Difference between revisions of "Team:REC-CHENNAI/HP/Gold Integrated"

 
Line 32: Line 32:
 
discussions, we concluded that the working with the mutated peptide would be more appropriate.<p>
 
discussions, we concluded that the working with the mutated peptide would be more appropriate.<p>
 
 
−
<p>Dr.Ng.Iboyaima Singh felt that our delivery mechanism wasn't feasible. Initially, we planned on
+
<p>Dr.Ng.Iboyaima Singh felt that our delivery mechanism might not turn out to be cost effective while scaling up. He suggested that we look into active antimicrobial packaging as a viable alternative. However due to time constraints, we were unable to design and bring to life a suitable matrix system for immobilizing our peptide based on this idea. In the future, we plan to work on bringing to life an active packaging system using our peptide. </p>
−
enclosing our peptide within two semi permeable membranes. Dr.Singh pointed out that this idea
+
−
would not be cost effective while scaling up. He suggested that we look into active antimicrobial
+
−
packaging as a viable alternative. We took up his suggestion and tried to best fit to our project.</p>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 17:04, 1 November 2017