Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
<div class="container-fluid"> | <div class="container-fluid"> | ||
− | <div class = "row" style ="background-color:#e2e2e2;margin-top: | + | <div class = "row" style ="background-color:#e2e2e2;margin-top:60px;" align="center"> |
− | <img class=" | + | <img class="img-responsive" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/04/Resultsbanner-01.png" width="90%"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
<div class = "divider5"></div><br> | <div class = "divider5"></div><br> | ||
<center><img class = "img-responsive" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/ff/T--Sydney_Australia--Results5.png" width= "100%"></center> | <center><img class = "img-responsive" src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/ff/T--Sydney_Australia--Results5.png" width= "100%"></center> | ||
− | <h4>Figure | + | <h4>Figure 5: Expressed recombinant insulins stimulate glycogen synthesis. 4A and 4B: Comparison of mean glycogen synthesis rate in a glucose uptake assay using human HepG2 (4A) and murine AML12 cell lines (4B). 4C: Comparison of mean rate of glucose oxidation in HepG2 cell culture from glucose uptake assay. Conditions indicated on the graphs are: Basal (no insulin added); Ecotin Proinsulin (from whole cell lysate with trypsin treatment); Cytoplasmic Proinsulin (from whole cell lysate with trypsin treatment); YncM Winsulin (cell culture media only). Refer to protocols page for experimental details. Error bars represent SEM, horizontal bars indicate statistical significance (* = p<0.05, ** = p<0.0001) calculated with GraphPad Prism using unpaired 1-tailed T-test, n=3. |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 213: | Line 213: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <div class = "row"> | + | <div class = "row" align ="center"> |
<div class = "content" id="please"> | <div class = "content" id="please"> | ||
<center><h1>Future Directions</h1> | <center><h1>Future Directions</h1> | ||
<div class = "divider1"></div></center> | <div class = "divider1"></div></center> | ||
− | < | + | <h2>Improve reliability of preliminary data</h2> |
− | + | <h4>We were limited in time and supplies to test all of our constructs rigorously and although we have good preliminary data, it would be insufficient to justify Winsulin for clinical trials at this point. Re-doing the expression process and assays with more samples would gather the data necessary to put it in the pipeline for large scale experimentation and eventually clinical trials.</h4> | |
− | + | ||
− | < | + | |
− | + | ||
− | </ | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | <h2>Optimise recombinant Insulin/Winsulin Yield</h2> | |
− | < | + | <h4>Increasing yield would be the most important aspect of improving our product to make large scale production viable and ultimately reduce the cost per dose. Here we have outlined a few ways in which we believe are realistic methods to approach this: <br> |
− | < | + | Part of increasing yield would be to increase the amount of protein moved out of the cell in our Bacillus secretion method and into the periplasm for E. coli expression. This could potentially be achieved by increasing the efficiency of the respective targeting tags, YncM and Ecotin using random or targeted mutagenesis.<br> |
− | < | + | <br>While pET15-b and pUS258 are designed for high expression of recombinant protein, it may be the case that other vector/expression systems are better suited to expressing our particular constructs, and it would be naive to proceed to large scale production without trialling other options. <br> |
− | < | + | Another option that some of the other big insulin producers have adopted is to modify their cell lines. While we already took the first steps towards this by using the existing protease knockout strain WB800, further optimisations could be made using CRISPR gene editing. We could experimentally target a number of genes including folding chaperones and proteins related to the secretory pathway. Another viable method would be to use whole genome CRISPR screening as a more random method of identifying knockouts that may enhance expression where we wouldn’t think of targeting.<br> |
− | </ | + | |
− | < | + | <br><h2>Characterise Winsulin</h2> |
− | </ | + | <h4>Because the Winsulin analogue is completely novel, it will need in depth characterisation, particularly if it continues to show functional capacity. Proteomic analysis to provide information about structure, charge, binding mechanism and stability are just some of the properties that are essential if it was to be considered as a therapeutic. </h4> |
− | </h4> | + | <br> |
+ | <h2>Additional functional analysis</h2> | ||
+ | <h4>While the glucose uptake assay using human hepatocytes is an excellent in vitro experiment to determine functionality of our recombinant protein, it simply won’t be sufficient evidence to prove that complies with the overall physiology of humans. We will need to perform a number of in vivo experiments using a diabetic mouse model to show that it can be viable as a hormone replacement therapy that won’t elicit an immune response.</h4><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>Scale-up Production</h2> | ||
+ | <h4>Once the expression efficiency has been optimised and the recombinant proteins have been well characterised, we will need to consider methods to scale up production to produce enough insulin to compete in the market. Our vision involves the use of large vats with bacteria secreting our insulin into the media, and figuring out a way to efficiently separate the protein directly giving a somewhat continuous production, rather than emptying the vats and starting from scratch.</h4> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 11:49, 1 November 2017