Difference between revisions of "Team:Manchester/Demonstrate"

 
(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 86: Line 86:
  
 
<body>
 
<body>
 +
 +
<div class="clear"></div>
  
 
<div class="col-md-12 sectionfirst" style="background-color: #fbf9f8!important">
 
<div class="col-md-12 sectionfirst" style="background-color: #fbf9f8!important">
Line 100: Line 102:
 
<p><font color="#111">We aimed to demonstrate the functionality of our Eut-PPK-tag system by visual means. By using a DAPI stain, mCherry and fluorescence microscopy, we could distinguish tag expression, tag localisation within the Eut microcompartment and polyphosphate production all from the same microscope slides.<br>
 
<p><font color="#111">We aimed to demonstrate the functionality of our Eut-PPK-tag system by visual means. By using a DAPI stain, mCherry and fluorescence microscopy, we could distinguish tag expression, tag localisation within the Eut microcompartment and polyphosphate production all from the same microscope slides.<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
From literature we learned that polyphosphate chains can be stained using DAPI, which can then be visualised using a separate excitation wavelength from mCherry. This meant that using two different filters would allow both the DAPI signal and the mCherry signal from cells to be pictured.<br>
+
We learned that polyphosphate chains can be stained using DAPI from <a href=" https://www.nature.com/protocolexchange/protocols/4075#/main " target="_blank"><b>this journal article</b></a> in Nature, which can then be visualised by setting the excitation filter at 370nm and emission filter at 526nm. This meant that using two different filters would allow both the DAPI signal and the mCherry signal from cells to be pictured.<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
In theory these two signals would overlap as the mCherry tagged PPK would produce a polyphosphate chain, which would be stained with DAPI, both of which would be found localised within the Eut microcompartment.</p><br>
 
In theory these two signals would overlap as the mCherry tagged PPK would produce a polyphosphate chain, which would be stained with DAPI, both of which would be found localised within the Eut microcompartment.</p><br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
<h3><b>Control experiment with no PPK</b></h3><br>
+
<h3><b>Control experiment with no expression of Eut Microcompartment</b></h3><br>
<p><font color="#111">To test DAPI’s spatial distribution within cells after staining, we performed a control stain in E. coli which only express the medium promoter tag and no expression of Eut microcompartments. Our choice of control cells also allowed us to confirm that we could visualise both signals from the same cells.</p><br>
+
<p><font color="#111">To test DAPI’s spatial distribution within cells after staining, we performed a control stain in E. coli which only express the medium promoter tag <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2213007"target="_blank"><b>(BBa_K2213007)</b></a> with no expression of any Eut microcompartment subunits or PPK. Our choice of control cells also allowed us to confirm that we could visualise both signals from the same cells.</p><br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<center>
 
<center>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a9/MidDAPIcontrol.png" width="800" height="317">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a9/MidDAPIcontrol.png" width="800" height="317">
 
</center>
 
</center>
 +
<p><font color="#111"><center></h3><b>Figure 1.</b> Visible light, mCherry and DAPI signals from DAPI stained E. coli expressing Medium strength Anderson promoter-PduD construct.</center></p>
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
<p><font color="#111">As shown, the distribution of DAPI in the absence of polyphosphate was roughly homogeneous with no obvious clumping or accumulation. The same homogeneous distribution of mCherry was also observed, demonstrating that the DAPI stain does not interfere with the distribution of the tag. This suggested that, if working properly, images of our construct would display clear accumulation of both mCherry and DAPI signals in the same location within the cell.<br>
+
<p><font color="#111">As shown, the distribution of DAPI in the absence of polyphosphate was roughly homogeneous with no obvious clumping or accumulation. The same homogeneous distribution of mCherry was also observed, demonstrating that the DAPI stain does not interfere with the distribution of the tag. This suggested that, if working properly, images of our construct would display clear accumulation of both mCherry and DAPI signals in the same location within the cell.</p><br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<h3><b>DAPI-stained polyphosphate localises around mCherry tagged PPK targeted to BMC</b></h3><br>
 
<h3><b>DAPI-stained polyphosphate localises around mCherry tagged PPK targeted to BMC</b></h3><br>
So in line with this, we DAPI stained a 24h induction of EutLK-Low-PduD-mCherry-PPK with EutSMN:<br>
+
<p>So in line with this, we DAPI stained a 24h induction of EutLK-Low-PduD-mCherry-PPK <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2213013"target="_blank"><b>(BBa_K2213013)</b></a> with EutSMN <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2213012"target="_blank"><b>(BBa_K2213012)</b></a>:</p><br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<center>
 
<center>
Line 122: Line 125:
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f6/SMNLKDAPI4.png" width="300" height="300">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f6/SMNLKDAPI4.png" width="300" height="300">
 
</center>
 
</center>
 +
<p><font color="#111"><center></h3><b>Figure 2.</b> Fluorescence microscopy images of promoter-PduD associated mCherry and DAPI stained polyphosphate.</center></p>
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
<p><font color="#111">As shown, there is a heterogeneous distribution of fluorescence within the cells for both signals and they are approximately in the same areas. This heterogeneous distribution of DAPI indicates the presence of polyphosphate and proves the activity of our PPK along with its successful localization into our bacterial microcompartment. The localisation can be determined using the physical location of both fluorescence signals within the cell.<br>
+
<p><font color="#111">This heterogeneous distribution of DAPI indicates successful dying of polyphosphate and confirms the activity of our PPK along with its successful localisation into our bacterial microcompartment. These findings help establish a proof-of-concept functionality of our Phosphostore system and demonstrate successful Eut subunit expression, successful tag localisation and successful PPK activity.</p><br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
</font></p>
 
</font></p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 +
<div class="plan" style="padding: 0px 8vw; background-color: #fbf9f8!important">
 +
 +
<a class="floatleft1 project projectlink" href= " https://2017.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Medals " ><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/7c/T--Manchester--Next_Arrow17.jpg"></a>
 +
 +
<a class="floatright1 project projectlink" href= " https://2017.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Results5 " ><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0a/T--Manchester--BACKARROW17MAN.jpg"></a>
 +
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
</div>
  
  

Latest revision as of 02:26, 2 November 2017

Proof of Concept


Microscopy


We aimed to demonstrate the functionality of our Eut-PPK-tag system by visual means. By using a DAPI stain, mCherry and fluorescence microscopy, we could distinguish tag expression, tag localisation within the Eut microcompartment and polyphosphate production all from the same microscope slides.

We learned that polyphosphate chains can be stained using DAPI from this journal article in Nature, which can then be visualised by setting the excitation filter at 370nm and emission filter at 526nm. This meant that using two different filters would allow both the DAPI signal and the mCherry signal from cells to be pictured.

In theory these two signals would overlap as the mCherry tagged PPK would produce a polyphosphate chain, which would be stained with DAPI, both of which would be found localised within the Eut microcompartment.



Control experiment with no expression of Eut Microcompartment


To test DAPI’s spatial distribution within cells after staining, we performed a control stain in E. coli which only express the medium promoter tag (BBa_K2213007) with no expression of any Eut microcompartment subunits or PPK. Our choice of control cells also allowed us to confirm that we could visualise both signals from the same cells.



Figure 1. Visible light, mCherry and DAPI signals from DAPI stained E. coli expressing Medium strength Anderson promoter-PduD construct.


As shown, the distribution of DAPI in the absence of polyphosphate was roughly homogeneous with no obvious clumping or accumulation. The same homogeneous distribution of mCherry was also observed, demonstrating that the DAPI stain does not interfere with the distribution of the tag. This suggested that, if working properly, images of our construct would display clear accumulation of both mCherry and DAPI signals in the same location within the cell.



DAPI-stained polyphosphate localises around mCherry tagged PPK targeted to BMC


So in line with this, we DAPI stained a 24h induction of EutLK-Low-PduD-mCherry-PPK (BBa_K2213013) with EutSMN (BBa_K2213012):



Figure 2. Fluorescence microscopy images of promoter-PduD associated mCherry and DAPI stained polyphosphate.


This heterogeneous distribution of DAPI indicates successful dying of polyphosphate and confirms the activity of our PPK along with its successful localisation into our bacterial microcompartment. These findings help establish a proof-of-concept functionality of our Phosphostore system and demonstrate successful Eut subunit expression, successful tag localisation and successful PPK activity.