Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong HKU/HP/Gold Integrated"
(Prototype team page) |
Yashshukla (Talk | contribs) m (Add nav bar removed judge box) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{Hong_Kong_HKU}} | + | {{:Team:Hong_Kong_HKU/Templates/NavBar}} |
<html> | <html> | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
<div class="clear"></div> | <div class="clear"></div> | ||
Revision as of 13:02, 9 October 2017
Gold Medal and Integrated Human Practices
This page will contain information for your Gold medal Human Practices work, which you can also use to nominate your team for the Best Integrated Human Practices page. To make things easier, we have combined the Gold medal page with the Best Integrated Human Practices page since we expect the work to overlap considerably.
iGEM teams are unique and leading the field because they "go beyond the lab" to imagine their projects in a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.
Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest.
For more information, please see the Human Practices page.
Gold Medal Criterion #1
Expand on your silver medal activity by demonstrating how you have integrated the investigated issues into the design and/or execution of your project.
Best Integrated Human Practices Special Prize
To compete for the Best Integrated Human Practices prize, please describe your work on this page and also fill out the description on the judging form.
You must also delete the message box on the top of this page to be eligible for this prize.
Inspiration
Here are a few examples of excellent Integrated Human Practices work:
