Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | <h2 style="margin-bottom:0% !important;"> | + | <h2 style="margin-bottom:0% !important;">Collaboration</h2> |
− | <h4 style="margin-top:0%; !important;"> | + | <h4 style="margin-top:0%; !important;"> |
+ | Convince the judges you have significantly worked with any other registered iGEM team in a meaningful way. For example, mentor a team, characterize a part, troubleshoot a project, model/simulate a system or validate a software/hardware solution to a synbio problem, or be the recipient of any of these activities. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | You should convince the judges that the nature of your interaction is bi-directional; they may look at the other team's wiki to see what they say about your interaction. Simply filling out a survey for a team is not enough to demonstrate a significant interaction) | ||
+ | </h4> | ||
<div class="text_section" style="margin-top:2%;"> | <div class="text_section" style="margin-top:2%;"> | ||
<div class="text"> | <div class="text"> | ||
− | + | Our team engaged in collaborations with three other iGEM Teams: the BostonU Wetlab Team, the Harvard iGEM Team and the Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) Team. Please refer to our Collaboration wiki page for a full write up on each of these collaborations: | |
− | + | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:BostonU_HW/Collaborations"> | |
− | + | <button class="btn btn-round btn-danger">Collaborations</button> | |
− | + | </a> | |
− | + | ||
− | < | + | |
− | + | ||
− | </ | + | |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 17:13, 29 October 2017
Silver Medal Requirements
Validated Part / Validated Contribution
Convince the judges that something you created (art and design, hardware, software, etc.) performs its intended function. Provide thorough documentation of this validation on your team wiki.
Collaboration
Convince the judges you have significantly worked with any other registered iGEM team in a meaningful way. For example, mentor a team, characterize a part, troubleshoot a project, model/simulate a system or validate a software/hardware solution to a synbio problem, or be the recipient of any of these activities.
You should convince the judges that the nature of your interaction is bi-directional; they may look at the other team's wiki to see what they say about your interaction. Simply filling out a survey for a team is not enough to demonstrate a significant interaction)
Attribution
Create a page on your team wiki with clear attribution of each aspect of your project. This page must clearly designate work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services.Judges often wonder what a team has accomplished themselves. This page is your opportunity to explain what parts of your project you did and what was done by technicians, advisers, etc. This requirement is not about literature references - these can and should be displayed throughout your wiki! Please also see the Purdue Online Writing Lab for more information on how to avoid accidental plagiarism.)
Characterization / Contribution
Document at least one new substantial contribution to the iGEM community that showcases a project related to BioBricks. This contribution should be central to your project and equivalent in difficulty to making and submitting a BioBrick part.