Difference between revisions of "Team:Manchester/Demonstrate"

 
(40 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{:Team:Manchester/Templates/NavBar}}
 
{{:Team:Manchester/Templates/NavBar}}
 +
{{ManchesterMobile}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
 +
<head>
  
 +
<style>
  
 +
body {
 +
    background-color:;
 +
    overflow-x: hidden
 +
}
  
<div class="column full_size judges-will-not-evaluate">
+
.sectionfirst {
<h3>★  ALERT! </h3>
+
  margin-top: 20px!important;
<p>This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Judging/Medals">medal criterion</a> or <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Judging/Awards"> award listed above</a>. </p>
+
  padding-top: 10vh;
<p> Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Judging/Pages_for_Awards"> Instructions for Pages for awards</a>.</p>
+
  height: 30vh;
</div>
+
  background: transparent;
<div class="clear"></div>
+
  background-size: cover
 +
}
  
 +
.border {
 +
  background-color: #c4c4c4;
 +
  color: #fff;
 +
  padding: 18px;
 +
  letter-spacing: 10px;
 +
  opacity: 1
 +
}
  
<div class="column full_size">
+
.col-md-4 img {
<h1>Demonstrate</h1>
+
  width: 20vw;
<h3>Gold Medal Criterion #4</h3>
+
  display: block;
 +
  margin-left: auto;
 +
  margin-right: auto
 +
}
  
<p>
+
.displaybox {
Teams that can show their system working under real world conditions are usually good at impressing the judges in iGEM. To achieve gold medal criterion #4, convince the judges that your project works. There are many ways in which your project working could be demonstrated, so there is more than one way to meet this requirement. This gold medal criterion was introduced in 2016, so check our what 2016 teams did to achieve a their gold medals!
+
    padding-top: 10px;
</p>
+
    display: block;
 +
    min-height: 40vh;
 +
    border: 3px solid transparent;
 +
    border-radius:;
 +
    width: 100vw!important;
 +
    overflow-x: hidden;
 +
    opacity: 1.0;
 +
    -webkit-transition: 0.3s ease-in-out;
 +
    -moz-transition: 0.3s ease-in-out;
 +
    -ms-transition: 0.3s ease-in-out;
 +
    -o-transition: 0.3s ease-in-out;
 +
    transition: 0.3s ease-in-out
 +
}
  
<p>
+
h4 {
Please see the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Judging/Medals">2017 Medals Page</a> for more information.
+
  font-size: 35px!important;
</p>
+
  font-weight: 400;
 +
  font-family: 'Calibri'!important;
 +
  padding: 2%!important;
 +
  text-align: center;
 +
}
  
 +
h2 {
 +
  font-size: 40px!important;
 +
  font-weight: 400;
 +
  font-family: 'Calibri'!important;
 +
  padding: 2%!important;
 +
  text-align: center;
 +
}
  
</div>
+
h3 {
 +
  font-size: 25px!important;
 +
  font-family: 'Calibri'!important;
 +
  color: #111;
 +
  text-align: justify;
 +
  text-justify: inter-word;
 +
  margin: 0em
 +
}
  
 +
p {
 +
  text-align: justify;
 +
  text-justify: inter-word;
 +
  font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif;
 +
}
  
<div class="column half_size">
+
</style>
  
<h4> What should we do for our demonstration?</h4>
+
</head>
  
<h5> Standard teams </h5>
+
<body>
  
<p>  
+
<div class="clear"></div>
If you have built a proof of concept system, you can demonstrate it working under real world conditions. If you have built a biological device that is intended to be a sensor, can you show it detecting whatever it is intended to sense. If it is intended to work in the field, you can show how this might work using a simulated version in the lab, or a simulation of your device in the field.<strong> Please note biological materials must not be taken out of the lab</strong>.
+
 
</p>
+
<div class="col-md-12 sectionfirst" style="background-color: #fbf9f8!important">
 +
<h2 class="border" style="margin-top: 5vh; text-align: center">Proof of Concept</h2>
 +
<br/>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div class="column half_size">
+
<div class="clear" style="padding: 0px 12vw; border: 3px solid transparent; background-color: #fbf9f8!important">
 +
  <center>
 +
    <h4><font color="#111">Microscopy</font></h4>
 +
    <hr class="dark">
 +
  </center>
  
 +
<p><font color="#111">We aimed to demonstrate the functionality of our Eut-PPK-tag system by visual means. By using a DAPI stain, mCherry and fluorescence microscopy, we could distinguish tag expression, tag localisation within the Eut microcompartment and polyphosphate production all from the same microscope slides.<br>
 +
<br>
 +
We learned that polyphosphate chains can be stained using DAPI from <a href=" https://www.nature.com/protocolexchange/protocols/4075#/main " target="_blank"><b>this journal article</b></a> in Nature, which can then be visualised by setting the excitation filter at 370nm and emission filter at 526nm. This meant that using two different filters would allow both the DAPI signal and the mCherry signal from cells to be pictured.<br>
 +
<br>
 +
In theory these two signals would overlap as the mCherry tagged PPK would produce a polyphosphate chain, which would be stained with DAPI, both of which would be found localised within the Eut microcompartment.</p><br>
 +
<br>
 +
<h3><b>Control experiment with no expression of Eut Microcompartment</b></h3><br>
 +
<p><font color="#111">To test DAPI’s spatial distribution within cells after staining, we performed a control stain in E. coli which only express the medium promoter tag <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2213007"target="_blank"><b>(BBa_K2213007)</b></a> with no expression of any Eut microcompartment subunits or PPK. Our choice of control cells also allowed us to confirm that we could visualise both signals from the same cells.</p><br>
 +
<br>
 +
<center>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a9/MidDAPIcontrol.png" width="800" height="317">
 +
</center>
 +
<p><font color="#111"><center></h3><b>Figure 1.</b> Visible light, mCherry and DAPI signals from DAPI stained E. coli expressing Medium strength Anderson promoter-PduD construct.</center></p>
 
<br>
 
<br>
<h5> Special track teams </h5>
 
 
<p>
 
Special track teams can achieve this medal criterion by bringing their work to the Jamboree and showcasing it in the track event. Art & Design, Measurement, Hardware and Software tracks will all have showcase events at the Giant Jamboree.<strong> Please note biological materials must not be taken out of the lab</strong>.
 
</p>
 
  
 +
<p><font color="#111">As shown, the distribution of DAPI in the absence of polyphosphate was roughly homogeneous with no obvious clumping or accumulation. The same homogeneous distribution of mCherry was also observed, demonstrating that the DAPI stain does not interfere with the distribution of the tag. This suggested that, if working properly, images of our construct would display clear accumulation of both mCherry and DAPI signals in the same location within the cell.</p><br>
 +
<br>
 +
<h3><b>DAPI-stained polyphosphate localises around mCherry tagged PPK targeted to BMC</b></h3><br>
 +
<p>So in line with this, we DAPI stained a 24h induction of EutLK-Low-PduD-mCherry-PPK <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2213013"target="_blank"><b>(BBa_K2213013)</b></a> with EutSMN <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2213012"target="_blank"><b>(BBa_K2213012)</b></a>:</p><br>
 +
<br>
 +
<center>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d0/SMNLKDAPI1.png" width="300" height="300">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b5/SMNLKDAPI2.png" width="300" height="300">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f6/SMNLKDAPI4.png" width="300" height="300">
 +
</center>
 +
<p><font color="#111"><center></h3><b>Figure 2.</b> Fluorescence microscopy images of promoter-PduD associated mCherry and DAPI stained polyphosphate.</center></p>
 +
<br>
  
 +
<p><font color="#111">This heterogeneous distribution of DAPI indicates successful dying of polyphosphate and confirms the activity of our PPK along with its successful localisation into our bacterial microcompartment. These findings help establish a proof-of-concept functionality of our Phosphostore system and demonstrate successful Eut subunit expression, successful tag localisation and successful PPK activity.</p><br>
 +
<br>
 +
</font></p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 +
<div class="plan" style="padding: 0px 8vw; background-color: #fbf9f8!important">
 +
 +
<a class="floatleft1 project projectlink" href= " https://2017.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Medals " ><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/7c/T--Manchester--Next_Arrow17.jpg"></a>
 +
 +
<a class="floatright1 project projectlink" href= " https://2017.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Results5 " ><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0a/T--Manchester--BACKARROW17MAN.jpg"></a>
 +
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
</div>
  
  
 +
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 +
{{:Team:Manchester/Templates/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 02:26, 2 November 2017

Proof of Concept


Microscopy


We aimed to demonstrate the functionality of our Eut-PPK-tag system by visual means. By using a DAPI stain, mCherry and fluorescence microscopy, we could distinguish tag expression, tag localisation within the Eut microcompartment and polyphosphate production all from the same microscope slides.

We learned that polyphosphate chains can be stained using DAPI from this journal article in Nature, which can then be visualised by setting the excitation filter at 370nm and emission filter at 526nm. This meant that using two different filters would allow both the DAPI signal and the mCherry signal from cells to be pictured.

In theory these two signals would overlap as the mCherry tagged PPK would produce a polyphosphate chain, which would be stained with DAPI, both of which would be found localised within the Eut microcompartment.



Control experiment with no expression of Eut Microcompartment


To test DAPI’s spatial distribution within cells after staining, we performed a control stain in E. coli which only express the medium promoter tag (BBa_K2213007) with no expression of any Eut microcompartment subunits or PPK. Our choice of control cells also allowed us to confirm that we could visualise both signals from the same cells.



Figure 1. Visible light, mCherry and DAPI signals from DAPI stained E. coli expressing Medium strength Anderson promoter-PduD construct.


As shown, the distribution of DAPI in the absence of polyphosphate was roughly homogeneous with no obvious clumping or accumulation. The same homogeneous distribution of mCherry was also observed, demonstrating that the DAPI stain does not interfere with the distribution of the tag. This suggested that, if working properly, images of our construct would display clear accumulation of both mCherry and DAPI signals in the same location within the cell.



DAPI-stained polyphosphate localises around mCherry tagged PPK targeted to BMC


So in line with this, we DAPI stained a 24h induction of EutLK-Low-PduD-mCherry-PPK (BBa_K2213013) with EutSMN (BBa_K2213012):



Figure 2. Fluorescence microscopy images of promoter-PduD associated mCherry and DAPI stained polyphosphate.


This heterogeneous distribution of DAPI indicates successful dying of polyphosphate and confirms the activity of our PPK along with its successful localisation into our bacterial microcompartment. These findings help establish a proof-of-concept functionality of our Phosphostore system and demonstrate successful Eut subunit expression, successful tag localisation and successful PPK activity.