a Staph. Aureus nuclease gene. Winsulin is a single poly-peptide
chain, while Insulin is a dual-peptide complex |
N |
b) culturing said transformed
cell under conditions suitable for expression of said polypeptide, subject to
the limitation 1) that said cloned DNA sequence that codes for said
polypeptide and said transcriptional and translational activating sequence
are immediately adjacent, in translational reading frame and positioned for
expression of said polypeptide and 2) that said cloned DNA sequence that
codes for said polypeptide is exclusive of the nucleotide triplet that codes
for the N-terminal amino acid of said polypeptide when said amino acid is
methionine. |
This potentially could be an
issue, depending on the reading and interpretation. However, since we fall
outside of the above key aspects of this individual claim, we are still in
the clear. |
N |
BERKA ET AL.
Heterologous polypeptide
expressed in filamentous fungi, processes for their preparation, and vectors
for their preparation
Patent No: EP0369817B1
April 24th, 1996
CLAIMS |
COMPARISON WITH OUR METHOD |
Y/N |
Status: EXPIRED The expiry date of this patent
is extremely critical as it patents the production of proteins in a Bacillus
cell with multiple gene knockouts. Importantly, the strain used by us, WB800
contains 8 protease knockouts and thus falls within the scope of this patent.
As the patent has expired –this
means of production is available for use. |
Y |
|
Claim 1 A Bacillus cell
characterised in containing a mutation in the epr gene,
said epr gene encoding a protein
comprising the amino acid sequence of Figure 6 or an evolutionary homologue
thereof of other Bacillus species, having protease activity, said
mutation resulting in inhibition of the production by said cell of proteolytically active epr gene
product. |
We have a mutation in the epr gene in WB800, which renders the EPR protein inactive
such that it does not have a proteolytically active
epr gene product |
Y |
Claim 16 A method for producing a
heterologous polypeptide in a Bacillus cell, characterised in
comprising: introducing into said cell a gene encoding said heterologous
polypeptide, modified to be expressed in said cell,
said Bacillus cell containing mutations in the apr and npr genes,
and further containing mutations in one or more of the genes encoding the Epr protease, RP-I, or RP-II, said Epr,
RP-I and RP-II comprising the amino acid sequences set out in Figures 6, 10
and 14 respectively, or evolutionary homologues thereof of
other Bacillus species, having protease activity, wherein said
mutation results in the inhibition of the production by said cell of proteolytically active Epr
protease, RP-I or RP-II. |
We have a mutation in aprE and nprE and also epr and thus fall
within this claim. |
Y |
WIDNER ET AL.
Methods for producing a
polypeptide in a Bacillus cell
Patent No: US6255076B1
July 3rd, 2001
CLAIMS |
COMPARISON WITH OUR METHOD |
Y/N |
1. A method for producing a
polypeptide, comprising: 2. (a) cultivating
a Bacillus cell in a medium conducive for the production of the
polypeptide, wherein the Bacillus cell comprises a nucleic acid
construct comprising a tandem promoter in which each promoter sequence of the
tandem promoter is operably linked to a nucleic acid sequence encoding the
polypeptide, wherein the tandem promoter comprises promoters selected from
the group consisting of the amyL promoter, amyQ promoter, aprH promoter, cryIIIA promoter, subtilisin
Carlsberg gene promoter, and consensus promoters of the amyL
promoter, amyQ promoter, aprH
promoter, cryIIIA promoter, and subtilisin
Carlsberg gene promoter having the sequence TTGACA for the “_35” region
and TATAAT for the “_10” region; and (b) isolating the polypeptide
from the cultivation medium. |
We do not have a tandem
promoter series, therefore we fall outside of this
claim. We are also using the … promoter, which is not listed there. We will be cultivating the
medium for polypeptide isolation however. |
N |
11. A method for producing a
polypeptide, comprising: (a) cultivating
a Bacillus cell in a medium conducive for the
production of the polypeptide, wherein the Bacillus cell
comprises a nucleic acid construct comprising (i)
a consensus promoter obtained from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens alpha-amylase
gene (amy Q)
or Bacillus subtilis alpha-amylase gene (amy
E) having the sequence TTGACA for the “_35” region and TATAAT for the “_10” region operably linked to a single copy of a nucleic acid
sequence encoding the polypeptide and (ii) an mRNA
processing/stabilizing sequence located downstream of the consensus promoter
and upstream of the nucleic acid sequence encoding the polypeptide; and (b) isolating the polypeptide
from the cultivation medium. |
Arguable – how to define whether the medium we will use will
be ‘conductive’ or not is vague. We are not using a consensus
promoter from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, but are
using the Bacillus subtilis strain. The promoter we have selected is p-Spac We also do not have an mRNA
processing or stabilising sequence in our gblock. We are isolating our
polypeptide from the cultivation medium. |
N |
BEDZYK ET AL.
Natural promoters for gene
expression and metabolic monitoring in Bacillus species
Patent No: EP1294909 A2
June 29th, 2001
CLAIMS |
COMPARISON WITH OUR METHOD |
Y/N |
Legal Status: abandoned patent Once a patent is abandoned it
does not have any effect. |
N |
|
A method for the expression of
a coding region of interest in a Bacillus sp
comprising: a) providing a transformed
Bacillus sp cell having a chimeric gene comprising
a nucleic acid fragment comprising the promoter region of a Bacillus gene
operably linked to a coding region of interest expressible in a Bacillus sp, wherein the nucleic acid fragment comprising the
promoter region of a Bacillus gene is selected from the group consisting of narGHJT, csn, yncM, yvyD, yvaWXY,
ydjL, sunA, and yolIJK and homologues thereof; and b) growing the transformed
Bacillus sp cell of step (a) in the absence of
oxygen wherein the chimeric gene of step (a) is expressed. |
Although we do use the yncM tag mentioned in this patent – however their use of YncM
is as a nucleic acid fragment in the promoter region which is distinct from
our purpose. |
N |
3. Orange Book/FDA
We also considered patents without single chain insulin to identify whether existing commercial / FDA products involved patented methods eg. storage etc., that may be broad enough to include insulin analogues like Winsulin.
Looking through the Orange Book, a drug database showing all products that have been approved - including their therapeutic equivalences, our team searched through all 101 entries that involved insulin to determine whether or not we would fall under a patent here.
We also considered patents without single chain insulin to identify whether existing commercial / FDA products involved patented methods eg. storage etc., that may be broad enough to include insulin analogues like Winsulin.
Looking through the Orange Book, a drug database showing all products that have been approved - including their therapeutic equivalences, our team searched through all 101 entries that involved insulin to determine whether or not we would fall under a patent here.