Difference between revisions of "Team:Manchester/Model"

Line 90: Line 90:
  
 
<div class="col-md-12" style="padding: 10px 2vw; background-color: #fbf9f8!important">
 
<div class="col-md-12" style="padding: 10px 2vw; background-color: #fbf9f8!important">
 +
 
<div class="col-md-4"><div class="somemargin">
 
<div class="col-md-4"><div class="somemargin">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8d/T--Manchester--DOElogo.jpg" width="100%"/>
+
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Model/DoE"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8d/T--Manchester--DOElogo.jpg" width="100%"/></a>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<p style="text-align: center" "font-size: 24px!important"><b>Design of Experiments</b></p>
 
<p style="text-align: center" "font-size: 24px!important"><b>Design of Experiments</b></p>

Revision as of 19:55, 29 October 2017

Modelling


1. Continuous culture modelling was used to predict the rate at which Phosphostore devices could be produced on different substrates. This allowed us to estimate the yearly cost of treating wastewater using phosphostore. As a result we performed a major re-design of the intended Phosphostore device, assessing the cost reduction potential of different growth conditions and experimental strategies by computational modelling

2. We used an innovative ensemble modelling approach to predict the behaviour of our recombinant phosphate starvation operon in addition to native PHO regulon as a regulatory system for controlling microcompartment synthesis. This helped us to choose the appropriate regulatory parts for our experimental design

3. We used statistical Design of Experiments (DoE) to design the most efficient experiments to determine the factors influencing the activity of our key enzyme. Two rounds of DoE enabled us to identify the optimal conditions for testing of our experimental system


Design of Experiments


Continuous Culture


Phosphate Starvation Operon