Difference between revisions of "Team:BostonU HW/Silver"

Line 124: Line 124:
 
Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is safe, responsible and good for the world. You could accomplish this through engaging with your local, national and/or international communities or other approaches. Please note that standard surveys will not fulfill this criteria.
 
Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is safe, responsible and good for the world. You could accomplish this through engaging with your local, national and/or international communities or other approaches. Please note that standard surveys will not fulfill this criteria.
 
</h4>
 
</h4>
<div class="text_section" style="margin-top:2%;">
+
<div class="text_section" style="margin-top:2%; margin-bottom:3%;">
 
<div class="text">
 
<div class="text">
 
During our iGEM project we made sure to include and integrate human practices every step of the way. For a full write up of our human practices activities refer to our wiki page:
 
During our iGEM project we made sure to include and integrate human practices every step of the way. For a full write up of our human practices activities refer to our wiki page:

Revision as of 17:20, 29 October 2017

BostonU_HW

Silver Medal

Silver Medal Requirements

Validated Part / Validated Contribution

Convince the judges that something you created (art and design, hardware, software, etc.) performs its intended function. Provide thorough documentation of this validation on your team wiki.

The end to end hardware system that we have created is documented in its entirety throughout our Wiki. Navigate through the entire system comprised of:



Collaboration

Convince the judges you have significantly worked with any other registered iGEM team in a meaningful way. For example, mentor a team, characterize a part, troubleshoot a project, model/simulate a system or validate a software/hardware solution to a synbio problem, or be the recipient of any of these activities.
You should convince the judges that the nature of your interaction is bi-directional; they may look at the other team's wiki to see what they say about your interaction. Simply filling out a survey for a team is not enough to demonstrate a significant interaction)

Our team engaged in collaborations with three other iGEM Teams: the BostonU Wetlab Team, the Harvard iGEM Team and the Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) Team. Please refer to our Collaboration wiki page for a full write up on each of these collaborations:

Human Practices

Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is safe, responsible and good for the world. You could accomplish this through engaging with your local, national and/or international communities or other approaches. Please note that standard surveys will not fulfill this criteria.

During our iGEM project we made sure to include and integrate human practices every step of the way. For a full write up of our human practices activities refer to our wiki page: