Difference between revisions of "Team:Sydney Australia/Demonstrate"

 
(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
   }
 
   }
  
 +
#please h7 {
 +
  font-family: 'Quicksand', sans-serif;
 +
color: #3e3f3f;
 +
font-size: 16px;
 +
text-align: center;
 +
 +
}
 
#please p {
 
#please p {
 
   font-family: 'Quicksand', sans-serif;
 
   font-family: 'Quicksand', sans-serif;
Line 43: Line 50:
 
#please h2 {
 
#please h2 {
 
   font-family: 'Quicksand', sans-serif;
 
   font-family: 'Quicksand', sans-serif;
color: #93bcc1;
 
 
font-size: 25px;
 
font-size: 25px;
 
}
 
}
Line 104: Line 110:
  
 
<div class= "content" align = "center" id = "please">
 
<div class= "content" align = "center" id = "please">
<h1>What We Demonstrated:</h1>
+
<h1>What We Demonstrated</h1>
<div class = "divider1"><br><br>
+
<div class = "divider1"></div><br><br>
<h4>We demonstrated that our insulin analogues Cytoplasmic Proinsulin, Cytoplasmic Winsulin, Ecotin Proinsulin and YncM Winsulin all bound insulin antibodies. Therefore they all have a structure very similar to that of native human insulin, which was an important precursor result to validate going on to test for bioactivity in a glucose uptake assay. Furthermore, we confirmed that insulin constructs were being successfully expressed in the cell lysates. The ELISA assay also allowed us to demonstrate that YncM-Winsulin was working as expected. Since the YncM tag, when expressed as a fusion protein in Bacillius, is a secretory tag, we confirmed its functionality by detecting its presence in the surrounding media, but not in the cell lysate.<br><br>
+
While we used well characterised commercial strains of E.coli, BL21 and SHUFFLE, to express the insulin in the periplasm and cytoplasm respectively, the B.subtilis strain that we were using for secretion, WB800, is a non-comercially used strain and was donated to us from the Professor Sui-Lam Wong’s lab at the University of Calgary, Canada. This strain was appealing to use in our project due to the 8 proteases which it has knocked out. In order to demonstrate that it was in fact an 8 protease knockout, we plated this strain, along side wild-type B.subtilis 168 on a milk plate. If the WB800 strain was in fact a protease knockout, a clear zone around the colony on the milk plate, which results from the proteolysis of the milk proteins, would be very minimal or non-visible compared to the WT168 strain. Our results showed no signs clearing resulting from protease activity in the WB800 strains and therefore we demonstrated that this strain was in fact deficient in proteases compared to the WT168 strain, making it ideal to use in protein expression.<br><br>
+
  
Again, our E.coli expression vector, pET15b, is a well-known and characterised system for inducible expression that has been demonstrated to work. The expression vector we chose for expressing in our Bacillus secretion system, pUS258 was constructed in our lab by a PhD student. This vector is an E.coli/Bacillus shuttle vector that is also integrative in B.subtilis. Integration of the gene inserted into this vector occurs in the region of the B.subtilis genome which results in the knockout of 2 amylase genes, AmyE. It was important that we did not use an integrative vector which integrates into a protease gene that was knocked out in our WB800 strain as this would not be possible. In order to demonstrate whether this vector was in fact integrative and did in fact knockout these two genes, our transformants were plated on LB+starch plates, and if integration did occur, starch would not be broken down and when flooded with iodine, the plate would not show any clearing around the colonies. Our results showed many colonies which did not result in starch breakdown, as well as very few colonies which were able to break down starch, and hence we were able to demonstrate that this vector was in fact integrative and functional.  Therefore, we were able to effectively demonstrate that our expression systems were favourable for protein expression and functional, in particular, our B.subtilis expression system which was not well characterised. <br><br>
+
<h4>The team started this project with the aim of expressing and purifying human proinsulin as well as our own novel open-source single chain insulin, Winsulin in a cost-effective, efficient and simple manner. We aimed to do this using three expression systems: the E. coli cytoplasm, E. coli periplasm, and secreted into the surrounding medium by B. subtilis.
 +
Based on this aim, what we set out to demonstrate what we believe was achievable over the course of the year. This was:
 +
<br><br>
 +
- To demonstrate that we set up a system which was favourable for protein expression.<br>
 +
- That we were able to design and express our own open-source single chain insulin, Winsulin, along with human proinsulin that will be correctly folded.<br>
 +
- That we could target expression to the cytoplasm, periplasm, as well as the extracellular medium (secreted) and that we could easily purify these.<br>
 +
- That our insulins will be biologically functional when tested with glucose uptake assays.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
BL21 E. coli and SHUFFLE E. coli are well-characterised commercial strains of E. coli. These were used to express insulin in the periplasm and cytoplasm respectively. The WB800 strain of Bacillus subtilis was used for insulin secretion. This strain is a non-commercial strain, and it was donated to us from Professor Sui-Lam Wong’s laboratory at the University of Calgary, Canada. This strain was appealing to use in our project due as 8 proteases had been knocked out of the genome, eliminating the chance that these proteases could degrade insulin within B. subtilis. In order to demonstrate that these 8 proteases were knocked out, we plated this strain alongside wild-type B. subtilis 168 on an LB+milk plate. In the wild-type B. subtilis 168 strain, these proteases proteolysed the milk on the plate, forming a clear area around the colonies. If the WB800 strain was in fact a protease knockout, no proteolysis would be expected and either a minimal or no clear zone would be detected. Our results showed no signs of clearing resulting from protease activity in the WB800 strains, demonstrating that this strain was in fact deficient in proteases compared to the WT168 strain. This property made it ideal for protein expression.<br><br>
 +
<center><img class = "img-responsive" align="center" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b9/T--Sydney_Australia--Results1.png" width= "50%"></center>
 +
<h7><b>Figure 1:</b> Wild type (WT) B.subtilis 168 and WB800 B.subtilis grown on an LB milk plate. <br></h7>
  
The next step was to demonstrate that through the use of this expression system, that we were able to induce expression of both our Winsulin and human proinsulin. We were able to demonstrate this in our ELISA assay through the detection of binding to anti-insulin antibodies. In this assay we used whole cell lysates which were induced to express each of our 6 insulin constructs as we were assaying whether any insulin was produced, regardless of where it was being targeted. Along side this, we also used the his-tag purified media from the B.subtilis cells. The ELISA demonstrated that in our whole cell lysates for E.coli cells induced to express Cytoplasmic proinsulin, Ecotin proinsulin, Cytoplasmic winsulin, as well as the purified medium from B.subtilis expressing YncM Winsulin, which were all treated with proteases to cleave off secretion tags, and for proinsulin, the c-peptide to produce functional insulin, insulin which was able to bind to anti-insulin antibodies was produced. This was particularly exciting for the single chain insulin we designed, as this is novel and not previously tested and means that we designed an insulin that is similar enough to native human insulin and binds to anti-insulin antibodies and does not need an extra cleavage step of the c-peptide. The binding to anti-insulin antibodies demonstrates that the protein is not only expressed but also correctly folded, as antibodies are extremely specific to the protein in which they bind.<br><br>
+
<br><h4>
 +
Our E.coli expression vector, pET15b, is a well-known and characterised system for inducible expression that has been demonstrated to work. The expression vector we chose for expressing insulin in our Bacillus secretion system, pUS258, was constructed in our lab by a PhD student. This vector is an E.coli/Bacillus SHUFFLE vector that is also integrative in the B. subtilis genome. Integration of the gene (i.e. in our case, an insulin construct) inserted into pET15b into the B. subtilis genome results in the knockout of 2 amylase genes, AmyE. It was important that our integrative vector did not integrate into a protease gene that was knocked out in our WB800 strain – had it done so, integration would not have been successful. In order to demonstrate that this vector was in fact integrative and did knockout these two genes, our transformants were plated onto LB+starch plates. If integration was successful, the amylase genes would be knocked out and thus no amylase would be produced to break down starch. When flooded with iodine, the LB+starch plate would not show any clearing of starch around the colonies. Our results showed that many colonies did not break down starch, and starch break down occurred in only a few colonies. This demonstrated that the pUS258 vector was in fact integrative and functional. Hence, we were able to effectively demonstrate that our expression systems, particular our B. subtilis expression system which was not well characterised, were both functional and favourable for protein expression.<br><br></h4>
  
Furthermore, we also set out to demonstrate that our expressed insulin would be targeted to the cytoplasm and periplasm of E.coli, and secreted into the medium by B.subtilis through the use of sequence specific tags. The cytoplasmic constructs were untagged and hence, would remain where they were expressed, the cytoplasm. The positive result for the cytoplasmic constructs in the ELISA was enough to demonstrate that correctly folded protein was being produced in the cytoplasm. The fact that the ELISA detected neither proinsulin nor winsulin in the B.subtilis whole cell lysates, however, did detect Winsulin in the medium, is proof that the YncM tag is targeting the protein to be secreted into the medium. We were not able to prove that the Ecotin tag used to target the protein to the periplasm of E.coli was functional as when we ran the periplasmic extract from these cells induced to express ecotin-tagged insulin on an SDS-page gel, we were not able to see any indication of induced protein when compared to the negative control.<br><br>
+
<img class = "img-responsive" align="center" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0c/T--Sydney_Australia--Results2.png" width= "50%">
 +
<h7><b>Figure 2:</b> pUS258::YncM insulin transformed into <i>B.subtilis</i> WB800 patched on LB Agar + 1% starch + Spectinomycin 100. <br><br></h7>
 +
<h4>
 +
The next step was to demonstrate that our insulins were expressed following IPTG induction. In an ELISA assay, we tested for the presence of insulin in whole cell lysate from E. coli expressing cytoplasmic and Ecotin insulin, whole cell lysate from B. subtilis expressing YncM insulin, as well as the presence of insulin secreted by B. subtilis in His-tag purified media. Prior to the ELISA assay, all lysates and media were treated with proteases to remove expression tags, His-tags, and in the case of proinsulin the C-peptide was removed to form active insulin. <br><br>
 +
</h4>
 +
<center><img class = "img-responsive"  align="center" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/72/T--Sydney_Australia--Results4.png" width= "50%"></center>
 +
<h7>Figure 4: ELISA confirms expression of constructs, and the correct folding of Insulin and Winsulin constructs.</h7>
 +
<br><br><h4>
 +
Cytoplasmic proinsulin and Cytoplasmic Winsulin were found in E. coli whole cell lysate, demonstrating that induction of E. coli to produce insulin in the cytoplasm was successful.  
 +
Ecotin proinsulin was also detected in whole cell lysate of E. coli cells. Whole cell lysate was used for this assay rather than the periplasmic fraction, as SDS-PAGE could not determine that insulin had been induced in the periplasmic fraction. As a result, we were unable to test whether the Ecotin tag had directed insulin expression to the periplasm.
 +
YncM Winsulin was detected in the His-tag purified B. subtilis medium. The presence of YncM-tagged insulin in purified media demonstrates that our YncM tag did successfully target proteins for section, and that our purification step retained at least some Winsulin.<br><br>
 +
Since antibodies have a high binding specificity, the binding of our insulins to anti-insulin antibodies is a strong indication that our insulins were folded correctly and thus have a very high structural similarity to native insulin. Positive ELISA results for both Cytoplasmic Winsulin and YncM Winsulin were particularly exciting, as they demonstrate that our novel, previously untested Winsulins are able to bind to anti-insulin antibodies and are thus highly structurally similar to native insulin. <br></h4>
 +
 
 +
<center><img class = "img-responsive" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/ff/T--Sydney_Australia--Results5.png" width= "100%"></center>
 +
<h7>Figure 5: Expressed recombinant insulins stimulate glycogen synthesis. 4A and 4B: Comparison of mean glycogen synthesis rate in a glucose uptake assay using human HepG2 (4A) and murine AML12 cell lines (4B). 4C: Comparison of mean rate of glucose oxidation in HepG2 cell culture from glucose uptake assay. Conditions indicated on the graphs are: Basal (no insulin added); Ecotin Proinsulin (from whole cell lysate with trypsin treatment); Cytoplasmic Proinsulin (from whole cell lysate with trypsin treatment); YncM Winsulin (cell culture media only). Refer to protocols page for experimental details. Error bars represent SEM, horizontal bars indicate statistical significance (* = p<0.05, ** = p<0.0001) calculated with GraphPad Prism using unpaired 1-tailed T-test, n=3.<br><br></h7>
 +
<h4>
 +
 
 +
To validate physiological activity of Cytoplasmic proinsulin, Ecotin proinsulin, and secreted YncM Winsulin which were detected in the highest concentrations in the ELISA, we performed glucose uptake assays using both mouse and human adipocyte cell lines. Measurement of the rate of glycogen synthesis as part of this assay found that cells treated with Ecotin and Cytoplasmic proinsulin had significantly higher activity than cells at the basal level. The results of this assay also gave a strong indication that secreted YncM Winsulin is biologically functional, however the results for YncM Winsulin were not considered statistically significant and hence could not be definitively proven. This could be due to the fact that we did not have sufficient insulin remaining from the His-tag purified B. subtilis media to perform the assay at the recommended concentration of 10nM insulin. It is possible that insulin was lost during the His-tag purification step, or that only small amounts of insulin were secreted by B. subtilis in the first place. Both of these possibilities will be tested further. <br><br>
 +
 
 +
A more in depth evaluation of our future direction can be found on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Sydney_Australia/Results">results</a> page.
  
To validate physiological activity of Cytoplasmic proinsulin, Ecotin proinsulin, and secreted YncM winsulin which were detected in the highest concentrations in the ELISA, We performed glucose uptake assays using both mice and human cell lines. Ecotin and Cytoplasmic proinsulin which had the c-peptide cleaved to produce functional human insulin, proved to have significant activity compared to basal levels. This was seen in the glucose uptake assay where we were measuring the rate of glycogen synthesis. There is also a strong indication that secreted YNCM Winsulin is biologically functional, however the results from the glucose oxidation assay were not significant and hence could not be definitively proven. This could be due to the fact that we did not have enough (maybe the His-tag purification step was inefficient or not enough protein was secreted – we will further testing for this. <br><br>
 
 
</h4>
 
</h4>
<h1>Overall, we believe that this project was a success! </h1>
+
 
 +
<h2>Overall, we believe that this project was a success!</h2>
 
<div class = "divider2"></div>
 
<div class = "divider2"></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 124: Line 159:
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
</div>
 
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 +
 
{{:Team:Sydney_Australia/templates/Footer}}
 
{{:Team:Sydney_Australia/templates/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 02:18, 2 November 2017

What We Demonstrated



The team started this project with the aim of expressing and purifying human proinsulin as well as our own novel open-source single chain insulin, Winsulin in a cost-effective, efficient and simple manner. We aimed to do this using three expression systems: the E. coli cytoplasm, E. coli periplasm, and secreted into the surrounding medium by B. subtilis. Based on this aim, what we set out to demonstrate what we believe was achievable over the course of the year. This was:

- To demonstrate that we set up a system which was favourable for protein expression.
- That we were able to design and express our own open-source single chain insulin, Winsulin, along with human proinsulin that will be correctly folded.
- That we could target expression to the cytoplasm, periplasm, as well as the extracellular medium (secreted) and that we could easily purify these.
- That our insulins will be biologically functional when tested with glucose uptake assays.

BL21 E. coli and SHUFFLE E. coli are well-characterised commercial strains of E. coli. These were used to express insulin in the periplasm and cytoplasm respectively. The WB800 strain of Bacillus subtilis was used for insulin secretion. This strain is a non-commercial strain, and it was donated to us from Professor Sui-Lam Wong’s laboratory at the University of Calgary, Canada. This strain was appealing to use in our project due as 8 proteases had been knocked out of the genome, eliminating the chance that these proteases could degrade insulin within B. subtilis. In order to demonstrate that these 8 proteases were knocked out, we plated this strain alongside wild-type B. subtilis 168 on an LB+milk plate. In the wild-type B. subtilis 168 strain, these proteases proteolysed the milk on the plate, forming a clear area around the colonies. If the WB800 strain was in fact a protease knockout, no proteolysis would be expected and either a minimal or no clear zone would be detected. Our results showed no signs of clearing resulting from protease activity in the WB800 strains, demonstrating that this strain was in fact deficient in proteases compared to the WT168 strain. This property made it ideal for protein expression.

Figure 1: Wild type (WT) B.subtilis 168 and WB800 B.subtilis grown on an LB milk plate.

Our E.coli expression vector, pET15b, is a well-known and characterised system for inducible expression that has been demonstrated to work. The expression vector we chose for expressing insulin in our Bacillus secretion system, pUS258, was constructed in our lab by a PhD student. This vector is an E.coli/Bacillus SHUFFLE vector that is also integrative in the B. subtilis genome. Integration of the gene (i.e. in our case, an insulin construct) inserted into pET15b into the B. subtilis genome results in the knockout of 2 amylase genes, AmyE. It was important that our integrative vector did not integrate into a protease gene that was knocked out in our WB800 strain – had it done so, integration would not have been successful. In order to demonstrate that this vector was in fact integrative and did knockout these two genes, our transformants were plated onto LB+starch plates. If integration was successful, the amylase genes would be knocked out and thus no amylase would be produced to break down starch. When flooded with iodine, the LB+starch plate would not show any clearing of starch around the colonies. Our results showed that many colonies did not break down starch, and starch break down occurred in only a few colonies. This demonstrated that the pUS258 vector was in fact integrative and functional. Hence, we were able to effectively demonstrate that our expression systems, particular our B. subtilis expression system which was not well characterised, were both functional and favourable for protein expression.

Figure 2: pUS258::YncM insulin transformed into B.subtilis WB800 patched on LB Agar + 1% starch + Spectinomycin 100.

The next step was to demonstrate that our insulins were expressed following IPTG induction. In an ELISA assay, we tested for the presence of insulin in whole cell lysate from E. coli expressing cytoplasmic and Ecotin insulin, whole cell lysate from B. subtilis expressing YncM insulin, as well as the presence of insulin secreted by B. subtilis in His-tag purified media. Prior to the ELISA assay, all lysates and media were treated with proteases to remove expression tags, His-tags, and in the case of proinsulin the C-peptide was removed to form active insulin.

Figure 4: ELISA confirms expression of constructs, and the correct folding of Insulin and Winsulin constructs.

Cytoplasmic proinsulin and Cytoplasmic Winsulin were found in E. coli whole cell lysate, demonstrating that induction of E. coli to produce insulin in the cytoplasm was successful. Ecotin proinsulin was also detected in whole cell lysate of E. coli cells. Whole cell lysate was used for this assay rather than the periplasmic fraction, as SDS-PAGE could not determine that insulin had been induced in the periplasmic fraction. As a result, we were unable to test whether the Ecotin tag had directed insulin expression to the periplasm. YncM Winsulin was detected in the His-tag purified B. subtilis medium. The presence of YncM-tagged insulin in purified media demonstrates that our YncM tag did successfully target proteins for section, and that our purification step retained at least some Winsulin.

Since antibodies have a high binding specificity, the binding of our insulins to anti-insulin antibodies is a strong indication that our insulins were folded correctly and thus have a very high structural similarity to native insulin. Positive ELISA results for both Cytoplasmic Winsulin and YncM Winsulin were particularly exciting, as they demonstrate that our novel, previously untested Winsulins are able to bind to anti-insulin antibodies and are thus highly structurally similar to native insulin.

Figure 5: Expressed recombinant insulins stimulate glycogen synthesis. 4A and 4B: Comparison of mean glycogen synthesis rate in a glucose uptake assay using human HepG2 (4A) and murine AML12 cell lines (4B). 4C: Comparison of mean rate of glucose oxidation in HepG2 cell culture from glucose uptake assay. Conditions indicated on the graphs are: Basal (no insulin added); Ecotin Proinsulin (from whole cell lysate with trypsin treatment); Cytoplasmic Proinsulin (from whole cell lysate with trypsin treatment); YncM Winsulin (cell culture media only). Refer to protocols page for experimental details. Error bars represent SEM, horizontal bars indicate statistical significance (* = p<0.05, ** = p<0.0001) calculated with GraphPad Prism using unpaired 1-tailed T-test, n=3.

To validate physiological activity of Cytoplasmic proinsulin, Ecotin proinsulin, and secreted YncM Winsulin which were detected in the highest concentrations in the ELISA, we performed glucose uptake assays using both mouse and human adipocyte cell lines. Measurement of the rate of glycogen synthesis as part of this assay found that cells treated with Ecotin and Cytoplasmic proinsulin had significantly higher activity than cells at the basal level. The results of this assay also gave a strong indication that secreted YncM Winsulin is biologically functional, however the results for YncM Winsulin were not considered statistically significant and hence could not be definitively proven. This could be due to the fact that we did not have sufficient insulin remaining from the His-tag purified B. subtilis media to perform the assay at the recommended concentration of 10nM insulin. It is possible that insulin was lost during the His-tag purification step, or that only small amounts of insulin were secreted by B. subtilis in the first place. Both of these possibilities will be tested further.

A more in depth evaluation of our future direction can be found on the results page.

Overall, we believe that this project was a success!