Difference between revisions of "Team:Stuttgart/Rose and Limonene Fragrance"

Line 69: Line 69:
 
     <h8>Figure 9: Sucessful transformation of assembled rose plasmid in DH5alpha <i>E.coli</i> cells. </h8>
 
     <h8>Figure 9: Sucessful transformation of assembled rose plasmid in DH5alpha <i>E.coli</i> cells. </h8>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
     <div class="col-xs-2 col-sm-2 col-md-2">
+
     <div class="col-xs-3 col-sm-3 col-md-3">
 
     <!--<https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d7/Rosescent.png">-->
 
     <!--<https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d7/Rosescent.png">-->
 
     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/4e/EcoriROSE1.png" class="img-responsive"/>
 
     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/4e/EcoriROSE1.png" class="img-responsive"/>

Revision as of 22:19, 30 October 2017

Results

Rose and Limonene Fragrance

Rose Fragrance

The plasmids from Guo et al. pET28a-KDC-YjgB-ARO8 and pET28a-ATF1, used in this study, were sucessfully confirmed by sequencing the plasmids at GATC (Figure 9 and 10). The rose genes KDC-YjgB-ARO8 and ATF1 were sucessfully amplified by PCR. The agarosegel analysis (Fig.11) showed expected ties in the range between 4000-5000 kDa for KDC-YjgB-ARO8 and another tie at 1600 kDa for ATF1. The arabiniose-inducable promotor pBAD (BBa_K206000 from the iGEM kit plate) could also be amplified by PCR. The purified PCR product showed a discrete tie at 130 kDa. Additionally another PCR was perfomed, to couple the pBAD promotor to the gene complex with KDC-YjgB-ARO8. The Verification by agarosegel electrophoresis showed that the coupling wasn't sucessfull.


Figure 9: Sequenced rose plasmid (pET28a-ATF1, 7601 bp) from Guo et al.
Figure 10: Sequenced rose plasmid (pET28a-KDC-YjgB-ARO8, 11.106 bp) from Guo et al.
Figure 11: Agaraose-gel electrophoresis of purified rose-PCR products

The overlap PCR products were assembled by Gibson Assembly (see protocols) in a pSB1K3 backbone. The assembled rose plasmids were sucessfully transformed into DH5alpha E.coli cells. Unfortunately, despite sucessfull transformation, the rose plasmid genes couldn't be confirmed by colony PCR (Figure 12). Subsequent studied also showed no success. To confirm the rose plasmid restriction digests were performed. Therefor the assembled rose plasmids were cut with EcoRI and SpeI (Figure 13). The restriction digest failed both times. Sequencing analysis of the assembled rose plasmid by GATC showed that only a part of ATF1 and kanamycin resistence was inserted in E.coli. Despite further investigations and efforts it wasn't possible to assemble all four rose genes with a pBAD promotor and transform them into E.coli, like described by Guo et al.

Figure 9: Sucessful transformation of assembled rose plasmid in DH5alpha E.coli cells.
Figure 9: Sucessful transformation of assembled rose plasmid in DH5alpha E.coli cells.
Figure 12: Purified rose plasmids from different transformations and colonys (1-5. Cut with EcoRI. E.coli cells.
Figure 12: Purified rose plasmids from different transformations and colonys (1-5. Cut with EcoRI. E.coli cells.