Evidence of Protease Knockout in Bacillus subtilis WB800
Figure 1: Wild type (WT) B.subtilis 168 and WB800 B.subtilis grown on an LB milk plate.
WB800 has 8 proteases knocked out of it and this test was used to determine whether in fact this was the correct strain with knocked out proteases. With 8 proteases removed, we did not expect to see clearing around the colony as a result of the proteolytic breakdown of the milk in the plate as you see in the 2 WT168 colonies on the plate. This result was evident on the plate as there was no clear zone around the WB800 strains, whereas substantial clearing is seen around the WT168 colonies.
Evidence of Chromosome Integration in Bacillus subtilis WB800
Figure 2: pUS258::YncM insulin transformed into B.subtilis WB800 patched on LB Agar + 1% starch + Spectinomycin 100.
pUS258 is an integrative plasmid, meaning when transformation occurs, the insert will integrate into the amylase genes of the chromosome of Bacillus, knocking them out. Therefore, by patching these transformants on starch plates, cells which have had integration of the YncM insulin gene into their amylase genes will be unable to digest starch on the plate. When flooded with iodine, the colonies in which integration have occurred are identified as showing no visible clearing. The colonies without clearing can therefore can be expected to contain the integrated plasmid, and may be induced to produce insulin.
Confirmation of Inserts in pSB1C3
Figure 3: Double digest of constructs in pSB1C3 using EcoRI and PstI. Products were run on a 1.5% agarose gel in 0.5X TBE at 80V for 2 hours and post stained with GelGreen (Bio-rad) according to manufacturers protocol.
Our constructs were ligated into the submission vector, pSB1C3 to submit as composite parts to the iGEM registry. PCR was performed on the plasmid preps across the insert site using high fidelity polymerase and those PCR products were sequenced with the Australian Genomic Research Facility to ensure we would be submitting the correct sequence. The sequencing data showed some disparity in the YncM insulin construct compared to the G-block that was ligated. This is reflected in the gel in figure 3 that shows multiple digested bands. This could potentially be due to multiple partial inserts but we cannot confirm this. Based on this data, we made the decision not to submit this part to the registry and unfortunately, despite our attempts, we couldn’t redo the process due to a limited supply of our construct and time. On the other hand, our other constructs that can be seen in lanes 2-6 show clean single bands that correspond to their respective construct sizes (Cytoplasmic Winsulin: 306bp, Ecotin Winsulin: 867bp, YncM Winsulin: 522bp, Cytoplasmic insulin: 392, Ecotin insulin: 917bp, YncM insulin: 583). These were additionally confirmed with accurate sequencing data and so were able to be submitted.
Evidence for ELISA Results
Figure 4: ELISA confirms expression of constructs, and the correct folding of Insulin and Winsulin constructs. ELISA was performed on cell lysates for all constructs and on the cell culture media of YncM Winsulin from B.subtilis, according to the manufacturer's protocol.
This showed the presence of expressed insulin or Winsulin in cells expressing Cytoplasmic expressed insulin, Cytoplasmic Winsulin, Ecotin expressed insulin and YncM Winsulin, as well as proving their ability to bind anti-insulin antibodies. 5µL of cell lysates were tested at multiple dilutions, shown here are the 1:1 dilutions. The inclusion of a whole-cell lysate control for YncM Winsulin proves the YncM secretion tag was effectively causing Bacillus secretion of Winsulin into the surrounding media, as it was not found in the cell lysate fraction.
We performed an ELISA assay using capture antibodies specific to insulin (Figure 4). The purpose of performing this assay was:
To identify if our insulin constructs had formed folded proteins of a shape similar enough to native human insulin that they would be bound by an anti-insulin antibody.
Determine if we produced these constructs in our cells.
Identify if the translocation tags used on some constructs (namely YncM Winsulin) transported the protein where we had predicted.
From this assay we were able to confirm that our insulin analogues bound insulin antibodies. The parts tested, Cytoplasmic insulin, Cytoplasmic Winsulin, Ecotin insulin and YncM Winsulin, therefore all have a structure very similar to that of native insulin. The fact that we detected them in the ELISA assay also confirmed expression of our constructs.
We also used this assay to identify the location of proteins with tags inducing translocation to different parts of the cell. Whilst we were unable to test the periplasmic fraction of Ecotin insulin due to time constraints, we did test our YncM Winsulin construct. YncM is an N-terminal tag which, when fused to a protein of interest and expressed in Bacillus subtilis, directs its secretion out of the cell and into the surrounding media. We proved that YncM does induce secretion by showing that whilst YncM Winsulin was present in the surrounding media, it was completely absent in the cell lysate fractions, as expected.
To identify if our insulin constructs had formed folded proteins of a shape similar enough to native human insulin that they would be bound by an anti-insulin antibody.
Determine if we produced these constructs in our cells.
Identify if the translocation tags used on some constructs (namely YncM Winsulin) transported the protein where we had predicted.