Team:UiOslo Norway/Discussion
Discussion
Sadly we was not able to prove the concept of a biolaser with our gain medium. We tried to use pure sfGFP in a sample as it had a more concentrated solvent of sfGFP to prove lasing, but was not successful. As well we did not get an result for the yeast cells.
We did see some light being emitted with the corresponding wavelength for sfGFP, with the sfGFP solvent, but it was not strong enough for us to see if it was lasing within the gain medium (wrong words?).
XX ref to single cell article that manage to have lasing within a pure solvent of GFP? XX
When trying to figure out what went wrong, we quickly looked at our mirrors. Due to lacking of equipment with the correct specs at UiO, we joyfully got some mirrors sponsored by Thorlabs. Due to the fast approaching deadline we had to improvise by using filters and concave mirrors to get the “Shortpass Dichroic Mirrors”-effect. This made us change our initial plan for the set up, and we knew it would be hard to get the mirrors aligned correctly. As we also did not have a optical bench we made due with what we had, but in the end it proved not successful.
Another reason might be that we did not manage to get high enough intensity from the LED. Still by trying to concentrate (and saving) the light, and by adding another LED, we did not see any trace of lasing with the CCD camera. We did see some light in our spectrometer, but we did not manage to catch the light from the CCD camera and therefore it’s difficult to say what kind of properties the light had.
Lastly, when we finally felt confident in our set up, the sfGFP was getting old and it actually emitted some red light it not did before. At this point we tried once more with the yeast but was still not able to catch anything with our CCD camera and there was no time making any new sfGFP.
other notes: why red light, why not able to measure the light when we could see it with our eyes?
