Hakimbazol (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
<h1 class="ITB_h1" style="padding-bottom: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; border-bottom: 2px solid #1c2922 !important; padding-left: 30px; font-size: 30px; text-align: justify; color: #1c2922" id="petrans">PETase Transcription</h1> | <h1 class="ITB_h1" style="padding-bottom: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; border-bottom: 2px solid #1c2922 !important; padding-left: 30px; font-size: 30px; text-align: justify; color: #1c2922" id="petrans">PETase Transcription</h1> | ||
− | <p><justify>After we have inoculated bacteria until biofilm was formed, | + | <p><justify>After we have inoculated bacteria until biofilm was formed, we will focus to the PETase production process in bacterium body, or usually called transcription.</justify> |
The illustration of transcription of PETase is given below. | The illustration of transcription of PETase is given below. | ||
Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
<h1 class="ITB_h1" style="padding-bottom: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; border-bottom: 2px solid #1c2922 !important; padding-left: 30px; font-size: 30px; text-align: justify; color: #1c2922" id="ratePET">Rate of PET Degradation with Biofilm</h1> | <h1 class="ITB_h1" style="padding-bottom: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; border-bottom: 2px solid #1c2922 !important; padding-left: 30px; font-size: 30px; text-align: justify; color: #1c2922" id="ratePET">Rate of PET Degradation with Biofilm</h1> | ||
− | <p><justify>Based on PETase production model, we use value of PETase production | + | <p><justify>Based on PETase production model, we use value of PETase production as the initial value of PETase during PET degradation, based on the system we have <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ITB_Indonesia/Design">designed.</a> |
<p>Based on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ITB_Indonesia/Design">design</a>, assumptions that we used are :</p> | <p>Based on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ITB_Indonesia/Design">design</a>, assumptions that we used are :</p> | ||
− | <p>1. Biofilm covered <i>E. coli</i> from the effect of nutrient solution, however, the bottom section of E. coli is | + | <p>1. Biofilm covered <i>E. coli</i> from the effect of nutrient solution, however, the bottom section of E. coli is in contact with PET.</p> |
<p>2. </p> | <p>2. </p> | ||
− | <p><justify>Enzymatic reaction of PETase is assumed to obey two mechanisms reaction, i.e. Langmuir adsorption isotherm that applied in hydrolysis reaction that using Michaelis-Menten kinetics. One of the main reason for not applying all of mechanism Michaelis Menten kinetics in PET degradation mechanism was | + | <p><justify>Enzymatic reaction of PETase is assumed to obey two mechanisms reaction, i.e. Langmuir adsorption isotherm that applied in hydrolysis reaction that using Michaelis-Menten kinetics. One of the main reason for not applying all of mechanism Michaelis Menten kinetics in PET degradation mechanism was the involvement of heterogeneous reaction during hydrolysis []. Based on Langmuir adsorption isotherm, we can derive mathematical expression that implemented to Michaelis Menten kinetics. </justify> |
Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation is :</p> | Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation is :</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><center><img src="https://2017.igem.org/File:T-ITB_Indonesia--ODE1re.gif" style="width: auto; height: auto;" align="middle"/></center></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><center><img src="https://2017.igem.org/File:T-ITB_Indonesia--ODE2re.gif" style="width: auto; height: auto;" align="middle"/></center></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><center><img src="https://2017.igem.org/File:T-ITB_Indonesia--ODE3re.gif" style="width: auto; height: auto;" align="middle"/></center></p> | ||
<p><justify>Whereas q is quality of PET enzyme adsorption by unit quality PET, g; qm is the maximum adsorption of PET enzyme by unit quality PET, g; Ka is the adsorption dissociation constant, mL/g; Ef is the concentration of free PET enzyme in the solution, g/mL.</justify></p> | <p><justify>Whereas q is quality of PET enzyme adsorption by unit quality PET, g; qm is the maximum adsorption of PET enzyme by unit quality PET, g; Ka is the adsorption dissociation constant, mL/g; Ef is the concentration of free PET enzyme in the solution, g/mL.</justify></p> |
Revision as of 15:49, 31 October 2017
Modelling
Quorum Sensing / PETase Transcription / Rate of PET Degradation with Biofilm / Rate of PET Degradation without Biofilm
Modelling Towards Precise Prediction
1) quorum sensing time to predict when biofilm formed 2) the rate of PETase production 3) PET hydrolysis by PETase with and without biofilm.
Quorum Sensing
Assumption that we used in quorum sensing module is AI-2 production constant equals to AI-2 signaling constant.
Here ODEs that we used :
Growth curve :
AI-2 Production :
Biofilm Formation :
Parameter | Definition | Value | Dimension | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
μ | Specific growth rate | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
Xmax | Maximum carrying capacity | 0.76 | OD600 | This study |
cA | Signaling constant | 2.5 x 10-3 | h-1 | This study |
μ | Specific growth rate | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
kQ | Monod constant | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
AI2max | Specific growth rate | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
cS | Specific growth rate | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
kB | Biofilm growth constant | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
Bmax | Biofilm carrying capacity | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
PETase Transcription
1. No inclusion body is produced during the transcription. Consecutively, there’s also no TetR produced during the transcription.
2. Initally, there are 0.05 μM of mRNA and zero amount of PETase.
There, the differential equations of each parameter obtained through the analysis of mass balance are :Rate of PET Degradation with Biofilm
Based on the design, assumptions that we used are : 1. Biofilm covered E. coli from the effect of nutrient solution, however, the bottom section of E. coli is in contact with PET. 2.
Corellation of q and qm,
So equation 1 can be rewritten as :
Based on assumptions that used in [], we get :
Reaction mechanisms of PET degradation are stated below.
We can derive differential equations that we need from reaction mechanisms. Here is coupled ODEs that we used to determine rate of PETase formation and degradation of PET with biofilm forming based on assumptions that stated above.
Whereas PET defined as PET, E as PETase, and P is ethylene terephtalate, the product from PET degradation by PETase.
Parameter | Definition | Value | Dimension | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
μ | Specific growth rate | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
Xmax | Maximum carrying capacity | 0.76 | OD600 | This study |
cA | Signaling constant | 2.5 x 10-3 | h-1 | This study |
μ | Specific growth rate | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
kQ | Monod constant | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
AI2max | Specific growth rate | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
cS | Specific growth rate | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
kB | Biofilm growth constant | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
Bmax | Biofilm carrying capacity | 0.42 | h-1 | This study |
Rate of PET Degradation without Biofilm
Comparing to degradation rate of PET with biofilm, PETase that can break down PET must be diffused into nutrient broth so surface contacting is occured, based on our design. So our hypothesis is degradation of PET without biofilm slower than with biofilm.